Delaware
|
| |
6770
|
| |
84-4117825
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
| |
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
| |
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
Steven D. Pidgeon
Andrew D. Ledbetter
DLA Piper LLP (US)
2525 East Camelback Road
Phoenix, Arizona 85016-4232
Telephone: (480) 606-5100
|
| |
Alexandra Plasencia
General Counsel
MSP Recovery, LLC
2701 Le Jeune Road, Floor 10
Coral Gables, Florida 33134
Telephone: (305) 614-2222
|
| |
Michael J. Aiello
Matthew Gilroy
Amanda Fenster
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
767 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10153
Telephone: (212) 310-8000
|
Large accelerated filer
|
| |
☐
|
| |
|
| |
Accelerated filer
|
| |
☐
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
| |
☒
|
| |
|
| |
Smaller reporting company
|
| |
☒
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Emerging growth company
|
| |
☒
|
(1)
|
The Business Combination Proposal—To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the
Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 11, 2021 (as it may be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time in accordance with its terms, the “MIPA”), a copy of which is attached to the accompanying proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex A, by and among the Company, Lionheart II Holdings, LLC, a newly formed wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Opco”), the MSP Purchased Companies (as defined in
the MIPA) (collectively, “MSP”), the members of MSP (the “Members”), and John H. Ruiz, in his capacity as the representative of the Members (the “Members’ Representative”), and the transactions contemplated thereby. Pursuant to the MIPA,
the Members will sell and assign all of their membership interests in MSP to Opco in exchange for non-economic voting shares of Class V common stock, par value $0.0001, of the Company (“Class V Common Stock”) and non-voting economic
Class B Units of Opco (“Class B Units,” and each pair consisting of one share of Class V Common Stock and one Class B Unit, an “Up-C Unit”) (such transaction, the “Business Combination”). Following
the closing of the Business Combination (the “Closing”), the Company will be organized in an “Up-C” structure in which all of the business of MSP and its subsidiaries will be held directly or indirectly by Opco, and the Company will own
all of the voting economic Class A Units of Opco and the Members and their designees will own all of the non-voting economic Class B Units in accordance with the terms of the first amended and restated limited liability company agreement
of Opco (the “LLC Agreement”). Each Up-C Unit may be exchanged for either, at the Company’s option, (a) cash or (b) one share of Class A common stock, par value $0.0001, of the Company (“Class A Common Stock”), subject to the provisions
set forth in the LLC Agreement. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the MIPA, the aggregate consideration to be paid to the Members (or their designees) will consist of (i) 3,250,000,000 Up-C Units and (ii) rights to receive
payments under the tax receivable agreement to be entered into at the Closing. Of the Up-C Units to be issued to certain Members at Closing, 6,000,000 (the “Escrow Units”) will be deposited into an escrow account with Continental Stock
Transfer and Trust Company to satisfy any indemnification claims that may be brought pursuant to the MIPA. Additionally, in connection with the Business Combination, the Company intends, subject to compliance with applicable law, to
declare a dividend comprising approximately 1,029,000,000 newly issued warrants, each to purchase one share of Class A Common Stock for an exercise price of $11.50 per share (the “New Warrants”), conditioned upon the consummation of any
redemptions by the holders of Class A Common Stock and the Closing, to the holders of record of the Class A Common Stock as of the close of business on the date of Closing (the “Closing Date”), after giving effect to the waiver of the
right, title and interest in, to or under, participation in any such dividend by the Members, on behalf of themselves and any of their designees. Following the Closing, the Company will have two classes of authorized common stock. The
shares of Class A Common Stock and Class V Common Stock each will be entitled to one vote per share on matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. Holders of the Class V Common Stock will not have any of the economic rights (including
rights to dividends and distributions upon liquidation) provided to holders of the Class A Common Stock. Following the Closing, assuming no additional redemptions by Public Stockholders (after giving effect to the redemption of
10,946,369 shares of Class A Common Stock in connection with the Company stockholder vote to approve the Extension Amendment (as defined below)) (the “no redemption scenario”) and excluding the impact on any outstanding warrants and New
Warrants, John H. Ruiz, the CEO and founder of MSP, and Frank C. Quesada, the CLO of MSP, will together control approximately 92.58% of the combined voting power of the capital stock of the Company (assuming no attributed ownership based
on Messrs. Ruiz and Quesada’s investment in VRM) (the “Business Combination Proposal”). Such ownership percentages will be affected by the level of redemptions by Public Stockholders and the exercise of outstanding warrants or New
Warrants. See “Summary—Ownership of the Post- Combination Company”;
|
(2)
|
The Nasdaq Proposal—To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve, for purposes of
complying with applicable listing rules of The Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”) the issuance of more than 20% of the issued and outstanding common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of the Company and voting power in connection with the
Business Combination (the “Nasdaq Proposal”);
|
(3)
|
The Charter Approval Proposal—To consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Proposed Charter”) in the form attached to the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B (the “Charter Approval Proposal”);
|
(4)
|
The Non-Binding Governance Proposals—To consider and vote upon, on a non-binding
advisory basis, the separate proposals with respect to certain governance provisions in the Proposed Charter in accordance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Non-Binding Governance Proposals”):
|
a.
|
Proposal No. 4A: Change in Authorized Shares—To (i) increase the Company’s total
number of authorized shares of capital stock from 111,000,000 shares to 8,760,000,000 shares of capital stock, (ii) increase the Company’s authorized Class A Common Stock from 100,000,000 shares to 5,500,000,000 shares of Class A Common
Stock, (iii) create the Class V Common Stock, consisting of 3,250,000,000 authorized shares of Class V Common Stock and (iv) increase the Company’s authorized shares of Preferred Stock from 1,000,000 to 10,000,000 shares of Preferred
Stock.
|
b.
|
Proposal No. 4B: Dual-Class Stock—To provide for a capital structure pursuant to
which there are two classes of common stock and in which, subject to applicable law and the rights, if any, of the holders of any outstanding series of Preferred Stock, the holders of outstanding shares of common stock of the Company will
vote together as a single class on all matters with respect to which stockholders of the Company are entitled to vote under applicable law, the Proposed Charter or the Amended and Restated Bylaws, or upon which a vote of the stockholders
generally entitled to vote is otherwise duly called for by the Company; provided, however, that except as may otherwise be required by applicable law, each holder of outstanding shares of common stock of the Company will not be entitled
to vote on any amendment to the Proposed Charter that relates solely to the terms of one or more outstanding series of Preferred Stock (including, without limitation, the powers (including voting powers), if any, preferences and relative,
participating, optional, special or other rights, if any, and the qualifications, limitations and restrictions, if any, of such series of Preferred Stock), if the holders of such affected series are entitled, either voting separately as a
single class or together as a class with the holders of any other outstanding series of Preferred Stock, to vote thereon pursuant to the Proposed Charter or the Delaware General Corporation Law. In each such vote, the holders of Class A
Common Stock and holders of Class V Common Stock will be entitled to one vote per share of Class A Common Stock or Class V Common Stock, respectively, including the election of directors and significant corporate transactions (such as a
merger or other sale of the Company or its assets).
|
c.
|
Proposal No. 4C: Removal of Directors—To provide that any director or the entire
board of directors of the Post-Combination Company (the “Board”) may be removed (i) at any time prior to the Voting Rights Threshold Date by a simple majority voting together as a single class, with or without cause, notwithstanding the
classification of the Board, and (ii) at any time from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date, solely for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 662∕3% of
the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares of the Company generally entitled to vote thereon, voting together as a single class.
|
d.
|
Proposal No. 4D: Required Stockholder Vote to Amend Certain Sections of the Proposed Charter—To
provide that, in addition to any affirmative vote required by applicable law or the Proposed Charter, from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date, the approval by affirmative vote of the holders of at least 662∕3% in voting power of the then outstanding shares of the Company generally entitled to vote is required to make any amendment to Article Seventh (Board of Directors) or Article Eighth (Written Consent
of Stockholders) of the Proposed Charter.
|
e.
|
Proposal No. 4E: Required Stockholder Vote to Amend the Amended and Restated Bylaws—To
provide that, in addition to any affirmative vote required by the Proposed Charter, any bylaw that is to be made, altered, amended or repealed by the stockholders of the Company shall receive, at any time (i) prior to the Voting Rights
Threshold Date, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority in voting power of the then outstanding shares of the Company generally entitled to vote, voting together as a single class, and (ii) from and after the Voting
Rights Threshold Date, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 662∕3% in voting power of the then outstanding shares of stock of the Company generally entitled to vote, voting
together as a single class.
|
(5)
|
The Director Election Proposal—To consider and vote upon a proposal to elect seven
directors to serve on the Board of Directors of the Post-Combination Company until the first annual meeting of stockholders following the Business Combination, in the case of Class I directors, the second annual meeting of stockholders
following the Business Combination, in the case of Class II directors, and the third annual meeting of stockholders following the Business Combination, in the case of Class III directors, and, in each case, until their respective
successors are duly elected and qualified (the “Director Election Proposal”);
|
(6)
|
The Incentive Plan Proposal—To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve and adopt
the MSP Recovery, Inc. 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) and the material terms thereunder (the “Equity Incentive Plan Proposal”). A copy of the Incentive Plan is attached to the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus as
Annex J; and
|
(7)
|
The Adjournment Proposal—To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the
adjournment of the Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, (A) to ensure that any supplement or amendment to the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus that the Board of Directors of the Company (the “LCAP Board”) has
determined in good faith is required by applicable law to be disclosed to Company stockholders and for such supplement or amendment to be promptly disseminated to Company stockholders prior to the Special Meeting, (B) if, as of the time
for which the Special Meeting is originally scheduled, there are insufficient shares of common stock represented (either in person or by proxy) to constitute a quorum necessary to conduct business at the Special Meeting or (C) to permit
further solicitation and vote of proxies if there are insufficient votes for, or otherwise in connection with, the approval of the Business Combination Proposal, the Nasdaq Proposal, the Charter Approval Proposal, the Director Election
Proposal or the Incentive Plan Proposal (the “Adjournment Proposal” and, together with the Business Combination Proposal, the Nasdaq Proposal, the Charter Approval Proposal, the Non-Binding Governance Proposals, the Director Election
Proposal and the Equity Incentive Plan Proposal, each, a “Proposal” and collectively, the “Proposals”).
|
|
| |
By Order of the Board of Directors
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Ophir Sternberg
|
|
| |
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Q:
|
WHAT IS THE BUSINESS COMBINATION?
|
A:
|
Pursuant to the MIPA, the Members will sell and assign all of their membership interests in MSP to Opco in exchange for Up-C
Units (or shares of Class A Common Stock). Following the Closing, the Company will be organized in an “Up-C” structure in which all of the business of MSP and its subsidiaries will be held directly or indirectly by Opco, and the Company
will own all of the voting economic Class A Units of Opco and the Members or their designees will own all of the non-voting economic Class B Units of Opco in accordance with the terms of the LLC Agreement. Each Up-C Unit may be exchanged
for either, at the Company’s option, (a) cash or (b) one share of Class A Common Stock, subject to the provisions set forth in the LLC Agreement. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the MIPA, the aggregate consideration to be
paid to the Members (or their designees) will consist of (i) 3,250,000,000 Up-C Units and (ii) rights to receive payments under the tax receivable agreement to be entered into at the Closing. Of the Up-C Units to be issued to certain
Members at Closing, 6,000,000 will be deposited into an escrow account with Continental Stock Transfer and Trust Company, to satisfy any indemnification claims that may be brought pursuant to the MIPA. Additionally, in connection with the
Business Combination and to provide additional consideration to holders of Class A Common Stock that do not redeem their shares of Class A Common Stock, the Company intends, subject to compliance with applicable law, to declare a dividend
comprising an aggregate of approximately 1,029,000,000 New Warrants, conditioned upon the consummation of any redemptions by the holders of Class A Common Stock and the Closing, to the holders of record of the Class A Common Stock as of
the Closing Date, after giving effect to the waiver of the right, title and interest in, to or under, participation in any such dividend by the Members, on behalf of themselves and any of their designees. Following the Closing, the
Company will have two classes of authorized common stock. The shares of Class A Common Stock and Class V Common Stock each will be entitled to one vote per share on matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. The holders of the Class V
Common Stock will not have any of the economic rights (including rights to dividends and distributions upon liquidation) provided to holders of the Class A Common Stock. Following the Closing, assuming the no redemption scenario and
excluding the impact on any outstanding warrants and New Warrants, John H. Ruiz, the CEO and founder of MSP, and Frank C. Quesada, the CLO of MSP, will together control approximately 92.58% of the combined voting power of the capital
stock of the Company (assuming no attributed ownership based on Messrs. Ruiz and Quesada’s investment in VRM) (See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” beginning on page [247]). Such ownership percentage will be affected by the level of redemptions by Public Stockholders and the exercise of outstanding warrants or New Warrants. See “Summary—Ownership of
the Post-Combination Company.”
|
Q:
|
WHY AM I RECEIVING THIS DOCUMENT?
|
A:
|
The Company is sending this proxy statement/prospectus to its stockholders to help them decide how to vote their shares of the
Company’s common stock with respect to the matters to be considered at the Special Meeting. The Business Combination cannot be completed unless Company stockholders approve the Business Combination Proposal, the Nasdaq Proposal, the
Charter Approval Proposal, the Incentive Plan Proposal and the Director Election Proposal set forth in this proxy statement/prospectus for their approval. Information about the Special Meeting, the Business Combination and the other
business to be considered by stockholders at the Special Meeting is contained in this proxy statement/prospectus. This document constitutes a proxy statement of the Company and a prospectus of the Company. It is a proxy statement because
the LCAP Board is soliciting proxies from its stockholders using this proxy statement/prospectus. It is a prospectus because the Company is offering the New Warrants in connection with the Business Combination. See “Membership Interest Purchase Agreement.”
|
Q:
|
WHAT WILL MSP’S MEMBERS RECEIVE IN THE BUSINESS COMBINATION?
|
A:
|
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the MIPA, the aggregate consideration to be paid to the Members (or their
designees) will consist of (i) 3,250,000,000 Up-C Units or, pursuant to notice delivered to the Company, with respect to all or a portion of the Up-C Units to be received by each such Member, one share of Class A Common Stock in lieu of
each Up-C Unit and (ii) rights to receive payments under the tax receivable agreement to be entered into at the Closing. Of the Up-C Units to be issued to certain Members at Closing, 6,000,000 will be deposited into an escrow account with
Continental Stock Transfer and Trust Company to satisfy any indemnification claims that may be brought pursuant to the MIPA.
|
Q:
|
WHEN DO YOU EXPECT THE BUSINESS COMBINATION TO BE COMPLETED?
|
A:
|
It is currently anticipated that the Business Combination will be consummated promptly following the Special Meeting, which is
set for [ ], 2022; however, such meeting could be adjourned, as described herein. Neither the Company nor MSP can assure you of when or if the Business Combination will be completed and it is possible that factors outside of the control
of both companies could result in the Business Combination being completed at a different time or not at all. Prior to the Closing, the Company must obtain the approval of its stockholders for certain of the proposals set forth in this
proxy statement/prospectus for their approval and the Company and MSP must obtain certain necessary regulatory approvals and satisfy other closing conditions. See “The Membership Interest Purchase
Agreement — Conditions to the Business Combination” beginning on page [223].
|
Q:
|
WHAT HAPPENS IF THE BUSINESS COMBINATION IS NOT COMPLETED?
|
A:
|
If the Business Combination Proposal is not approved and we do not consummate a business combination by August 18, 2022, we
will be required to dissolve and liquidate our Trust Account, unless we amend our current certificate of incorporation (which requires the affirmative vote of the holders of 65% of all then outstanding shares of common stock) and amend
certain other agreements into which we have entered to extend the life of the Company.
|
Q:
|
HOW WILL THE COMPANY BE MANAGED AND GOVERNED FOLLOWING THE BUSINESS COMBINATION?
|
A:
|
The Company does not currently have any management-level employees other than Ophir Sternberg, our Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer, Paul Rapisarda, our Chief Financial Officer, and Faquiry Diaz Cala, our Chief Operating Officer. Following the Closing, the Company’s executive officers are expected to be the current management team of MSP. See “Management of the Post-Combination Company Following the Business Combination” for more information.
|
Q:
|
WHAT EQUITY STAKE WILL CURRENT STOCKHOLDERS, THE INITIAL STOCKHOLDERS, AND THE MEMBERS HOLD IN THE
POST-COMBINATION COMPANY?
|
A:
|
It is anticipated that, upon completion of the Business Combination, and assuming (1) the no redemption scenario and (2) that
the holders of the Company’s existing Public Warrants and Private Warrants exercise those warrants, and no New Warrants are exercised: (i) the Public Stockholders will retain approximately 0.4% of the common stock of the Post-Combination
Company; (ii) the Initial Stockholders will retain approximately 0.2% of the common stock of the Post-Combination Company; and (iii) the Members (or their designees) will acquire
|
Q:
|
FOLLOWING THE BUSINESS COMBINATION, WILL THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK CONTINUE TO TRADE ON A STOCK EXCHANGE?
|
A:
|
Yes. We intend to apply to continue the listing of our publicly traded Class A Common Stock and Public Warrants on Nasdaq under
the symbols “MSPR” and “LCAPW,” respectively, and apply to list the New Warrants under the symbol “MSPRW,” upon the closing of the Business Combination. If issued, the New Warrants are expected to trade promptly following their issuance.
At the Closing, each Unit will separate into its components, comprising one share of Class A Common Stock and one-half of one Public Warrant. Following the Closing, we intend to change our name from “Lionheart Acquisition Corporation II”
to “MSP Recovery, Inc.”
|
Q:
|
WHAT ARE THE PRINCIPAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE COMPANY’S CLASS A COMMON STOCK AND CLASS V COMMON STOCK?
|
A:
|
Each holder of record of Class A Common Stock and Class V Common Stock on the relevant record date will be entitled to cast one
vote for each share of Class A Common Stock or Class V Common Stock, respectively. Holders of the Class V Common Stock will not have any of the economic rights (including rights to dividends and distributions upon liquidation) provided to
holders of the Class A Common Stock. For more information, please see the section entitled “Description of Securities.”
|
Q:
|
WHAT CONDITIONS MUST BE SATISFIED TO COMPLETE THE BUSINESS COMBINATION?
|
A:
|
There are a number of closing conditions in the MIPA, including the approval by the stockholders of the Company of the Business
Combination Proposal, the Nasdaq Proposal, the Charter Approval Proposal, the Director Election Proposal and the Incentive Plan Proposal. For a summary of the conditions that must be satisfied or waived prior to completion of the Business
Combination, please see the section entitled “Membership Interest Purchase Agreement.”
|
Q:
|
WHEN AND WHERE IS THE SPECIAL MEETING?
|
A:
|
The Special Meeting will be held at a.m. Eastern Time, on , 2022 in virtual format. The Special Meeting can be accessed by
visiting [•], where Company stockholders will be able to listen to the meeting live and vote during the meeting. Additionally, Company stockholders have the option to listen to the Special Meeting by dialing [•] (toll-free within the U.S.
and Canada) or [•] (outside of the U.S. and Canada, standard rates apply). The passcode for telephone access is [•], but please note that Company stockholders who choose to participate telephonically cannot vote or ask questions. Company
stockholders who wish to join the Special Meeting telephonically may be counted as present, vote at and examine the list of Company stockholders entitled to vote at the Special Meeting by visiting and entering the control number included
in the proxy card, voting instruction form or notice included in their proxy materials.
|
Q:
|
WHAT AM I BEING ASKED TO VOTE ON AND WHY IS THIS APPROVAL NECESSARY?
|
A:
|
Company stockholders are being asked to vote on the following:
|
•
|
A proposal to adopt the MIPA and the transactions contemplated thereby. See the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — The Business Combination Proposal.”
|
•
|
A proposal to approve, for purposes of complying with applicable listing rules of Nasdaq the issuance of more than 20% of the
issued and outstanding common stock of the Company and voting power in connection with the Business Combination. See the section entitled “Proposal No. 2 — The Nasdaq Proposal.”
|
•
|
A proposal to adopt the Proposed Charter in the form attached hereto as Annex B. See
the section entitled “Proposal No. 3 — The Charter Approval Proposal.”
|
•
|
Five separate proposals with respect to certain governance provisions in the Proposed Charter, which are being separately
presented in accordance with SEC requirements and which will be voted upon on a non-binding advisory basis.
|
○
|
Proposal No. 4A: Change in Authorized Shares—To (i) increase the Company’s total number of authorized shares of capital stock from 111,000,000 shares to 8,760,000,000 shares of capital stock, (ii) increase the Company’s authorized Class A Common Stock from 100,000,000
shares to 5,500,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, (iii) create the Class V Common Stock, consisting of 3,250,000,000 authorized shares of Class V Common Stock and (iv) increase the Company’s authorized shares of Preferred Stock
from 1,000,000 to 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock.
|
○
|
Proposal No. 4B: Dual-Class Stock—To
provide for a capital structure pursuant to which, subject to applicable law and the rights, if any, of the holders of any outstanding series of Preferred Stock, the holders of outstanding shares of common stock of the Company will vote
together as a single class on all matters with respect to which stockholders of the Company are entitled to vote under applicable law, the Proposed Charter or the Amended and Restated Bylaws, or upon which a vote of the stockholders
generally entitled to vote is otherwise duly called for by the Company; provided, however, that except as may otherwise be required by applicable law, each holder of outstanding shares of common stock of the Company will not be entitled
to vote on any amendment to the Proposed Charter that relates solely to the terms of one or more outstanding series of Preferred Stock (including, without limitation, the powers (including voting powers), if any, preferences and
relative, participating, optional, special or other rights, if any, and the qualifications, limitations and restrictions, if any, of such series of Preferred Stock), if the holders of such affected series are entitled, either voting
separately as a single class or together as a class with the holders of any other outstanding series of Preferred Stock, to vote thereon pursuant to the Proposed Charter or the DGCL. In each such vote, the holders of Class A Common
Stock and holders of Class V Common Stock will be entitled to one vote per share of Class A Common Stock or Class V Common Stock, respectively, including the election of directors and significant corporate transactions (such as a merger
or other sale of the Company or its assets).
|
○
|
Proposal No. 4C: Removal of Directors—To
provide that any director or the entire Board may be removed (i) at any time prior to the Voting Rights Threshold Date by a simple majority voting together as a single class, with or without cause, notwithstanding the classification of
the Board, and (ii) at any time from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date, solely for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 662∕3% of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares of the Corporation generally entitled to vote thereon, voting together as a single class.
|
○
|
Proposal No. 4D: Required Stockholder Vote to Amend Certain Sections of the
Proposed Charter—To provide that, from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date, in addition to any affirmative vote required by applicable law, the approval by affirmative vote of the holders of
at least 662∕3% in voting power of the then outstanding shares of the Company generally entitled to vote is
required to make any amendment to Article Seventh (Board of Directors) or Article Eighth (Written Consent of Stockholders) of the Proposed Charter.
|
○
|
Proposal No 4E: Required Stockholder Vote to Amend the Amended and Restated
Bylaws—To provide that, in addition to any affirmative vote required by the Proposed Charter, any bylaw that is to be made, altered, amended or repealed by the stockholders of the Company shall
receive, at any time (i) prior to the Voting Rights Threshold Date, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority in voting power of the then outstanding shares of the Company generally entitled to vote, voting
|
•
|
A proposal to elect seven directors to serve on the Board until the first annual meeting of stockholders following the Business
Combination, in the case of Class I directors, the second annual meeting of stockholders following the Business Combination, in the case of Class II directors, and the third annual meeting of stockholders following the Business
Combination, in the case of Class III directors, and, in each case, until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified. See the section entitled “Proposal No. 5 — The Director Election
Proposal.”
|
•
|
A proposal to approve and adopt the MSP Recovery, Inc. 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Annex J. See the section entitled “Proposal No. 6 — The Incentive Plan Proposal.”
|
•
|
A proposal to approve the adjournment of the Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, (A) to ensure that any
supplement or amendment to the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus that the LCAP Board has determined in good faith is required by applicable law to be disclosed to Company stockholders and for such supplement or amendment to be
promptly disseminated to Company stockholders prior to the Special Meeting, (B) if, as of the time for which the Special Meeting is originally scheduled, there are insufficient shares of common stock represented (either in person or by
proxy) to constitute a quorum necessary to conduct business at the Special Meeting or (C) to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies if there are insufficient votes for, or otherwise in connection with, the approval of the
Business Combination Proposal, the Nasdaq Proposal, the Charter Approval Proposal, the Director Election Proposal or the Incentive Plan Proposal. See the section entitled “Proposal No. 7 — The Adjournment
Proposal.”
|
Q:
|
ARE THE PROPOSALS CONDITIONED ON ONE ANOTHER?
|
A:
|
Yes. The Closing is conditioned on the approval of each of the Business Combination Proposal, the Nasdaq Proposal, the Charter
Approval Proposal, the Director Election Proposal and the Incentive Plan Proposal at the Special Meeting, subject to the terms of the MIPA. If any of these proposals are not approved, we will not consummate the Business Combination. If
the Business Combination Proposal is not approved, the other Proposals (except the Adjournment Proposal, as described below) will not be presented to the stockholders for a vote. The Adjournment Proposal is not conditioned on the approval
of any other proposal set forth in this proxy statement/prospectus. If we do not consummate the Business Combination and fail to complete an initial business combination by August 18, 2022, we will be required to dissolve and liquidate
our Trust Account by returning the then remaining funds in such account to the Public Stockholders.
|
Q:
|
WHAT IS MSP’S BUSINESS?
|
A:
|
MSP is a healthcare recovery and data analytics company. MSP has also developed software that solves many of the issues
currently being experienced by doctors, hospitals as well as other healthcare practitioners as well as payers within the healthcare system. The MSP systems provide a platform for providers to identify proper payers at the time of patient
encounter and to collect payment more quickly, at higher amounts. MSP’s agreements allow for MSP to monetize the claims that are processed and properly identified. MSP has also identified systemic issues relating to police reporting at
the time of auto accidents and is developing software to solve these issues. This software system, using blockchain technology, will involve proper capture of data to help first responders to identify health conditions at the scene of
accidents and transmit that data for improved patient care. MSP’s system will also enable individuals to access their health care data, which will be encrypted and stored and accessed through a cloud. Individuals can then choose to grant
immediate data access to their healthcare practitioners, for healthcare services based on up-to-date patient medical information. MSP’s business model includes two principal lines of business: (a) claims recovery and (b) “chase to pay”
services. First, through the claims recovery services, MSP acquires claims from its Assignors and utilizes its data analytics services to identify improper payments for healthcare services. After identifying improper payments, MSP then
seeks to recover the amounts owed to its Assignors from those parties who, under applicable law or contract,
|
Q:
|
WHY IS THE COMPANY PROPOSING THE BUSINESS COMBINATION?
|
A:
|
The Company was organized to effect a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization, or
other similar business combination with one or more businesses or entities.
|
Q:
|
DID THE LCAP BOARD OBTAIN A FAIRNESS OPINION IN DETERMINING WHETHER OR NOT TO PROCEED WITH THE BUSINESS
COMBINATION?
|
A:
|
No. Neither the LCAP Board nor any committee thereof is required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking or
accounting firm that the Business Combination is fair to us from a financial point of view. Neither the LCAP Board nor any committee thereof obtained a third-party valuation in connection with the Business Combination. In analyzing the
Business Combination, the Company and its representatives and professional advisors conducted extensive due diligence on MSP and the financial terms set forth in the MIPA. Based on the foregoing, the LCAP Board unanimously determined that
the Business Combination was fair and advisable to, and in the best interest of, the Company and its stockholders.
|
Q:
|
WHY IS THE COMPANY PROVIDING STOCKHOLDERS WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE ON THE BUSINESS COMBINATION?
|
A:
|
We are seeking approval of the Business Combination for purposes of complying with our Existing Charter and applicable Nasdaq
listing rules requiring stockholder approval of issuances of more than 20% of a listed company’s issued and outstanding common stock and voting power. In addition, pursuant to the Existing Charter, we must provide all Public Stockholders
with the opportunity to redeem all or a portion of their Public Shares upon the consummation of an initial business combination (as defined in our Existing Charter), either in conjunction with a tender offer or in conjunction with a
stockholder vote to approve such initial business combination. If we submit an initial business combination to the stockholders for their approval, our Existing Charter requires us to conduct a redemption offer in conjunction with the
proxy solicitation (and not in conjunction with a tender offer) pursuant to the applicable SEC proxy solicitation rules.
|
Q:
|
DO MSP’S MEMBERS NEED TO APPROVE THE BUSINESS COMBINATION?
|
A:
|
Although the Closing is subject to various actions by the Members, the Members are each party to the MIPA and, as such, have
already provided their approval for the Business Combination in their capacity as equityholders of the MSP Purchased Companies.
|
Q:
|
DO I HAVE REDEMPTION RIGHTS?
|
A:
|
If you are a holder of Public Shares, you have the right to demand that the Company redeem such shares for a pro rata portion
of the cash held in the Trust Account, which holds the proceeds of the IPO, as of two business days prior to the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Proposal (including interest earned on the funds
held in the Trust Account and not previously released to the Company to pay taxes) upon the Closing (“Redemption Rights”).
|
Q:
|
WILL MY VOTE AFFECT MY ABILITY TO EXERCISE REDEMPTION RIGHTS?
|
A:
|
No. You may exercise your redemption rights whether you vote your Public Shares for or against, or whether you abstain from
voting on, the Business Combination Proposal or any other Proposal described in this proxy statement/prospectus. As a result, the Business Combination Proposal can be approved by stockholders who will redeem their Public Shares and no
longer remain stockholders, and the Business Combination may be consummated even though the funds available from the Trust Account and the number of Public Stockholders are substantially reduced as a result of redemptions by Public
Stockholders.
|
Q:
|
HOW DO I EXERCISE MY REDEMPTION RIGHTS?
|
A:
|
In order to exercise your redemption rights, you must (i) if you hold Public Units, separate the underlying Public Shares and
Public Warrants, and (ii) prior to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on, [•], 2022 (two business days before the Special Meeting), tender your shares physically or electronically and submit a request in writing that we redeem your Public Shares for
cash to Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, our transfer agent (“Transfer Agent”), at the following address:
|
Q:
|
DO I HAVE APPRAISAL RIGHTS IF I OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED BUSINESS COMBINATION?
|
A:
|
No. The Company’s stockholders do not have appraisal rights in connection with the Business Combination under the DGCL. See the
section entitled “Appraisal Rights.”
|
Q:
|
WHAT HAPPENS TO THE FUNDS DEPOSITED IN THE TRUST ACCOUNT AFTER CONSUMMATION OF THE BUSINESS COMBINATION?
|
A:
|
A total of $230.0 million in net proceeds of the IPO was placed in the Trust Account following the IPO. After consummation
of the Business Combination, the funds in the Trust Account will be used to pay holders of the Public Shares who exercise redemption rights, to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Business Combination (including
aggregate fees of up to $8,050,000 as deferred underwriting commissions) and for the Post-Combination Company’s working capital and general corporate purposes. Approximately $109,469,789 was withdrawn out of the Trust Account to pay for
the 10,946,269 shares of the Company's Class A Common Stock that were redeemed in connection with the Extension Amendment. We currently have approximately $120.5 million remaining in our Trust Account to consummate a business
combination or to fund any additional redemptions that could be requested as more fully provided herein.
|
Q:
|
WHAT HAPPENS IF THE BUSINESS COMBINATION IS NOT CONSUMMATED?
|
A:
|
There are certain circumstances under which the MIPA may be terminated. Please see the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Business Combination Proposal — MIPA” for information regarding the parties’ specific termination rights.
|
Q:
|
HOW DO THE SPONSOR, AND OUR DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS INTEND TO VOTE ON THE PROPOSALS?
|
A:
|
The Sponsor and the Company’s directors and officers are entitled to vote an aggregate of 34.7% of the outstanding shares of
common stock (which includes the Founder Shares and the Private Shares). The Company has entered into a letter agreement with the Sponsor and our directors and officers pursuant to which, among other things, each such person has agreed
to vote all shares of our common stock owned by them in favor of the Proposals. However, we intend to waive such obligations of the Sponsor, our directors and/or our officers to vote their shares of common stock in favor of the
Proposals in respect of any shares purchased by such purchasers in Open Market Purchases. Nomura, the underwriter of our IPO, has agreed to vote shares of our common stock held by it in favor of the Business Combination. However, we
intend to waive such obligations of Nomura to vote their shares of common stock in favor of the Proposals in respect of any shares purchased by Nomura in Open Market Purchases. As a result, in addition to the shares of common stock held
by Nomura, the Sponsor and our officers and directors, we may need only [•], or [•]% (assuming all outstanding shares are voted), or [•], or approximately [•]% (assuming only the minimum number of shares representing a quorum are
voted), of the Public Shares to be voted in favor of the Business Combination Proposal (assuming only a quorum is present at the Special Meeting) in order to have the Business Combination Proposal approved.
|
Q:
|
WHAT CONSTITUTES A QUORUM AT THE SPECIAL MEETING?
|
A:
|
A majority of the voting power of the common stock entitled to vote at the Special Meeting must be present, in person or
represented by proxy at the Special Meeting to constitute a quorum and in order to conduct business at the Special Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present for the purpose of determining a quorum. Nomura, the
Sponsor and our directors and officers, who collectively currently own 43.0% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock, will count towards this quorum. In the absence of a quorum, the chairman of the Special Meeting has power
to adjourn the Special Meeting. As of the Record Date for the Special Meeting, [•] shares of common stock would be required to be present in person or represented by proxy to achieve a quorum.
|
Q:
|
WHAT VOTE IS REQUIRED TO APPROVE EACH PROPOSAL AT THE SPECIAL MEETING?
|
A:
|
The Business Combination Proposal: The approval of the Business Combination Proposal
requires the affirmative vote (in person or by proxy) of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock entitled to vote and actually cast thereon at the Special Meeting, voting as a single class.
Accordingly, a stockholder’s failure to submit a proxy or to vote in person at the Special Meeting, as well as an abstention from voting and a broker non-vote with regard to the Business Combination Proposal, will have no effect on the
Business Combination Proposal. Company stockholders must approve the Business Combination Proposal in order for the Business Combination to occur.
|
Q:
|
DO ANY OF THE COMPANY’S OFFICERS OR DIRECTORS HAVE INTERESTS IN THE BUSINESS COMBINATION THAT MAY DIFFER FROM
OR BE IN ADDITION TO THE INTERESTS OF STOCKHOLDERS?
|
A:
|
The Sponsor and our directors and officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from or in addition to
(and which may conflict with) your interests. You should take these interests into account in deciding whether to approve the Proposals. These interests include:
|
•
|
the fact that our Initial Stockholders have agreed not to redeem any of the Founder Shares in connection with a stockholder
vote to approve the proposed Business Combination;
|
•
|
the fact that Ophir Sternberg, Thomas W. Hawkins and Roger Meltzer will serve as directors of the Post-Combination Company;
|
•
|
the fact that the Sponsor paid an aggregate of $25,000 for 5,000,000 Founder Shares in January 2020 and, in February 2020, the
Company declared a stock dividend of 0.15 share for each Founder Share outstanding, resulting in the Sponsor holding an aggregate of 5,750,000 Founder Shares. After giving effect to the sales or transfer of Founder Shares to Nomura and in
connection with the IPO to certain insiders, the remaining 5,667,500 Founder Shares will have a significantly higher value at the time of the Business Combination, which if unrestricted and freely tradable would be valued at approximately
$56,675,000 but, given the restrictions on such shares, we believe such shares have less value;
|
•
|
the fact that our Initial Stockholders have agreed to waive their rights to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account
with respect to their Founder Shares if we fail to complete an initial business combination by August 18, 2022 (or such later date as may be approved by the Company’s stockholders);
|
•
|
the fact that our Initial Stockholders, being holders of Class A Common Stock, are eligible to receive the dividend comprised
of the New Warrants to be issued upon the automatic conversion of the Founder Shares at Closing, and the fact that, because our Initial Stockholders have agreed not to redeem their shares in connection with the Business Combination, they
may receive a significant number of such New Warrants, if other holders of Class A Common Stock elect to exercise their redemption rights;
|
•
|
the fact that the Sponsor paid an aggregate of $5,950,000 for Private Units comprised of 297,500 Private Warrants to purchase
shares of Class A Common Stock and that such Private Warrants will expire worthless if a business combination is not consummated by August 18, 2022;
|
•
|
the continued right of the Sponsor to hold Class A Common Stock and the shares of Class A Common Stock to be issued to the
Sponsor upon exercise of its Private Warrants following the Business Combination, subject to certain lock-up periods;
|
•
|
if the Trust Account is liquidated, including in the event we are unable to complete an initial business combination within the
required time period, the Sponsor has agreed to indemnify us to ensure that the proceeds in the Trust Account are not reduced below $10.00 per Public Share, or such lesser per Public Share amount as is in the Trust Account on the
liquidation date, by the claims of prospective target businesses with which we have entered into an acquisition agreement or claims of any third party (other than our independent public accountants) for services rendered or products sold
to us, but only if such a vendor or target business has not executed a waiver of any and all rights to seek access to the Trust Account;
|
•
|
the Sponsor (including its representatives and affiliates) and the Company directors and officers, are, or may in the future
become, affiliated with entities that are engaged in a similar business to the Company. For example, each of the Company’s officers may be considered an affiliate of the Sponsor, the Sponsor and our directors and officers of the Company
are also affiliated with Lionheart III and Lionheart IV, all of which are blank check companies incorporated for the purpose of effecting their respective initial business combinations. In addition, Mr. Meltzer serves on the board of
directors of Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III, a blank check company incorporated for the purpose of effecting a business combination. The Sponsor and the Company’s directors and officers are not prohibited from sponsoring, or otherwise
becoming involved with, any other blank check companies prior to the Company completing its initial business combination. Moreover, certain of the Company’s directors and officers have time and attention requirements for certain other
companies. The Company’s directors and officers also may become aware of business opportunities which may be appropriate for presentation to the Company, and the other entities to which they owe certain fiduciary or contractual duties,
including Lionheart III and Lionheart IV.
|
•
|
the fact that Ophir Sternberg and John Ruiz have certain business dealings tied to shares of the Post-Combination Company. For
more information, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions”;
|
•
|
the continued indemnification of our existing directors and officers and the continuation of our directors’ and officers’
liability insurance after the Business Combination;
|
•
|
the fact that the Sponsor and our directors and officers will lose their entire investment in us and will not be reimbursed for
any out-of-pocket expenses if an initial business combination is not consummated by August 18, 2022; and
|
•
|
that, at the closing of the Business Combination we will enter into the amended and restated registration rights agreement
(“Registration Rights Agreement”), substantially in the form attached as Annex E to this proxy statement/prospectus, with the Sponsor and our directors and officers, which provides for
registration rights to such persons and their permitted transferees.
|
Q:
|
WHAT DO I NEED TO DO NOW?
|
A:
|
The Company urges you to read carefully and consider the information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus, including
the Annexes and the other documents referred to herein, and to consider how the Business Combination will affect you as a stockholder of the Company. Stockholders should then vote as soon as possible in accordance with the instructions
provided in this proxy statement/prospectus and on the enclosed proxy card.
|
Q:
|
WHAT HAPPENS IF I SELL MY SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK BEFORE THE SPECIAL MEETING?
|
A:
|
The Record Date for the Special Meeting is earlier than the date that the Business Combination is expected to be completed. If
you transfer your shares of Class A Common Stock after the Record Date, but before the Special Meeting, unless the transferee obtains from you a proxy to vote those shares, you will retain your right to vote at the Special Meeting.
However, you will not be able to seek redemption of your shares of Class A Common Stock because you will no longer be able to tender them prior to the Special Meeting in accordance with the provisions described herein. If you transferred
your shares of Class A Common Stock prior to the Record Date, you have no right to vote those shares at the Special Meeting or redeem those shares for a pro rata portion of the proceeds held in the Trust Account.
|
Q:
|
HOW DO I VOTE?
|
A:
|
If you are a holder of record of common stock on the Record Date, you may vote in person at the Special Meeting by attending
the meeting virtually or by submitting a proxy for the Special Meeting. You may submit your proxy by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the accompanying pre-addressed postage paid envelope. You may also
vote by telephone or Internet by following the instructions printed on the proxy card.
|
Q:
|
IF MY SHARES ARE HELD IN “STREET NAME” BY A BROKER, BANK, OR OTHER NOMINEE, WILL MY BROKER, BANK, OR OTHER
NOMINEE VOTE MY SHARES FOR ME?
|
A:
|
If your shares are held in “street name” in a stock brokerage account or by a broker, bank, or other nominee, you must provide
the record holder of your shares with instructions on how to vote your shares. Please follow the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank, or other nominee. Please note that you may not vote shares held in “street name” by
returning a proxy card directly to the Company or by voting in person at the Special Meeting unless you provide a “legal proxy,” which you must obtain from your broker, bank, or other nominee.
|
Q:
|
WHAT IF I ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING AND ABSTAIN OR DO NOT VOTE?
|
A:
|
For purposes of the Special Meeting, an abstention occurs when a stockholder attends the meeting in person and does not vote or
returns a proxy with an “abstain” vote.
|
Q:
|
WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF I RETURN MY PROXY CARD WITHOUT INDICATING HOW TO VOTE?
|
A:
|
If you are a holder of record of common stock on the Record Date and you sign and return your proxy card without indicating how
to vote on any particular Proposal, the common stock represented by your proxy will be voted “FOR” each of the Proposals presented at the Special Meeting.
|
Q:
|
MAY I CHANGE MY VOTE AFTER I HAVE MAILED MY SIGNED PROXY CARD?
|
A:
|
Yes. If you are a holder of record of common stock on the Record Date, you may change your vote at any time before your proxy
is exercised by doing any one of the following:
|
•
|
send another proxy card with a later date;
|
•
|
notify the Company’s Secretary in writing before the Special Meeting that you have revoked your proxy; or
|
•
|
attend the Special Meeting and vote electronically by visiting and entering the control number found on your proxy card, voting
instruction form or notice you previously received.
|
Q:
|
WHAT HAPPENS IF I FAIL TO TAKE ANY ACTION WITH RESPECT TO THE SPECIAL MEETING?
|
A:
|
If you fail to take any action with respect to the Special Meeting and the Business Combination is approved by stockholders and
consummated, you will become a stockholder of the Post-Combination Company. Failure to take any action with respect to the Special Meeting will not affect your ability to exercise your redemption rights. If you fail to take any action
with respect to the Special Meeting and the Business Combination is not approved, you will continue to be a stockholder of the Company while the Company searches for another target business with which to complete a business combination.
If you fail to vote on the Charter Approval Proposal, your failure to vote will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” such proposal.
|
Q:
|
WHAT SHOULD I DO IF I RECEIVE MORE THAN ONE SET OF VOTING MATERIALS?
|
A:
|
Stockholders may receive more than one set of voting materials, including multiple copies of this proxy statement/prospectus
and multiple proxy cards or voting instruction cards. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you will receive a separate voting instruction card for each brokerage account in which you hold shares. If you
are a holder of record and your shares are registered in more than one name, you will receive more than one proxy card. Please complete, sign, date and return each proxy card and voting instruction card that you receive in order to cast a
vote with respect to all of your shares.
|
Q:
|
WHO CAN HELP ANSWER MY QUESTIONS?
|
A:
|
If you have questions about the Business Combination or if you need additional copies of the proxy statement/prospectus or the
enclosed proxy card you should contact our proxy solicitor, MacKenzie Partners, Inc.:
|
|
| |
Redemption Threshold(1)(2)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |
No Redemption(3)
|
| |
Illustrative Redemption(4)
|
| |
Expense Adjusted
Maximum Redemption(5)
|
| |
Maximum Redemption(6)
|
||||||||||||
|
| |
Shares
|
| |
%
|
| |
Shares
|
| |
%
|
| |
Shares
|
| |
%
|
| |
Shares
|
| |
%
|
Class A - LCAP Public Stockholders and holders of Private
Shares(7)(8)
|
| |
12,703,631
|
| |
0.4%
|
| |
10,002,838
|
| |
0.3%
|
| |
7,302,044
|
| |
0.2%
|
| |
650,000
|
| |
0.0%
|
Class A - LCAP Initial Stockholders(7)(8)
|
| |
5,750,000
|
| |
0.2%
|
| |
5,750,000
|
| |
0.2%
|
| |
5,750,000
|
| |
0.2%
|
| |
5,750,000
|
| |
0.2%
|
Class A - LCAP Private and Public Warrantholders
|
| |
11,825,000
|
| |
0.4%
|
| |
11,825,000
|
| |
0.4%
|
| |
11,825,000
|
| |
0.4%
|
| |
11,825,000
|
| |
0.4%
|
Total LCAP(7)(8)
|
| |
30,278,631
|
| |
0.9%
|
| |
27,577,838
|
| |
0.8%
|
| |
24,877,044
|
| |
0.8%
|
| |
18,225,500
|
| |
0.6%
|
Class V - MSP Recovery Members (or their designees)(9)
|
| |
2,628,037,909
|
| |
80.1%
|
| |
2,628,037,909
|
| |
80.2%
|
| |
2,628,037,909
|
| |
80.2%
|
| |
2,628,037,909
|
| |
80.4%
|
Class V - Virage; VRM(10)
|
| |
140,000,000
|
| |
4.3%
|
| |
140,000,000
|
| |
4.3%
|
| |
140,000,000
|
| |
4.3%
|
| |
140,000,000
|
| |
4.3%
|
Class V – Other(9)
|
| |
65,662,091
|
| |
2.0%
|
| |
65,662,091
|
| |
2.0%
|
| |
65,662,091
|
| |
2.0%
|
| |
65,662,091
|
| |
2.0%
|
Class V - Series MRCS
|
| |
416,300,000
|
| |
12.8%
|
| |
416,300,000
|
| |
12.8%
|
| |
416,300,000
|
| |
12.7%
|
| |
416,300,000
|
| |
12.8%
|
Total MSP and Other Unrelated Parties(8)
|
| |
3,250,000,000
|
| |
99.1%
|
| |
3,250,000,000
|
| |
99.2%
|
| |
3,250,000,000
|
| |
99.2%
|
| |
3,250,000,000
|
| |
99.4%
|
Total Shares at Closing(8)
|
| |
3,280,278,631
|
| |
100.0%
|
| |
3,277,577,838
|
| |
100.0%
|
| |
3,274,877,044
|
| |
100.0%
|
| |
3,268,225,000
|
| |
100.0%
|
Additional Dilution
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
New Warrants(9)
|
| |
—
|
| |
—%
|
| |
—
|
| |
—%
|
| |
—
|
| |
—%
|
| |
—
|
| |
—%
|
Incentive Plan(11)
|
| |
98,736,750
|
| |
3.0%
|
| |
98,736,750
|
| |
3.0%
|
| |
98,736,750
|
| |
3.0%
|
| |
98,736,750
|
| |
3.0%
|
Total Additional Dilution Sources
|
| |
98,736,750
|
| |
3.0%
|
| |
98,736,750
|
| |
3.0%
|
| |
98,736,750
|
| |
3.0%
|
| |
98,736,750
|
| |
3.0%
|
(1)
|
Only 12,053,631 shares of Class A Common Stock are subject to redemption (after giving effect to the redemption of 10,946,369
shares of Class A Common Stock in connection with the Company stockholder vote to approve the Extension Amendment). The remaining 650,000 shares of Class A Common Stock are held by holders of Private Shares who have waived their
redemption rights pursuant to applicable subscription agreements.
|
(2)
|
Class A Common Stock are economic shares and entitled to one vote per share. Class V Common Stock are non-economic and
entitled to one vote per share.
|
(3)
|
Assumes that no additional shares of Class A Common Stock are redeemed (after giving effect to the redemption of 10,946,369
shares of Class A Common Stock in connection with the Company stockholder vote to approve the Extension Amendment). Refer to the section titled “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information” in this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
(4)
|
Assumes 2,700,793 additional shares of Class A Common Stock are redeemed at a redemption price of $10.00 (after giving effect
to the redemption of 10,946,369 shares of Class A Common Stock in connection with the Company stockholder vote to approve the Extension Amendment), and represents a midpoint redemption scenario between the no redemption and expense
adjusted maximum redemption scenarios.
|
(5)
|
As noted in (1) above, only 12,053,631 shares of Class A Common Stock are subject to redemption. This assumes that the cash
available for maximum redemptions is calculated as the cash in trust less remaining transaction costs to be paid in cash of $66.5 million. This amount is divided by the estimated per share redemption price of approximately $10.00 per
share to obtain the number of shares to be redeemed. Refer to section titled “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information” in this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
(6)
|
Assumes all of the 12,053,631 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to redemption (after giving effect to the redemption of
10,946,369 shares of Class A Common Stock in connection with the Company stockholder vote to approve the Extension Amendment) are redeemed a redemption price of $10.00.
|
(7)
|
Shares exclude the approximately 1,029,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying the approximately 1,029,000,000 New
Warrants to be issued, conditioned upon the consummation of any redemptions by the holders of Class A Common Stock and the Closing, to the holders of record of the Class A Common Stock on the Closing Date (which is expected to include
the 5,750,000 shares of Class A Common Stock into which Founder Shares will convert in connection with the Business Combination), after giving effect to the waiver of the right, title and interest in, to or under, participation in any
such dividend by the Members, on behalf of themselves and any of their designees. See (9) below.
|
(8)
|
Pursuant to the terms of the LLC Agreement, at least twice a month, to the extent any New Warrants have been exercised in
accordance with their terms, the Company following the Business Combination is required to purchase from the MSP Principals, proportionately, the number of Up-C Units or shares of Class A Common Stock owned by such MSP Principal equal
to the Aggregate Exercise Price divided by the Warrant Exercise Price (as defined in the LLC Agreement) in exchange for the Aggregate Exercise Price. As a result, no additional dilution is expected from the exercise of the New Warrants.
The number of New Warrants to be distributed in respect of each share of unredeemed Class A Common Stock is
|
(9)
|
Assuming the value of the VRM Full Return as of December 31, 2021, of $656.6 million and a per unit value of $10.00 per Up-C
unit, Messrs. Ruiz and Quesada are expected may exchange their Up-C Units for shares of Class A Common Stock to be sold in satisfaction of the VRM Full Return, pursuant to the VRM Full Return Guaranty, their Up-C Units received as
consideration pursuant to the MIPA. Such amount includes 65,000,000 Up-C Units to be delivered as Reserved Shares and an additional 662,091 Up-C Units to be delivered and exchanged for shares of Class A Common Stock to be sold pursuant
to the VRM Full Return Guaranty. See “The Business Combination — Other Agreements — VRM Full Return Guaranty.”
|
(10)
|
Assumes 120,000,000 Up-C Units are issued to VRM as Upfront Consideration and includes an additional 20,000,000 Up-C Units to
be paid in connection with the Virage Exclusivity Termination from the aggregate consideration being paid to the Members (or their designees) pursuant to the MIPA at Closing.
|
(11)
|
Assumes issuance of all shares of Class A Common Stock reserved for initial issuance under the Incentive Plan equal to
98,736,750. In addition, under the terms of the Incentive Plan, the aggregate number of shares that may be issued pursuant to awards will be subject to an annual increase on January 1 of each calendar year (commencing with January 1,
2023 and ending on and including January 1, 2031) equal to the lesser of (i) a number of shares equal to 3% of the total number of shares actually issued and outstanding on the last day of the preceding fiscal year or (ii) a number of
shares as determined by the Board. Such increase in reserve may present an additional source of dilution. See “Proposal No. 6—Incentive Plan Proposal.”
|
|
| |
Redemption Threshold
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |
No Redemption
|
| |
Illustrative Redemption
|
| |
Expense Adjusted
Maximum Redemption
|
| |
Maximum Redemption
|
||||||||||||
|
| |
$/share
|
| |
%
|
| |
Amount
|
| |
%
|
| |
Amount
|
| |
%
|
| |
Amount
|
| |
%
|
Underwriting fee (inclusive of financial advisor fees)(1)
|
| |
$1.74
|
| |
17.39%
|
| |
$1.91
|
| |
19.09%
|
| |
$2.12
|
| |
21.16%
|
| |
$2.89
|
| |
28.89%
|
(1)
|
LCAP incurred $4.6 million of underwriting fees and $8.05 million in deferred underwriting fees in connection with its IPO,
which are payable to the underwriters in connection with the Business Combination and will not be adjusted for any shares that are redeemed. LCAP will also pay Nomura, in its role as financial advisor in connection with the Business
Combination, total fees of $20 million. In addition, MSP will pay KBW in its role as financial advisor in connection with the Business Combination total fees of $20 million. In total the underwriting fees (inclusive of fees to be paid
to financial advisors in connection with the Business Combination) will be $52.65 million.
|
(1)
|
The Members have a 50% ownership interest in each of MAO-MSO Recovery, LLC, MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC, MAO-MSO Recovery LLC,
Series FHCP and MAO-MSO Recovery II LLC, Series PMPI.
|
(1)
|
The Members (or their designees) will hold all of the Class B Units of Opco.
|
(2)
|
The Members (or their designees) will hold all of the shares of the Class V Common Stock of the Post-Combination Company,
which are voting, non-economic shares. The shares of Class V Common Stock, together with their accompanying Class B Units of Opco, are convertible on a one-for-one basis into shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock (or cash, at the
Post-Combination Company’s option), in accordance with the terms of the LLC Agreement.
|
(3)
|
The Initial Stockholders will hold 5,750,000 of the shares of Class A Common Stock of the Post-Combination Company. This
amount will be affected by the exercise of outstanding warrants or New Warrants. See “Summary—Ownership of the Post-Combination Company.”
|
(4)
|
The Public Stockholders and holders of Private Shares will hold 12,703,631 of the shares of Class A Common Stock of the
Post-Combination Company. This amount will be affected by the level of redemptions by Public Stockholders and the exercise of outstanding warrants or New Warrants. See “Summary—Ownership of the
Post-Combination Company.
|
(5)
|
The Post-Combination Company will hold all of the Class A Units of Opco.
|
(6)
|
The MSP Purchased Companies will own 50% of the membership interest in each of MAO-MSO Recovery, LLC, MAO MSO Recovery II,
LLC, MAO-MSO Recovery LLC, Series FHCP and MAO-MSO Recovery II LLC, Series PMPI.
|
•
|
Following a review of the financial data provided to the Company, including certain unaudited prospective financial
information of MSP (including, where applicable, the assumptions underlying such unaudited prospective financial information) and the Company’s due diligence review of MSP’s business, the LCAP Board determined that the consideration to
be paid to the Members was reasonable in light of such data and financial information.
|
•
|
The Company’s management and advisors conducted due diligence examinations of MSP, including: commercial, financial, legal
and regulatory due diligence, and extensive discussions with MSP’s management and the Company’s management and legal advisors concerning such due diligence examinations of MSP.
|
•
|
MSP’s business is based in a serviceable market that has a long-standing history of improper claim reimbursement concerns,
and that the LCAP Board considers attractive, and which, following a review of industry trends and other industry factors (including, among other things, historic and projected market growth), the LCAP Board believes has continued
growth potential in future periods.
|
•
|
Defensive, niche business model, coupled with a first mover advantage has led to MSP identifying more than $15 billion of
Paid Value of Potentially Recoverable Claims, as of the date of the MIPA, that could be recoverable in the near future.
|
•
|
The Members (or their designees) will control approximately 99.1% of the Post-Combination Company, assuming (1) the no
redemption scenario, (2) that the holders of the Company’s existing Public Warrants and Private Warrants exercise those warrants, and no New Warrants are exercised and (3) no attributed ownership based on Messrs. Ruiz and Quesada’s
investment in VRM (See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” beginning on page [247]). Such ownership percentage will be affected by the level of redemptions
by Public Stockholders and the exercise of outstanding warrants or New Warrants. See “Summary—Ownership of the Post-Combination Company.” The LCAP Board believes that the Members continuing to
own a substantial percentage of the Post-Combination Company on a pro forma basis reflects such equityholders’ belief in and commitment to the continued growth prospects of MSP going forward.
|
•
|
The agreement by Messrs. Ruiz and Quesada to be subject to a post-Closing lockup in respect of their Up-C Units and shares of
Class A Common Stock, subject to certain exceptions, and to enter into employment agreements with the Post-Combination Company, which is expected to provide important stability to the leadership and governance of MSP.
|
•
|
Opportunity to introduce an attractive asset class to public investors that has historically been transacted in private
market settings.
|
•
|
Driven MSP management with diverse experience and an entrepreneurial mindset to bring this asset class to the public markets.
|
•
|
The terms and conditions of the MIPA and the related agreements and the transactions contemplated thereby, each party’s
representations, warranties and covenants, the conditions to each party’s obligation to consummate the Business Combination and the termination provisions, as well as the strong commitment by both the Company and MSP to complete the
Business Combination.
|
•
|
After a review of other business combination opportunities reasonably available to the Company, the LCAP Board believes that
the proposed Business Combination represents the best potential business combination reasonably available to the Company taking into consideration, among other things, the timing and likelihood of accomplishing the goals of any
alternatives.
|
•
|
MSP’s unique social focus on supporting the long-term sustainability of Medicare and Medicaid programs relied upon by over
100 million Americans.
|
•
|
Proprietary data system that has proven experience aggregating, normalizing and analyzing large volumes of data to identify
recoverable healthcare claims.
|
•
|
John H. Ruiz and Frank C. Quesada are key business drivers of MSP and the success of MSP remains highly dependent on their
continued involvement.
|
•
|
The potential benefits of the Business Combination may not be fully achieved or may not be achieved within the expected
timeframe.
|
•
|
Validity of the claim assignments, legal standing of the MSP claims, penalties and double damages provisions, and several
other key legal issues remain subject to continued affirmation in the U.S. court system.
|
•
|
Medicare Secondary Payer Act of 1980 still remains subject to legal interpretation and potential revision.
|
•
|
While the MSP management has modeled the expected operating expenses, they have not previously operated at a scale indicated
in the MSP management projections nor executed on the scale of growth contemplated.
|
•
|
The Company’s stockholders may fail to approve the proposals necessary to effect the Business Combination.
|
•
|
The completion of the Business Combination is conditioned on the satisfaction of certain closing conditions that are not
within the Company’s control, including the receipt of certain required regulatory approvals.
|
•
|
The Public Stockholders will hold a minority position in the Post-Combination Company (approximately 0.4%, assuming (1) the
no redemption scenario and (2) that the holders of the Company’s existing Public Warrants and Private Warrants exercise those warrants, and no New Warrants are exercised), as such, the Company’s current stockholders are unlikely to have
an influence on the management of the Post-Combination Company. Such ownership percentage will be affected by the level of redemptions by Public Stockholders and the exercise of outstanding warrants or New Warrants. See “Summary—Ownership of the Post-Combination Company.
|
•
|
Legal due diligence review from the Company’s advisor raised concerns over internal controls and documentation related to
HIPAA compliance and data protection.
|
•
|
Public investors often rely on a PIPE investor for third party validation of valuation. The Business Combination lacks a
validating PIPE investor.
|
•
|
The challenges associated with preparing MSP, which is a private company, for the applicable disclosure and listing
requirements to which MSP will be subject as a publicly traded company.
|
•
|
As of the date the LCAP Board approved the Business Combination, MSP did not have any combined or consolidated historical
financial statements, and therefore the LCAP Board could not consider MSP’s historical financial results or historical and current balance sheet information in conjunction with its consideration of other financial information of MSP in
making its determination. Once MSP’s audited financial statements became available, the LCAP Board reviewed the audited financial statements in conjunction with the other unaudited financial data available to it and continued to
recommend the Business Combination. See “Risk Factors—The Sponsor, certain members of the LCAP Board and our officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from or are in
addition to other stockholders in recommending that stockholders vote in favor of approval of the Business Combination Proposal and approval of the other proposals described in this proxy statement.
|
•
|
The possibility that the SPAC market experiences volatility and disruptions, causing deal disruption.
|
•
|
The risks and costs to the Company if the Business Combination is not completed, including the risk of diverting management
focus and resources from other business combination opportunities, which could result in the Company being unable to effect an initial business combination by August 18, 2022.
|
•
|
The LCAP Board did not obtain a third-party valuation or fairness opinion in connection with the Business Combination.
|
•
|
The fees and expenses associated with completing the Business Combination. In addition, the LCAP Board considered the fact
that Nomura has contingent fees owing to it upon the successful completion of the Business Combination, consisting of (a) an M&A fee of $20 million and (b) deferred underwriting fees of approximately $4.4 million. The LCAP Board did
not believe such fees would be such a conflict of interest that it should prevent Nomura from serving as financial advisor to the Company in evaluating and advising on the Business Combination.
|
•
|
MSP has entered into certain arrangements with VRM and its affiliates, which include preferred returns on cash distributions
and potential anti-dilution protections, which may impact existing and new investors. (See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” beginning on page [247]).
|
•
|
The Business Combination Proposal: The approval of the Business Combination Proposal
requires the affirmative vote (in person or by proxy) of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock entitled to vote and actually cast thereon at the Special Meeting, voting as a single
class. Accordingly, a stockholder’s failure to submit a proxy or to vote in person at the Special Meeting, as well as an abstention from voting and a broker non-vote with regard to the Business Combination Proposal, will have no effect
on the Business Combination Proposal. Company stockholders must approve the Business Combination Proposal in order for the Business Combination to occur.
|
•
|
The Nasdaq Proposal: The approval of the Nasdaq Proposal requires the affirmative
vote (in person or by proxy) of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock entitled to vote and actually cast thereon at the Special Meeting, voting as a single class. Accordingly, a
stockholder’s failure to submit a proxy or to vote in person at the Special Meeting, as well as an abstention from voting and a broker non-vote with regard to the Nasdaq Proposal, will have no effect on the Nasdaq Proposal. The Business
Combination is conditioned on the approval of the Nasdaq Proposal, subject to the terms of the MIPA. If the Business Combination Proposal is not approved, the Nasdaq Proposal will not be presented to the stockholders for a vote.
|
•
|
The Charter Approval Proposal: The approval of the Charter Approval Proposal
requires the affirmative vote (in person or by proxy) of (i) the holders of a majority of the Class A Common Stock then outstanding, voting separately as a single class, (ii) the holders of a majority of the Class B Common Stock then
outstanding, voting separately as a single class, and (iii) the holders of a majority of the shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock entitled to vote, voting as a single class. Accordingly, a stockholder’s failure to
submit a proxy or to vote in person at the Special Meeting, as well as an abstention from voting and a broker non-vote with regard to the Charter Approval Proposal, will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST”
such proposal. The Business Combination is conditioned on the approval of the Charter Approval Proposal, subject to the terms of the MIPA. If the Business Combination Proposal is not approved, the Charter Approval Proposal will not be
presented to the stockholders for a vote.
|
•
|
The Non-Binding Governance Proposals: The approval of the Non-Binding Governance
Proposals requires the affirmative vote (in person or by proxy) of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock entitled to vote and actually cast
thereon at the Special Meeting, voting as a single class. Accordingly, a stockholder’s failure to submit a proxy or to vote in person at the Special Meeting, as well as an abstention from voting and a broker non-vote with regard to the
Non-Binding Governance Proposals, will have no effect on the Non-Binding Governance Proposals. The Business Combination is not conditioned on the approval
of the Non-Binding Governance Proposals. If the Business Combination Proposal is not approved, the Non-Binding Governance Proposals will not be presented to
the stockholders for a vote.
|
•
|
The Director Election Proposal: The approval of the Director Election Proposal
requires the affirmative vote (in person or by proxy) of the holders of a plurality of the outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock entitled to vote and actually cast thereon at the Special Meeting, voting as
a single class. Stockholders may not cumulate their votes with respect to the election of directors. Accordingly, a stockholder’s failure to submit a proxy or to vote in person at the Special Meeting, as well as an abstention from
voting and a broker non-vote with regard to the Director Election Proposal, will have no effect on the election of directors. The Business Combination is conditioned on the approval of the Director Election Proposal, subject to the
terms of the MIPA. If the Business Combination Proposal is not approved, the Director Election Proposal will not be presented to the stockholders for a vote.
|
•
|
The Incentive Plan Proposal: The approval of the Incentive Plan Proposal requires
the affirmative vote (in person or by proxy) of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock entitled to vote and actually cast thereon at the Special Meeting, voting as a single class.
Accordingly, a stockholder’s failure to submit a proxy or to vote in person at the Special Meeting, as well
|
•
|
The Adjournment Proposal: The approval of the Adjournment Proposal, if presented,
requires the affirmative vote (in person or by proxy) of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock entitled to vote and actually cast thereon at the Special Meeting, voting as a single
class. Accordingly, a stockholder’s failure to submit a proxy or to vote in person at the Special Meeting, as well as an abstention from voting and a broker non-vote with regard to the Adjournment Proposal, will have no effect on the
Adjournment Proposal. The Business Combination is not conditioned on the approval of the Adjournment Proposal.
|
•
|
the fact that our Initial Stockholders have agreed not to redeem any of the Founder Shares in connection with a stockholder
vote to approve the proposed Business Combination;
|
•
|
the fact that Ophir Sternberg, Thomas W. Hawkins and Roger Meltzer will serve as directors of the Post-Combination Company;
|
•
|
the fact that the Sponsor paid an aggregate of $25,000 for 5,000,000 Founder Shares in January 2020 and, in February 2020,
the Company declared a stock dividend of 0.15 share for each Founder Share outstanding, resulting in the Sponsor holding an aggregate of 5,750,000 Founder Shares. After giving effect to the sales or transfer of Founder Shares to Nomura
and in connection with the IPO to certain insiders, the remaining 5,667,500 Founder Shares will have a significantly higher value at the time of the Business Combination, which if unrestricted and freely tradable would be valued at
approximately $56,675,000 but, given the restrictions on such shares, we believe such shares have less value;
|
•
|
the fact that our Initial Stockholders have agreed to waive their rights to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account
with respect to their Founder Shares if we fail to complete an initial business combination by August 18, 2022 (or such later date as may be approved by the Company’s stockholders);
|
•
|
the fact that our Initial Stockholders, being holders of Class A Common Stock, are eligible to receive the dividend comprised
of the New Warrants to be issued upon the automatic conversion of the Founder Shares at Closing, and the fact that, because our Initial Stockholders have agreed not to redeem their shares in connection with the Business Combination,
they may receive a significant number of such New Warrants, if other holders of Class A Common Stock elect to exercise their redemption rights;
|
•
|
the fact that the Sponsor paid an aggregate of $5,950,000 for Private Units comprised of 297,500 Private Warrants to purchase
shares of Class A Common Stock and that such Private Warrants will expire worthless if a business combination is not consummated by August 18, 2022;
|
•
|
the continued right of the Sponsor to hold Class A Common Stock and the shares of Class A Common Stock to be issued to the
Sponsor upon exercise of its Private Warrants following the Business Combination, subject to certain lock-up periods;
|
•
|
if the Trust Account is liquidated, including in the event we are unable to complete an initial business combination within
the required time period, the Sponsor has agreed to indemnify us to ensure that the proceeds in the Trust Account are not reduced below $10.00 per public share, or such lesser per public share amount as is in the Trust Account on the
liquidation date, by the claims of prospective target businesses
|
•
|
the Sponsor (including its representatives and affiliates) and the Company directors and officers, are, or may in the future
become, affiliated with entities that are engaged in a similar business to the Company. For example, each of the Company’s officers may be considered an affiliate of the Sponsor, and the directors and officers of the Company are also
affiliated with Lionheart III and Lionheart IV, all of which are blank check companies incorporated for the purpose of effecting their respective initial business combinations. In addition, Mr. Meltzer serves on the board of directors
of Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III, a blank check company incorporated for the purpose of effecting a business combination. The Sponsor and the Company’s directors and officers are not prohibited from sponsoring, or otherwise becoming
involved with, any other blank check companies prior to the Company completing its initial business combination. Moreover, certain of the Company’s directors and officers have time and attention requirements for certain other companies.
The Company’s directors and officers also may become aware of business opportunities which may be appropriate for presentation to the Company, and the other entities to which they owe certain fiduciary or contractual duties, including
Lionheart III and Lionheart IV. Accordingly, they may have had conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented. These conflicts may not be resolved in the Company’s favor and
such potential business opportunities may be presented to other entities prior to their presentation to the Company, subject to applicable fiduciary duties. The Existing Charter provides that the Company renounces its interest in any
corporate opportunity offered to any director or officer unless such opportunity is expressly offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of the Company and such opportunity is one the Company is
legally and contractually permitted to undertake and would otherwise be reasonable for the Company to pursue, and to the extent the director or officer is permitted to refer that opportunity to the Company without violating another
legal obligation. For more information, see “Management of the Company— Conflicts of Interests” ;
|
•
|
the continued indemnification of our existing directors and officers and the continuation of our directors’ and officers’
liability insurance after the Business Combination;
|
•
|
the fact that the Sponsor and our directors and officers will lose their entire investment in us and will not be reimbursed
for any out-of-pocket expenses if an initial business combination is not consummated by August 18, 2022; and
|
•
|
that, at the closing of the Business Combination, we will enter into the Registration Rights Agreement with the Sponsor and
our directors and officers which provides for registration rights to such persons and their permitted transferees.
|
•
|
there not being in force any law, judgment, injunction, decree or order of any court, arbitrator or other governmental
authority enjoining, restraining or prohibiting the consummation of the Closing;
|
•
|
the approval by the Company’s stockholders of the Business Combination Proposal, the Nasdaq Proposal, the Charter Approval
Proposal, the Director Election Proposal, and the Incentive Plan Proposal (collectively, the “Condition Precedent Proposals”);
|
•
|
the shares of Class A Common Stock to be issued (i) pursuant to the Business Combination, (ii) upon conversion of the Class B
Units of Opco that are included in the Up-C Units, or (iii) upon exercise of the New Warrants, in each case, being approved for listing on Nasdaq;
|
•
|
the Company having net tangible assets of at least $5,000,001 upon the consummation of the Business Combination, after giving
effect to any Company stockholder redemptions;
|
•
|
the expiration or termination of any applicable waiting period (including any extension thereof) under the HSR Act (which
waiting period expired on December 30, 2021);
|
•
|
the registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part having become effective in accordance with
the provisions of the Securities Act, no stop order having been issued by the SEC which remains in effect with respect to the registration statement, and no proceeding seeking such a stop order having been threatened or initiated by the
SEC which remains pending; and
|
•
|
the cash and cash equivalents of MSP and Opco (after giving effect to any redemptions and the payment of transaction costs,
including deferred underwriting fees), as of the Effective Time, plus all amounts in the Trust Account, not being less than $30.0 million (such condition, the “Minimum Cash Condition”), provided, however, that Messrs. Ruiz and Quesada
have agreed to loan (or cause to be loaned) to MSP up to the aggregate amount then-remaining in the Service Fee Account, and the Minimum Cash Condition will be deemed to be satisfied if that amount is so loaned, irrespective of the
amount of cash actually held by MSP and Opco.
|
•
|
each of MSP and the Members having performed in all material respects their respective obligations required to be performed
under the MIPA at or prior to the Closing Date;
|
•
|
the representations and warranties of MSP and the Members contained in the MIPA, disregarding all qualifications and
exceptions contained therein relating to materiality, being true, correct and complete at and as of the Closing Date, as if made at and as of such date (except to the extent expressly made as of an earlier date, in which case only as of
such date), except where the failure of such representations and warranties to be so true and correct, has not had, and would not have, a Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the MIPA);
|
•
|
MSP, the Members and the Members’ Representative, as applicable, having executed and delivered to the Company a copy of
certain ancillary agreements to which it is a party;
|
•
|
the Company having received a certificate signed by the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or other authorized
person of MSP stating that the conditions specified in Section 10.2(a) and Section 10.2(b) of the MIPA have been satisfied;
|
•
|
no Material Adverse Effect having occurred since the date of the MIPA; and
|
•
|
the Company having received the Tax Receivable Agreement duly executed by the Company, Opco and certain Members.
|
•
|
the Company and Opco having performed in all material respects their respective obligations under the MIPA required to be
performed at or prior to the Closing Date;
|
•
|
the representations and warranties of the Company and Opco contained in the MIPA, disregarding all qualifications and
exceptions contained therein relating to materiality, being true and correct at and as of the Closing Date, as if made at and as of such date (except to the extent expressly made as of an earlier date, in which case only as of such
date), except where the failure of such representations and warranties to be so true and correct, has not had, and would not have, a Parent Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the MIPA);
|
•
|
the Members’ Representative having received a certificate signed by an authorized officer of the Company stating that the
conditions specified in Section 10.3(a) and Section 10.3(b) of the MIPA have been satisfied;
|
•
|
the Company having delivered to the Members’ Representative (i) certified copies of the resolutions duly adopted by each of
the Company’s and Opco’s Boards of Directors authorizing the execution, delivery and performance of the MIPA; and (ii) written resignations, in forms satisfactory to the Members’ Representative, dated as of the Closing Date and
effective as of the Closing, executed by (A) all officers of the Company and Opco; and (B) all persons serving as directors of the Company and Opco immediately prior to the Closing who are not selected as directors in accordance with
Section 9.8 of the MIPA;
|
•
|
the Company and Opco having executed and delivered to the Members’ Representative a copy of certain ancillary agreements to
which each is a party;
|
•
|
no Parent Material Adverse Effect having occurred since the date of the MIPA;
|
•
|
the Board having been appointed as the board of directors of the Post-Combination Company;
|
•
|
each of the covenants of the Sponsor required under the Sponsor Agreement to be performed as of or prior to the Closing
having been performed in all material respects, and none of the Sponsors having threatened (orally or in writing) (i) that the Sponsor Agreement is not valid, binding and in full force and effect, (ii) that the Company is in breach of
or default under the Sponsor Agreement or (iii) to terminate the Sponsor Agreement; and
|
•
|
Opco having delivered the Tax Receivable Agreement, duly executed by the Company, Opco and certain Members.
|
|
| |
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
| |
2021
|
| |
2020
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
| |
|
| |
(as restated)
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Loss from operations
|
| |
$(3,785)
|
| |
$(1,472)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
| |
$6,992
|
| |
$(590)
|
Income (loss) before (provision for) benefit from income taxes
|
| |
$3,207
|
| |
$(2,062)
|
Net Income (loss)
|
| |
$3,207
|
| |
$(2,062)
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding,
Class A Common Stock
|
| |
23,650,000
|
| |
8,674,180
|
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share, Class A Common Stock
|
| |
$0.11
|
| |
$(0.15)
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding,
Class B Common Stock
|
| |
5,750,000
|
| |
5,127,732
|
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share, Class B Common Stock
|
| |
$0.11
|
| |
$(0.15)
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Statement of Cash Flows Data
|
| |
|
| |
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
| |
$(848)
|
| |
$(434)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
| |
$13
|
| |
$(230,000)
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
| |
$(5)
|
| |
$231,452
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
| |
As of December 31,
|
|||
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
| |
2021
|
| |
2020
|
|
| |
|
| |
(as restated)
|
Total assets
|
| |
$230,199
|
| |
$231,153
|
Total liabilities
|
| |
$18,424
|
| |
$22,584
|
Class A common stock subject to possible redemption
|
| |
$230,000
|
| |
$230,000
|
Total deficit
|
| |
$(18,225)
|
| |
$(21,431)
|
|
| |
Year Ended December 31,
|
|||
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
| |
2021
|
| |
2020
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Total Claims Recovery
|
| |
$14,626
|
| |
$13,887
|
Total operating expenses
|
| |
$21,796
|
| |
$17,216
|
Operating loss
|
| |
$(7,170)
|
| |
$(3,329)
|
Net loss
|
| |
$(33,077)
|
| |
$(24,266)
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling members
|
| |
$(16)
|
| |
$18
|
Net loss attributable to Stockholders
|
| |
$(33,093)
|
| |
$(24,248)
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Statement of Cash Flows Data
|
| |
|
| |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
| |
$2,249
|
| |
$(14)
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
| |
$(2,007)
|
| |
$986
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
| |
$(10,457)
|
| |
$9,610
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
| |
As of December 31,
|
|||
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
| |
2021
|
| |
2020
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Total assets
|
| |
$104,006
|
| |
$17,843
|
Total liabilities
|
| |
$255,414
|
| |
$133,690
|
Total Stockholders' Equity Attributable to Stockholders
|
| |
$(155,756)
|
| |
$(120,179)
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
| |
$4,348
|
| |
$4,332
|
Total deficit
|
| |
$(151,408)
|
| |
$(115,847)
|
•
|
No Redemption Scenario: this scenario assumes that no additional shares of Class A
Common Stock are redeemed, after giving effect to the redemption of 10,946,369 shares of Class A Common Stock in connection with the Company stockholder vote to approve the Extension Amendment.
|
•
|
Expense Adjusted Maximum Redemption Scenario: this scenario assumes that 5,401,587
shares of Class A Common Stock are redeemed for an aggregate payment of approximately $54.0 million (based on the estimated per share redemption price of approximately $10.00 per share) from the Trust Account. The remaining shares not
redeemed include 650,000 shares of Class A Common Stock that are not subject to redemption as the shareholders have waived redemption rights. Cash available for the expense adjusted maximum redemption scenario is calculated as the cash
in trust less remaining transaction costs to be paid in cash reflected in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet.
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Statement of Operations Data
|
| |
Year Ended
December 31, 2021
|
|||
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
| |
No
Redemption
|
| |
Expense Adjusted
Maximum Redemption
|
Total Claims Recovery
|
| |
$14,626
|
| |
$14,626
|
Total operating expenses
|
| |
$25,886
|
| |
$25,886
|
Operating Income loss
|
| |
$(11,260)
|
| |
$(11,260)
|
Loss before provision for income taxes
|
| |
$(30,190)
|
| |
$(31,314)
|
Net loss
|
| |
$(30,123)
|
| |
$(31,011)
|
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling members
|
| |
$(26,324)
|
| |
$(27,483)
|
Net loss attributable to Stockholders
|
| |
$(3,799)
|
| |
$(3,528)
|
Basic and diluted pro forma weighted average shares
outstanding, Class A Common stock
|
| |
30,278,631
|
| |
24,877,044
|
Basic and diluted pro forma net loss per share, Class A Common stock
|
| |
$(0.13)
|
| |
$(0.14)
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet Data
|
| |
As of
December 31, 2021
|
|||
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
| |
No Redemption
|
| |
Expense Adjusted
Maximum Redemptions
|
Total assets
|
| |
$6,169,403
|
| |
$6,143,484
|
Total liabilities
|
| |
$251,020
|
| |
$281,692
|
Total Stockholders' Equity Attributable to Stockholders
|
| |
$61,202
|
| |
$52,914
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
| |
$5,857,181
|
| |
$5,809,598
|
Total equity
|
| |
$5,918,383
|
| |
$5,861,792
|
•
|
the benefits of the Business Combination;
|
•
|
the inability of the parties to successfully or timely consummate the Business Combination;
|
•
|
the risk that any required regulatory approvals are not obtained, are delayed or are subject to unanticipated conditions that
could adversely affect the Post-Combination Company or the expected benefits of the Business Combination;
|
•
|
the future financial performance of the Post-Combination Company following the Business Combination;
|
•
|
the risk that any of the conditions to Closing are not satisfied in the anticipated manner or on the anticipated timeline;
|
•
|
changes in the market for MSP’s services;
|
•
|
MSP’s and/or the Company’s ability to successfully defend litigation;
|
•
|
expansion plans and opportunities;
|
•
|
MSP’s ability to implement its corporate strategy and the impact of such strategy on its future operations and financial and
operational results;
|
•
|
MSP’s strategic advantages and the impact that those advantages will have on future financial and operational results;
|
•
|
changes in business, market, financial, political and legal conditions;
|
•
|
the impact of various interest rate environments on MSP’s future financial results of operations;
|
•
|
MSP’s evaluation of competition in its markets and its relative position;
|
•
|
MSP’s ability to successfully recover proceeds related to the Claims it owns or services;
|
•
|
MSP’s accounting policies;
|
•
|
upgrading and maintain information technology systems;
|
•
|
macroeconomic conditions that may affect MSP’s business and the healthcare data and health claims recovery industry in general;
|
•
|
political and geopolitical conditions that may affect MSP’s business and the healthcare data and health claims recovery
industry in general;
|
•
|
the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, or any other similar pandemic or public health situation, on MSP’s business and the
healthcare data and health claims recovery industry in general; and
|
•
|
risks relating to the uncertainty of the projected financial information with respect to MSP and the Company.
|
•
|
the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could delay the Business Combination or give rise to the
termination of the MIPA;
|
•
|
risks related to disruption of management’s time from ongoing business operations due to the proposed transactions;
|
•
|
litigation, complaints and/or adverse publicity;
|
•
|
changes in applicable laws or regulations;
|
•
|
the ability to recognize the anticipated benefits of the Business Combination, which may be affected by, among other things,
competition, rulings in the legal proceedings to which MSP is a party and retaining its management and key employees;
|
•
|
the inability to meet applicable Nasdaq listing standards;
|
•
|
privacy and data protection laws, privacy or data breaches, or the loss of data;
|
•
|
costs related to the Business Combination;
|
•
|
the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted against MSP or the Company following announcement of the proposed
Business Combination;
|
•
|
the possibility that the business of MSP may be adversely affected by other economic, business, and/or competitive factors; and
|
•
|
other risks and uncertainties indicated in this proxy statement/prospectus, including those set forth under the section
entitled “Risk Factors”.
|
•
|
MSP has a history of net losses and no substantial revenue to date, and it may not generate recoveries, create significant
revenue or achieve profitability. Its relatively limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate current business and future prospects and increases the risk of your investment.
|
•
|
MSP has a limited history of actual recoveries to date as a result of cases that are still in litigation, and there are risks
associated with estimating the amount of revenue that MSP will recognize from potential recoveries. If MSP’s projections are not realized, it would impact the timing and the amount of MSP’s revenue recognition and have a material adverse
effect on its business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
|
•
|
Under some agreements with Assignors, MSP assumes the risk of failure to recover on the assigned claims, and if it fails to
make recoveries with respect to the assigned claims and therefore is unable to generate recovery proceeds greater than or equal to the expenses it incurred in the limited times where it paid to purchase the assigned claims, such losses
can adversely affect MSP’s business.
|
•
|
A significant portion of MSP’s recovery collections relies upon its success in individual, class action or mass aggregated
claims in lawsuits brought against third parties, which are inherently unpredictable, as is MSP’s ability to collect on judgments in its favor.
|
•
|
MSP’s recoveries are dependent upon the court system, and unfavorable court rulings or delays can adversely affect its recovery
efforts and business.
|
•
|
MSP’s recoveries are materially reduced by its fee sharing arrangement with the Law Firm.
|
•
|
Litigation outcomes are inherently risky and difficult to predict, and an adverse outcome may result in complete loss of MSP’s
claims associated with that matter (or a complete loss in value associated with those claims).
|
•
|
Despite MSP’s success as it relates to its assignments in published appellate decisions, MSP’s assignments can be deemed
invalid in court, which could adversely affect its recoveries and its business.
|
•
|
Courts may find some of MSP’s damages calculations to include claim lines that are unreasonable, unrelated, or unnecessary.
|
•
|
The Post-Combination Company’s only significant asset will be its ownership interest in Opco. Such ownership may not be
sufficient to pay dividends or make distributions or loans to enable it to pay any dividends on common stock or satisfy other financial obligations.
|
•
|
The Initial Stockholders have agreed to vote in favor of the Business Combination described in this proxy statement/prospectus,
regardless of how Public Stockholders vote.
|
•
|
A market for the Company’s securities may not continue, which would adversely affect the liquidity and price of our securities.
|
•
|
If the Business Combination’s benefits do not meet the expectations of investors, stockholders or financial analysts, the
market price of the Company’s securities may decline.
|
•
|
If third parties bring claims against the Company, the proceeds held in the Trust Account could be reduced and the per share
redemption amount received by stockholders may be less than $10.00 per share.
|
•
|
The Company’s independent directors may decide not to enforce the indemnification obligations of the Sponsor, resulting in a
reduction in the amount of funds in the Trust Account available for distribution to Public Stockholders.
|
•
|
Our assessment that the assigned claims are potentially recoverable claims;
|
•
|
The achievement of multiples above the paid amount of potentially recoverable claims; and
|
•
|
The length (and cost) of litigation required to achieve recoveries.
|
•
|
Dismissal for failure to file within the applicable statute of limitations.
|
•
|
Dismissal because an assignment did not include the claim that was brought in court (or such assignment was found to be
invalid).
|
•
|
Dismissal for lack of standing to assert claims.
|
•
|
Dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction.
|
•
|
Dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
|
•
|
Dismissal for pleading deficiencies.
|
•
|
simplification of the U.S. healthcare delivery and reimbursement systems, either through shifts in the commercial healthcare
marketplace or through legislative or regulatory changes at the federal or state level;
|
•
|
reductions in the scope of private sector or government healthcare benefits (for example, decisions to eliminate coverage of
certain services);
|
•
|
the transition of healthcare beneficiaries from fee-for-service plans to value-based plans;
|
•
|
the adoption of healthcare plans with significantly higher deductibles;
|
•
|
limits placed on payment integrity initiatives, including the Medicare RAC program; and
|
•
|
lower than projected growth in private health insurance or the various Medicare and Medicaid programs, including Medicare
Advantage.
|
•
|
the price, performance and functionality of our solutions;
|
•
|
the availability, price, performance and functionality of competing solutions;
|
•
|
our Assignors’ perceived ability to review claims accurately using their internal resources;
|
•
|
our ability to develop complementary solutions;
|
•
|
our continued ability to access the data necessary to enable us to effectively develop and deliver new solutions to Assignors;
|
•
|
the stability and security of our platform;
|
•
|
changes in healthcare laws, regulations or trends; and
|
•
|
the business environment of our Assignors.
|
•
|
power loss, transmission cable cuts and telecommunications failures;
|
•
|
damage or interruption caused by fire, earthquake and other natural disasters;
|
•
|
attacks by hackers or nefarious actors;
|
•
|
human error;
|
•
|
computer viruses and other malware, or software defects; and
|
•
|
physical break-ins, sabotage, intentional acts of vandalism, terrorist attacks and other events beyond our control.
|
•
|
amendment, enactment, or interpretation of laws and regulations that restrict the access and use of personal information and
reduce the supply of data available to Assignors;
|
•
|
changes in cultural and consumer attitudes to favor further restrictions on information collection and sharing, which may lead
to regulations that prevent full utilization of our solutions;
|
•
|
failure of our solutions to comply with current laws and regulations; and
|
•
|
failure of our solutions to adapt to changes in the regulatory environment in an efficient, cost-effective manner.
|
•
|
other payment accuracy vendors, including vendors focused on discrete aspects of the healthcare payment accuracy process;
|
•
|
fraud, waste and abuse claim edit and predictive analysis companies;
|
•
|
primary claims processors;
|
•
|
numerous regional utilization management companies;
|
•
|
in-house payment accuracy capabilities;
|
•
|
Medicare RACs; and
|
•
|
healthcare consulting firms and other third-party liability service providers.
|
•
|
our ability to integrate operational, accounting and technology policies, processes and systems and the implementation of those
policies and procedures;
|
•
|
our ability to integrate personnel and human resources systems as well as the cultures of each of the acquired businesses;
|
•
|
our ability to implement our business plan for the acquired business;
|
•
|
transition of operations, users and Assignors to our existing platforms or the integration of data, systems and technology
platforms with ours;
|
•
|
compliance with regulatory requirements and avoiding potential conflicts of interest in markets that we serve;
|
•
|
diversion of management’s attention and other resources;
|
•
|
our ability to retain or replace key personnel;
|
•
|
our ability to maintain relationships with the clients of the acquired business or a strategic partner and further develop the
acquired business or the business of our strategic partner;
|
•
|
our ability to cross-sell our solutions of the acquired businesses or strategic partners to our respective Assignors;
|
•
|
entry into unfamiliar markets;
|
•
|
assumption of unanticipated legal or financial liabilities and/or negative publicity related to prior acts by the acquired
entity;
|
•
|
litigation or other claims in connection with the acquired company, including claims from terminated employees, Assignors,
former stockholders or third parties;
|
•
|
misuse of intellectual property by our strategic partners;
|
•
|
disagreements with strategic partners or a misalignment of incentives within any strategic partnership;
|
•
|
becoming significantly leveraged as a result of incurring debt to finance an acquisition;
|
•
|
unanticipated operating, accounting or management difficulties in connection with the acquired entities; and
|
•
|
impairment of acquired intangible assets, including goodwill, and dilution to our earnings per share.
|
•
|
underperformance relative to our expectations and the price paid for the claims;
|
•
|
unanticipated demands on our management and operational resources;
|
•
|
failure to successfully recover on legal claims;
|
•
|
difficulty in integrating personnel, operations, and systems;
|
•
|
maintaining current customers and securing future customers of the combined businesses;
|
•
|
assumption of liabilities; and
|
•
|
litigation-related charges.
|
•
|
the fact that our Initial Stockholders have agreed not to redeem any of the Founder Shares in connection with a stockholder
vote to approve the proposed Business Combination;
|
•
|
the fact that Ophir Sternberg, Thomas W. Hawkins and Roger Meltzer will serve as directors of the Post-Combination Company;
|
•
|
the fact that the Sponsor paid an aggregate of $25,000 for 5,000,000 Founder Shares in January 2020 and, in February 2020, the
Company declared a stock dividend of 0.15 share for each Founder Share outstanding, resulting in the Sponsor holding an aggregate of 5,750,000 Founder Shares. After giving effect to the sales or transfer of Founder Shares to Nomura and in
connection with the IPO to certain insiders, the remaining 5,667,500 Founder Shares will have a significantly higher value at the time of the Business Combination, which if unrestricted and freely tradable would be valued at approximately
$56,675,000 but, given the restrictions on such shares, we believe such shares have less value. In addition, given the differential in the purchase price that our Sponsor paid for the Founder Shares as compared to the price of the units
sold in the IPO and the substantial number of shares of Class A Common Stock that our Sponsor will receive upon conversion of the Founder Shares in connection with the Business Combination, our
|
•
|
the fact that Nomura has contingent fees owing to it upon the successful completion of the Business Combination, consisting of
(a) an M&A fee of $20 million and (b) deferred underwriting fees of approximately $4.4 million;
|
•
|
the fact that our Initial Stockholders have agreed to waive their rights to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account
with respect to their Founder Shares if we fail to complete an initial business combination by August 18, 2022 (or such later date as may be approved by the Company’s stockholders);
|
•
|
the fact that our Initial Stockholders, being holders of Class A Common Stock, are eligible to receive the dividend comprised
of the New Warrants to be issued upon the automatic conversion of the Founder Shares at Closing, and the fact that, because our Initial Stockholders have agreed not to redeem their shares in connection with the Business Combination, they
may receive a significant number of such New Warrants, if other holders of Class A Common Stock elect to exercise their redemption rights;
|
•
|
the fact that the Sponsor paid an aggregate of $5,950,000 for Private Units comprised of 297,500 Private Warrants to purchase
shares of Class A Common Stock and that such Private Warrants will expire worthless if a business combination is not consummated by August 18, 2022;
|
•
|
the continued right of the Sponsor to hold Class A Common Stock and the shares of Class A Common Stock to be issued to the
Sponsor upon exercise of its Private Warrants following the Business Combination, subject to certain lock-up periods;
|
•
|
if the Trust Account is liquidated, including in the event we are unable to complete an initial business combination within the
required time period, the Sponsor has agreed to indemnify us to ensure that the proceeds in the Trust Account are not reduced below $10.00 per public share, or such lesser per public share amount as is in the Trust Account on the
liquidation date, by the claims of prospective target businesses with which we have entered into an acquisition agreement or claims of any third party (other than our independent public accountants) for services rendered or products sold
to us, but only if such a vendor or target business has not executed a waiver of any and all rights to seek access to the Trust Account;
|
•
|
the Sponsor (including its representatives and affiliates) and the Company directors and officers, are, or may in the future
become, affiliated with entities that are engaged in a similar business to the Company. For example, each of the Company’s officers may be considered an affiliate of the Sponsor, and the directors and officers of the Company are also
affiliated with Lionheart III and Lionheart IV, all of which are blank check companies incorporated for the purpose of effecting their respective initial business combinations. In addition, Mr. Meltzer serves on the board of directors of
Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III, a blank check company incorporated for the purpose of effecting a business combination. The Sponsor and the Company’s directors and officers are not prohibited from sponsoring, or otherwise becoming
involved with, any other blank check companies prior to the Company completing its initial business combination. Moreover, certain of the Company’s directors and officers have time and attention requirements for certain other companies.
The Company’s directors and officers also may become aware of business opportunities which may be appropriate for presentation to the Company, and the other entities to which they owe certain fiduciary or contractual duties, including
Lionheart III and Lionheart IV. Accordingly, they may have had conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented. These conflicts may not be resolved in the Company’s favor and such
potential business opportunities may be presented to other entities prior to their presentation to the Company, subject to applicable fiduciary duties. The Existing Charter provides that the Company renounces its interest in any corporate
opportunity offered to any director or officer unless such opportunity is expressly offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of the Company and such opportunity is one the Company is legally and
contractually permitted to undertake and would otherwise be reasonable for the Company to pursue, and to the extent the director or officer is permitted to refer that opportunity to the Company without violating another legal obligation.
For more information, see “Management of the Company— Conflicts of Interests.”
|
•
|
the continued indemnification of our existing directors and officers and the continuation of our directors’ and officers’
liability insurance after the Business Combination;
|
•
|
the fact that the Sponsor and our directors and officers will lose their entire investment in us and will not be reimbursed for
any out-of-pocket expenses if an initial business combination is not consummated by August 18, 2022; and
|
•
|
that, at the closing of the Business Combination we will enter into the Registration Rights Agreement with the Sponsor and our
directors and officers which provides for registration rights to such persons and their permitted transferees.
|
•
|
a limited availability of market quotations for our securities;
|
•
|
reduced liquidity for our securities;
|
•
|
a determination that the Class A Common Stock is a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in the Class Common A Stock
to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our securities;
|
•
|
a limited amount of news and analyst coverage; and
|
•
|
a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.
|
•
|
the Company may experience negative reactions from the financial markets, including negative impacts on its stock price
(including to the extent that the current market price reflects a market assumption that the Business Combination will be completed);
|
•
|
MSP may experience negative reactions from its Assignors (clients) and employees;
|
•
|
MSP and the Company will have incurred substantial expenses and will be required to pay certain costs relating to the Business
Combination, whether or not the Business Combination is completed; and
|
•
|
since the MIPA restricts the conduct of MSP’s and the Company’s businesses prior to completion of the Business Combination,
each of MSP and the Company may not have been able to take certain actions during the pendency of the Business Combination that would have benefitted it as an independent company, and the opportunity to take such actions may no longer be
available (see the section entitled “The Membership Interest Purchase Agreement — Covenants and Agreements” beginning on page [215] of this proxy statement/prospectus for a
description of the restrictive covenants applicable to MSP and the Company).
|
•
|
changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities;
|
•
|
expected timing and amount of the release of any tax valuation allowances;
|
•
|
tax effects of stock-based compensation;
|
•
|
changes in tax laws, regulations or interpretations thereof; or
|
•
|
lower than anticipated future earnings in jurisdictions where we have lower statutory tax rates and higher than anticipated
future earnings in jurisdictions where we have higher statutory tax rates.
|
•
|
no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect candidates to
serve as a director of the Board;
|
•
|
a classified board of directors with three-year staggered terms, which could delay the ability of stockholders to change the
membership of a majority of the Board;
|
•
|
the requirement that, at any time from and after the date on which the voting power of John H. Ruiz and his affiliates
represent less than 50% of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares entitled to vote (“Voting Rights Threshold Date”), directors elected by the stockholders generally entitled to vote may be removed from the Board solely for
cause and only by affirmative vote of the holders of at least 662∕3% of the voting power of the then outstanding shares entitled to vote, voting together as a single class;
|
•
|
the exclusive right of the Board to fill newly created directorships and vacancies with respect to directors elected by the
stockholders generally entitled to vote, which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on the Board;
|
•
|
the prohibition on stockholder action by written consent from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date, which forces
stockholder action from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date to be taken at an annual or special meeting of stockholders;
|
•
|
the requirement that special meetings of stockholders may only be called by the Chairperson of the Board, the Chief Executive
Officer of the Post-Combination Company or the Board, which may delay the ability of our stockholders to force consideration of a proposal or to take action, including the removal of directors;
|
•
|
the requirement that, from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date, amendments to certain provisions of the Proposed Charter
and amendments to the Amended and Restated Bylaws must be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 662∕3% in voting power of the then outstanding shares of the
Post-Combination Company generally entitled to vote;
|
•
|
our authorized but unissued shares of common stock and preferred stock are available for future issuances without stockholder
approval and could be utilized for a variety of corporate purposes, including future offerings to raise additional capital, acquisitions and employee benefit plans; the existence of authorized but unissued and unreserved shares of common
stock and preferred stock could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise;
|
•
|
advance notice procedures set forth in the Amended and Restated Bylaws that stockholders must comply with in order to nominate
candidates to the Board or to propose other matters to be acted upon at a meeting of stockholders, which may discourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer’s own slate of directors
or otherwise attempting to obtain control of the Post-Combination Company; and
|
•
|
an exclusive forum provision which provides that, unless the Post-Combination Company consents in writing to the selection of
an alternative forum, (i) any derivative action brought on behalf of the Post-Combination Company, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer, or employee of the Post-Combination Company
to the Post-Combination Company or the Post-Combination Company’s stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, the Proposed Charter or the Amended and Restated Bylaws, or (iv) any action
asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine of the State of Delaware, in each case, will be required to be filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware
lacks jurisdiction over any such action or proceeding, then a state court located within the State of Delaware or the federal district court for the District of Delaware).
|
•
|
MSP did not have sufficient accounting and financial reporting resources to address MSP’s financial reporting requirements.
Specifically:
|
○
|
MSP did not have sufficient resources with an appropriate level of knowledge and U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles expertise to identify, evaluate and account for transactions;
|
○
|
MSP did not have an adequate segregation of duties or appropriate level of review that is needed
to comply with financial reporting requirements.
|
•
|
MSP did not design, implement or maintain an effective control environment over our financial reporting requirements.
Specifically:
|
○
|
MSP did not have effective controls over the period end financial reporting process and
preparation of financial statements due to:
|
○
|
MSP did not have appropriate controls or documented segregation of duties over information
technology systems used to create or maintain financial reporting records;
|
○
|
MSP did not design or maintain the appropriate controls related to the separation of accounting
records for each entity included within the combined and consolidated financial statements of MSP.
|
a)
|
Claims Recovery. MSP Recovery acquires payment claims from its
Assignors, and leverages its data analytics capability to identify payments that were improperly paid by secondary payers, and seek to recover the full amounts owed to its Assignors against those parties who under applicable law or
contract were primarily responsible. In addition, MSP Recovery derives revenues from contracts with customers for claims recovery services arrangements (“claims recovery services”). Claims recovery services include services to related
parties or third parties to assist those entities with pursuit of claims recovery rights; and
|
b)
|
Chase to Pay Services. “Chase to pay” service (“Chase to Pay”),
through which MSP Recovery uses its data analytics to assist its healthcare provider clients to identify in the first instance the proper primary insurer at the point of care and thereby avoid making a wrongful payment. MSP Recovery has
yet to generate revenue from Chase to Pay, nor have they executed any agreements with customers for Chase to Pay services. MSP Recovery is currently in the process of determining the pricing and form of these arrangements.
|
•
|
the reverse recapitalization between LCAP and MSP Recovery, whereby the Post-Combination Company will be organized in an Up-C
structure;
|
•
|
the redemption of 10,946,369 shares of Class A Common Stock for $109.5 million in connection with the Company stockholder vote
to approve the Extension Amendment;
|
•
|
MSP Recovery’s planned purchase of assets from VRM MSP discussed in Note 3 and the payment, in connection with the Virage
Exclusivity Termination, of $200 million in Up-C Units, valued at $10 per Up-C Unit, from the aggregate consideration being paid to the Members (or their designees) pursuant to the MIPA at Closing;
|
•
|
MSP Recovery’s planned Series MRCS asset acquisitions discussed in Note 3;
|
•
|
the issuance of New Warrants; and
|
•
|
the exercise of the existing LCAP Public and Private Warrants.
|
•
|
No Redemption Scenario: this scenario assumes that no additional shares of Class A
Common Stock are redeemed, after giving effect to the redemption of 10,946,369 shares of Class A Common Stock in connection with the Company stockholder vote to approve the Extension Amendment.
|
•
|
Expense Adjusted Maximum Redemption Scenario: this scenario assumes that 5,401,587
shares of Class A Common Stock are redeemed for an aggregate payment of approximately $54.0 million (based on the estimated per share redemption price of approximately $10.00 per share) from the Trust Account. The remaining shares not
redeemed include 650,000 shares of Class A Common Stock that are not subject to redemption as the shareholders have waived redemption rights. Cash available for the expense adjusted maximum redemption scenario is calculated as the cash in
trust less remaining transaction costs to be paid in cash reflected in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet.
|
|
| |
No Redemption
Scenario
|
| |
Expense Adjusted
Maximum Redemption
Scenario
|
||||||
|
| |
Shares
|
| |
%
|
| |
Shares
|
| |
%
|
Class A - LCAP Public Stockholders and holders of Private
Shares(1)(6)(8)
|
| |
12,703,631
|
| |
0.4%
|
| |
7,302,044
|
| |
0.2%
|
Class A - LCAP Initial Stockholders(1)(2)
|
| |
5,750,000
|
| |
0.2%
|
| |
5,750,000
|
| |
0.2%
|
Class A - LCAP Private and Public Warrantholders(1)(5)
|
| |
11,825,000
|
| |
0.4%
|
| |
11,825,000
|
| |
0.4%
|
Total LCAP
|
| |
30,278,631
|
| |
0.9%
|
| |
24,877,044
|
| |
0.8%
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Class V - MSP Recovery Members(3)(9)
|
| |
2,628,037,909
|
| |
80.1%
|
| |
2,628,037,909
|
| |
80.2%
|
Class V - Virage; VRM(4)(9)
|
| |
140,000,000
|
| |
4.3%
|
| |
140,000,000
|
| |
4.3%
|
Class V - Other(3)(4)
|
| |
65,662,091
|
| |
2.0%
|
| |
65,662,091
|
| |
2.0%
|
Class V - MRCS(4)
|
| |
416,300,000
|
| |
12.8%
|
| |
416,300,000
|
| |
12.7%
|
Total MSP
|
| |
3,250,000,000
|
| |
99.1%
|
| |
3,250,000,000
|
| |
99.2%
|
|
| | | | | | | | ||||
Total Shares at Closing(6)(7)
|
| |
3,280,278,631
|
| |
100.0%
|
| |
3,274,877,044
|
| |
100.0%
|
(1)
|
Class A Common Stock are economic shares and entitled to one vote per share.
|
(2)
|
If the LCAP transaction costs exceed $60.0 million, the Initial Stockholders will forfeit LCAP Class B Common Stock (share class
prior to the conversion to Class A Common Stock at Close) or pay cash to settle the excess costs in accordance with the MIPA. Based on the current estimated transaction costs, no such forfeiture or cash pay down is required and no
adjustment has been reflected in the pro formas.
|
(3)
|
Total enterprise value including the MRCS and VRM MSP assets purchases is $32.5 billion or 3.25 billion Up-C Units. The
3.25 billion Up-C Units include 3.25 billion non-economic, Class V Common Stock and 3.25 billion non-voting economic Class B Units of the Opco. Of that amount, $26.5 billion or 2.6 billion Up-C Units which includes 2.6 billion Class V
Common Stock will be issued to MSP Recovery Members (this includes 6.0 million Class V Common Stock issued as part of the Escrow Units included in total consideration and
|
(4)
|
Assumes 120,000,000 Up-C Units are issued to VRM as Upfront Consideration and includes an additional 20,000,000 Up-C Units to be
paid in connection with the Virage Exclusivity Termination from the aggregate consideration being paid to the Members (or their designees) pursuant to the MIPA at Closing. The 120,000,000 Up-C Units to be issued as Upfront Consideration
represent part of the consideration for the $4.0 billion of assets acquired from VRM MSP and $2.0 billion of assets from the MRCS asset acquisitions, and will be paid to VRM. Refer to Note 3 of the unaudited condensed combined pro forma
section of this proxy statement/prospectus. The consideration paid to VRM MSP can be in the form of Up-C Units, LCAP Class A Common Stock, cash, or a combination thereof. The unaudited pro formas assume that the equity portion of the
consideration will be paid in the form of Up-C Units at the Closing and as such, these investors would receive Class V Common Stock and Class B Units. The total $6.0 billion is deducted from the $32.5 billion above in footnote 3 to this
table.
|
(5)
|
Shares include the 11,825,000 Class A Common Stock underlying LCAP’s Public and Private Warrants as they are expected to be in
the money as of Closing when the exercise price could be reduced from $11.50 per warrant to $0.0001 after giving effect to the issuance of the New Warrants. As such, it is assumed that the exercise price falls to less than $11.50 and 100%
of the warrants are redeemed for LCAP Class A Common Stock.
|
(6)
|
Shares exclude 1,029,000,000 Class A Common Stock underlying approximately 1,029,000,000 New Warrants to be issued, conditioned
upon the consummation of any redemptions by the holders of Class A Common Stock and the Closing, to the holders of record of the Class A Common Stock on the Closing Date, after giving effect to the waiver of the right, title and interest
in, to or under, participation in any such dividend by the Members, on behalf of themselves and any of their designees. The number of New Warrants to be distributed in respect of each share of unredeemed Class A Common Stock is contingent
upon, and will vary with, the aggregate number of shares of Class A Common Stock that are redeemed in connection with the Business Combination. Pursuant to the terms of the LLC Agreement, at least twice a month, to the extent any New
Warrants have been exercised in accordance with their terms, the Company following the Business Combination is required to purchase from the MSP Principals, proportionately, the number of Up-C Units or shares of Class A Common Stock owned
by such MSP Principal equal to the aggregate amount of the exercise price received in connection with exercise of the New Warrants during an applicable period (the “Aggregate Exercise Price”) divided by the Warrant Exercise Price (as
defined in the LLC Agreement) in exchange for the Aggregate Exercise Price. The figures shown in the table will be affected by the level of redemptions by Public Stockholders and the exercise of outstanding warrants or New Warrants. See ”Summary—Ownership of the Post-Combination Company.”
|
(7)
|
Shares excludes up to $100.0 million of LCAP Class A common stock that may be issued to Nomura under the Forward Purchase
Agreement. Refer to Note 1 of the unaudited condensed combined pro forma section of this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
(8)
|
Shares reflect the redemption of 10,946,369 shares of Class A Common Stock for $109.5 million in connection with the Company
stockholder vote to approve the Extension Amendment.
|
(9)
|
MSP Recovery Member Shares reflect the payment, in connection with the Virage Exclusivity Termination, of $200 million in Up-C
Units, valued at $10 per Up-C Unit, from the aggregate consideration being paid to the Members (or their designees) pursuant to the MIPA at Closing.
|
|
| |
As of December 31, 2021
|
| |
|
| |
As of December 31, 2021
|
| |
|
| |
As of December 31, 2021
|
|||||||||
|
| |
LCAP
(Historical)
(US GAAP)
|
| |
MSP Recovery
(As Adjusted)
(Note 3)
|
| |
Transaction
Accounting
Adjustments
(No Redemption
Scenario)
|
| |
Pro Forma
Combined
(No Redemption
Scenario)
|
| |
Transaction
Accounting
Adjustments
(Expense
Adjusted
Maximum
Redemption
Scenario)
|
| |
Pro Forma
Combined
(Expense
Adjusted
Maximum
Redemption
Scenario)
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Current assets
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Cash
|
| |
177
|
| |
—
|
| |
(177)
|
| |
(a)
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
—
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
| |
—
|
| |
1,664
|
| |
177
|
| |
(a)
|
| |
55,683
|
| |
(54,019)
|
| |
(j)
|
| |
29,764
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
120,543
|
| |
(b)
|
| |
|
| |
28,100
|
| |
(k)
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(66,701)
|
| |
(e)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Affiliate receivable
|
| |
—
|
| |
4,070
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
4,070
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
4,070
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
| |
9
|
| |
13,304
|
| |
(8,252)
|
| |
(e)
|
| |
5,061
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
5,061
|
Total Current Assets
|
| |
186
|
| |
19,038
|
| |
45,590
|
| |
|
| |
64,814
|
| |
(25,919)
|
| |
|
| |
38,895
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
| |
—
|
| |
750
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
750
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
750
|
Intangible assets, net
|
| |
—
|
| |
84,218
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
84,218
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
84,218
|
Investments
|
| |
—
|
| |
4,006,621
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
4,006,621
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
4,006,621
|
Other assets - Excluded Series and MSP Recovery Claim Series 01
|
| |
—
|
| |
2,013,000
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2,013,000
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2,013,000
|
Marketable securities held in Trust Account
|
| |
230,013
|
| |
—
|
| |
(109,470)
|
| |
(b)
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
—
|
|
| | | | | |
(120,543)
|
| |
(b)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
||
TOTAL ASSETS
|
| |
230,199
|
| |
6,123,627
|
| |
(184,423)
|
| |
|
| |
6,169,403
|
| |
(25,919)
|
| |
|
| |
6,143,484
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Current liabilities
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Accounts payable
|
| |
—
|
| |
4,609
|
| |
(3,942)
|
| |
(e)
|
| |
667
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
667
|
Accrued expenses
|
| |
3,985
|
| |
—
|
| |
(3,985)
|
| |
(e)
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
—
|
Affiliate payable
|
| |
—
|
| |
45,252
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
45,252
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
45,252
|
Commission payable
|
| |
—
|
| |
465
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
465
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
465
|
Deferred service fee income
|
| |
—
|
| |
249
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
249
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
249
|
Other current liabilities
|
| |
—
|
| |
3,489
|
| |
(1,940)
|
| |
(e)
|
| |
1,549
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
1,549
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
| |
3,985
|
| |
54,064
|
| |
(9,867)
|
| |
|
| |
48,182
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
48,182
|
Claims financing obligation & notes payable
|
| |
—
|
| |
106,805
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
106,805
|
| |
28,100
|
| |
(k)
|
| |
134,905
|
Interest payable
|
| |
—
|
| |
94,545
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
94,545
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
94,545
|
Deferred tax liability
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
1,488
|
| |
(g)
|
| |
1,488
|
| |
2,572
|
| |
(g)
|
| |
4,060
|
Warrant liability
|
| |
6,389
|
| |
—
|
| |
(6,389)
|
| |
(h)
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
—
|
Deferred underwriting fee payable
|
| |
8,050
|
| |
—
|
| |
(8,050)
|
| |
(e)
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
—
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
| |
18,424
|
| |
255,414
|
| |
(22,818)
|
| |
|
| |
251,020
|
| |
30,672
|
| |
|
| |
281,692
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Class A common stock subject to possible redemption
|
| |
230,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
(109,470)
|
| |
(b)
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
—
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(120,530)
|
| |
(c)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
As of December 31, 2021
|
| |
|
| |
As of December 31, 2021
|
| |
|
| |
As of December 31, 2021
|
|||||||||
|
| |
LCAP
(Historical)
(US GAAP)
|
| |
MSP Recovery
(As Adjusted)
(Note 3)
|
| |
Transaction
Accounting
Adjustments
(No Redemption
Scenario)
|
| |
Pro Forma
Combined
(No Redemption
Scenario)
|
| |
Transaction
Accounting
Adjustments
(Expense
Adjusted
Maximum
Redemption
Scenario)
|
| |
Pro Forma
Combined
(Expense
Adjusted
Maximum
Redemption
Scenario)
|
||||||
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
—
|
Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
2
|
| |
(c)
|
| |
4
|
| |
(1)
|
| |
(j)
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
1
|
| |
(d)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
1
|
| |
(h)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value
|
| |
1
|
| |
—
|
| |
(1)
|
| |
(d)
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
—
|
Class V common stock, $0.0001 par value
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
325
|
| |
(i)
|
| |
325
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
325
|
Members’ deficit/capital
|
| |
—
|
| |
5,863,865
|
| |
(5,863,865)
|
| |
(i)
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
—
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
120,528
|
| |
(c)
|
| |
217,114
|
| |
(2,572)
|
| |
(g)
|
| |
208,107
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(35,036)
|
| |
(e)
|
| |
|
| |
47,583
|
| |
(l)
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(39,741)
|
| |
(f)
|
| |
|
| |
(54,018)
|
| |
(j)
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(1,488)
|
| |
(g)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
6,019,296
|
| |
(i)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(5,852,833)
|
| |
(l)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
6,388
|
| |
(h)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Accumulated deficit
|
| |
(18,226)
|
| |
—
|
| |
(21,515)
|
| |
(e)
|
| |
(156,241)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(156,241)
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(485)
|
| |
(e)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
39,741
|
| |
(f)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(155,756)
|
| |
(i)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Stockholders' Equity Attributable to
Stockholders
|
| |
(18,225)
|
| |
5,863,865
|
| |
(5,784,438)
|
| |
|
| |
61,202
|
| |
(9,008)
|
| |
|
| |
52,194
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
| |
—
|
| |
4,348
|
| |
5,852,833
|
| |
(l)
|
| |
5,857,181
|
| |
(47,583)
|
| |
(l)
|
| |
5,809,598
|
TOTAL EQUITY
|
| |
(18,225)
|
| |
5,868,213
|
| |
68,395
|
| |
|
| |
5,918,383
|
| |
(56,591)
|
| |
|
| |
5,861,792
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
| |
230,199
|
| |
6,123,627
|
| |
(184,423)
|
| |
|
| |
6,169,403
|
| |
(25,919)
|
| |
|
| |
6,143,484
|
|
| |
Year Ended
December 31, 2021
|
| |
|
| |
Year Ended
December 31, 2021
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Year Ended
Deember 31, 2021
|
||||||
|
| |
LCAP
(Historical)
(US GAAP)
|
| |
MSP Recovery
(Historical)
(US GAAP)
|
| |
Transaction
Accounting
Adjustments
(No Redemption
Scenario)
|
| |
Pro Forma
Combined
(No Redemption
Scenario)
|
| |
Transaction
Accounting
Adjustments
(Expense
Adjusted
Maximum
Redemption
Scenario)
|
| |
Pro Forma
Combined
(Expense
Adjusted
Maximum
Redemption
Scenario)
|
||||||
Claims recovery income
|
| |
—
|
| |
126
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
126
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
126
|
Claims recovery service income
|
| |
—
|
| |
14,500
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
14,500
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
14,500
|
Total Claims Recovery
|
| |
—
|
| |
14,626
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
14,626
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
14,626
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Operating expenses
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Cost of claims recoveries
|
| |
—
|
| |
190
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
190
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
190
|
General and administrative
|
| |
—
|
| |
12,761
|
| |
485
|
| |
(cc)
|
| |
13,246
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
13,246
|
Professional fees
|
| |
—
|
| |
8,502
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
8,502
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
8,502
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
| |
—
|
| |
343
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
343
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
343
|
Operating and formation costs
|
| |
3,785
|
| |
—
|
| |
(180)
|
| |
(bb)
|
| |
3,605
|
| | | |
|
| |
3,605
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
| |
3,785
|
| |
21,796
|
| |
305
|
| |
|
| |
25,886
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
25,886
|
Operating loss
|
| |
(3,785)
|
| |
(7,170)
|
| |
(305)
|
| |
|
| |
(11,260)
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
(11,260)
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Interest expense
|
| |
—
|
| |
(27,046)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(27,046)
|
| |
(1,124)
|
| |
(ff)
|
| |
(28,170)
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
| |
—
|
| |
1,139
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
1,139
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
1,139
|
Interest earned on marketable securities held in Trust Account
|
| |
15
|
| |
—
|
| |
(15)
|
| |
(aa)
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
—
|
Transaction costs associated with Initial Public Offering
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities
|
| |
6,977
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| | | |
6,977
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
6,977
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income
taxes
|
| |
3,207
|
| |
(33,077)
|
| |
(320)
|
| | | |
(30,190)
|
| |
(1,124)
|
| |
|
| |
(31,314)
|
|
(Provision for) Benefit from income taxes
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
67
|
| |
(dd)
|
| |
67
|
| |
236
|
| |
(dd)
|
| |
303
|
Net income (loss)
|
| |
3,207
|
| |
(33,077)
|
| |
(253)
|
| | | |
(30,123)
|
| |
(888)
|
| |
|
| |
(31,011)
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling members
|
| |
—
|
| |
16
|
| |
(26,340)
|
| |
(ee)
|
| |
(26,324)
|
| |
(1,159)
|
| |
(ee)
|
| |
(27,483)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to
Stockholders
|
| |
3,207
|
| |
(33,093)
|
| |
26,087
|
| |
|
| |
(3,799)
|
| |
271
|
| |
|
| |
(3,528)
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding, Class A
Common Stock
|
| |
23,650,000
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Basic and diluted net income per share, Class A Common Stock
|
| |
$0.11
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding, Class B
Common Stock
|
| |
5,750,000
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Basic and diluted net income per share, Class B Common Stock
|
| |
$0.11
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Basic and diluted pro forma weighted average shares
outstanding, Class A Common stock
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
30,278,631
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
24,877,044
|
Basic and diluted pro forma income per share, Class A Common
stock
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$(0.13)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$(0.14)
|
•
|
LCAP’s audited statement of operations for year ended December 31, 2021 and the related notes included elsewhere in this proxy
statement/prospectus; and
|
•
|
MSP Recovery’s audited combined and consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021 and the related
notes included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
| |
As of December 31, 2021
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
As of December 31, 2021
|
|
| |
MSP Recovery
(Historical)
(US GAAP)
|
| |
MRCS Asset
Acquisitions
|
| |
VRM
Asset
|
| |
MSP Recovery
(As Adjusted)
|
ASSETS
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Current assets
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
| |
1,664
|
| |
|
| |
656,621
|
| |
1,664
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(656,621)
|
| |
|
Affiliate receivable
|
| |
4,070
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
4,070
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
| |
13,304
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
13,304
|
Total Current Assets
|
| |
19,038
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
19,038
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
| |
750
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
750
|
Intangible assets, net
|
| |
84,218
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
84,218
|
Investments
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
4,006,621
|
| |
4,006,621
|
Other assets - Excluded Series and MSP Recovery Claim Series
01
|
| |
|
| |
2,013,000
|
| |
|
| |
2,013,000
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
| |
104,006
|
| |
2,013,000
|
| |
4,006,621
|
| |
6,123,627
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Current liabilities
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Accounts payable
|
| |
4,609
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
4,609
|
Affiliate payable
|
| |
45,252
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
45,252
|
Note payable
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
—
|
Commission payable
|
| |
465
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
465
|
Deferred service fee income
|
| |
249
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
249
|
Other current liabilities
|
| |
3,489
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
3,489
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
| |
54,064
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
54,064
|
Claims financing obligation & notes payable
|
| |
106,805
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
106,805
|
Interest payable
|
| |
94,545
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
94,545
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
| |
255,414
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
255,414
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Equity (Deficit)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Members’ deficit/capital
|
| |
(155,756)
|
| |
2,013,000
|
| |
656,621
|
| |
5,863,865
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
3,350,000
|
| |
|
Equity Attributable to MSP Recovery
|
| |
(155,756)
|
| |
2,013,000
|
| |
4,006,621
|
| |
5,863,865
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
| |
4,348
|
| | | | | |
4,348
|
||
TOTAL EQUITY
|
| |
(151,408)
|
| |
2,013,000
|
| |
4,006,621
|
| |
5,868,213
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
| |
104,006
|
| |
2,013,000
|
| |
4,006,621
|
| |
6,123,627
|
a.
|
Reflects balance sheet reclassifications for presentation alignment between MSP Recovery and LCAP;
|
b.
|
Reflects the redemption of 10,946,369 shares of Class A Common Stock for $109.5 million in connection with the Company
stockholder vote to approve the Extension Amendment and reclassification of cash and investments held in the Trust Account that becomes available to fund the Business Combination;
|
c.
|
Reflects the reclassification of common stock subject to possible redemption to permanent equity at $0.0001 par value;
|
d.
|
Reflects the reclassification of Initial Stockholder shares from Class B Common Stock to Class A Common Stock at the Closing;
|
e.
|
Reflects the settlement of $78.3 million of estimated transaction costs expenses expected to be incurred for the Business
Combination, of which $11.6 million was already paid as of December 31, 2021 and $4.3 million was already expensed as of December 31, 2021. Included in the amount that remains to be settled is $8.1 million for the settlement of LCAP’s
deferred underwriting fee payable incurred during LCAP’s initial public offering due upon completion of the Business Combination, settlement of costs accrued as of the balance sheet date, costs that will be prepaid at the Closing of the
Business Combination, estimated costs for advisory, legal, and other fees that can be deducted against additional paid in capital including those capitalized as prepaids and other current assets, estimates costs that will be expensed as
incurred, and estimated costs to be offset against the net equity of LCAP at the Closing;
|
f.
|
Reflects the reclassification of the historical accumulated deficit of LCAP to additional paid in capital as part of the
reverse recapitalization, which includes the accumulated deficit of LCAP and transaction related costs incurred by LCAP;
|
g.
|
Reflects the net deferred tax liability related to an outside basis difference. A corporation that owns a partnership is
required to record the deferred tax related to its outside basis difference, which reflects the book basis compared to tax basis in the investment in the partnership. Based on the no redemption and expense adjusted maximum redemption
scenarios, the Post-Combination Company would record a deferred tax liability. The actual liability may change based on the facts and circumstances at the time of recording the liability in the books and records of the Post-Combination
Company;
|
h.
|
Reflects the issuance of 11.8 million shares of Class A Common Stock underlying LCAP’s Public Warrants and Private Warrants as
they are expected to be in the money as of Closing when the exercise price is
|
i.
|
Reflects the recapitalization of MSP’s equity and issuance of 2,713.7 million shares of Class V Common Stock as consideration
for the reverse recapitalization and 536.3 million shares of Class V Common Stock in connection with the purchase of assets from VRM and Series MRCS under the no redemption and expense adjusted maximum redemption scenarios, respectively,
at $0.0001 par value. The aggregate consideration of 3.25 billion Up-C Units or shares of Class A Common Stock that is payable to the Members in connection with the Business Combination includes 6.0 million Up-C Units or shares of Class A
Common Stock that will be held in escrow to satisfy each of MSP and the Members’ potential indemnification obligations under the MIPA and released for distribution to the Members on the first anniversary of the Closing, 65.6 million Up-C
Units that may be sold to satisfy the VRM Full Return discussed in Note 3, and 20.0 million Up-C Units to be paid in connection with the Virage Exclusivity Termination. The 536.3 million shares and 20.0 million shares can be in the form
of Up-C Units or shares of Class A Common Stock for the purchase of assets from VRM and Series MRCS as discussed in Note 3, and the Virage Exclusivity Termination, respectively. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet
assumes that consideration will in the form of Up-C Units only;
|
j.
|
Reflects the expense adjusted maximum redemption of approximately 5.4 million shares of Class A Common Stock at a redemption
price of $10.00 per share as of December 31, 2021 for $54.0 million held in trust, which is allocated to Class A Common Stock par and additional paid-in capital using $0.0001 par value per share;
|
k.
|
Reflects cash raised from a loan from Messrs. Ruiz and Quesada (or one of their affiliates) at the Closing in order to satisfy
the condition tied to the MSP Minimum Cash Amount (as defined in the MIPA). The loan will have an annual interest rate of 4% and will mature on the day that is six months from the Closing Date (or, if such day is not a Business Day, the
next Business Day). The maturity date may be extended, at the option of the borrower, for up to three successive six month periods (for a total of 24 months). The loan will be prepayable by the borrower at any time, without prepayment
penalties, fees or other expenses. If the cash of the Post-Combination Company after giving effect to the payment of redemptions and transaction costs is less than $30.0 million, such loan will be made. As cash exceeds $30.0 million in
the no redemption scenario, no adjustment is required under the no redemption scenario. The adjustment in the expense adjusted maximum redemption scenario reflects the maximum amount available to be loaned from the Service Fee Account as
of December 31, 2021, which is deemed to satisfy the Minimum Cash Condition pursuant to the MIPA; and
|
l.
|
Reflects the recognition of 99.1% and 99.2% non-controlling interests as a result of the Up-C structure under the no redemption
and expense adjusted maximum redemption scenario, respectively. The Post-Combination Company will hold all of the voting Class A Units of Opco, whereas the Members (or their designees) will hold all of the non-voting economic Class B
Units of Opco (these Class B Units represent the non-controlling interest in Opco). The ownership percentage of Class V Common Stock held in the Post-Combination Company by the Members (or their designees) will be equivalent to the number
of Class B Units held in Opco, and as such, the non-controlling interest in Opco is 99.1% and 99.2% under the no redemption and expense adjusted maximum redemption scenario, respectively, which is equivalent to the Class V Common Stock
ownership percentage shown in the capitalization table above.
|
aa.
|
Reflects the elimination of interest income earned on the Trust Account;
|
bb.
|
Reflects the elimination of the LCAP administrative service fee paid to the Sponsor that will cease upon the Closing;
|
cc.
|
Reflects the portion of MSP estimated transaction costs for the Business Combination not eligible for
|
dd.
|
Reflects the income tax effect of pro forma adjustments using the current federal corporate tax rate of 21% for the twelve
months ended December 31, 2021 and twelve months ended December 31, 2020, respectively. In the historical periods, neither entity was subject to taxes and as such for pro forma purposes, it is assumed that the combined company would be
subject to at least the minimum federal corporate statutory rate;
|
ee.
|
Reflects the recognition of net income attributable to the 99.1% and 99.2% non-controlling interests as a result of the Up-C
structure under the no redemption and expense adjusted maximum redemption scenarios, respectively. The Post-Combination Company will hold all of the voting Class A Units of Opco, whereas the Members (or their designees) will hold all of
the non-voting economic Class B Units of Opco (these Class B Units represent the non-controlling interest in Opco). The ownership percentage of Class V Common Stock held in the Post-Combination Company by the Members (or their designees)
will be equivalent to the number of Class B Units held in Opco, and as such, the non-controlling interest in Opco is 99.1% and 99.2% under the no redemption and expense adjusted maximum redemption scenario, respectively, which is
equivalent to the Class V Common Stock ownership percentage shown in the capitalization table above. For the periods presented, pro forma net income (loss) of OpCo is allocated to the non-controlling interest based on these respective
pro-rata non-controlling interest percentages in the no redemption and expense adjusted maximum redemption scenarios. The pro forma net income (loss) of OpCo is substantially consistent with the pro forma consolidated net income (loss)
before income taxes, except for certain registrant expenses, including the operating and formation costs of LCAP, and transaction-related expenses allocated to the issuance of the warrants; and
|
ff.
|
Reflects interest expense related to member loans as noted in tickmark k.
|
|
| |
Year Ended
December 31, 2021
|
|||
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
| |
No Redemption
|
| |
Expense
Adjusted
Maximum
Redemption
|
Pro forma net loss attributable to Stockholders
|
| |
$(3,799)
|
| |
$(3,528)
|
Pro forma weighted average Class A Common Stock outstanding
- basic and diluted
|
| |
30,278,631
|
| |
24,877,044
|
Pro forma Class A Common Stock net loss per share
|
| |
$(0.13)
|
| |
$(0.14)
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Pro forma weighted average Class A Common
Stock outstanding - basic and diluted
|
| |
|
| |
|
Class A - LCAP Public Stockholders
|
| |
12,703,631
|
| |
7,302,044
|
Class A - LCAP Initial Stockholders
|
| |
5,750,000
|
| |
5,750,000
|
Class A - LCAP Private and Public Warrants
|
| |
11,825,000
|
| |
11,825,000
|
Total LCAP
|
| |
30,278,631
|
| |
24,877,044
|
Total Shares at Closing(1)(2)(3)
|
| |
30,278,631
|
| |
24,877,044
|
(1)
|
Excludes the 3,250,000,000 shares of Class V Common Stock issued for consideration to the Members for this Business Combination
and probable VRM MSP and Series MRCS asset acquisitions as those shares are non-economic and as such are excluded from the earnings per share calculation. Each Up-C Unit, which consists of one share of Class V Common Stock and one Class B
Unit, may be exchanged for either, at LCAP’s option, (a) cash or (b) one share of Class A Common Stock, subject to the provisions set forth in the LLC Agreement.
|
(2)
|
Shares include the 11,825,000 Class A Common Stock underlying LCAP’s Public Warrants and Private Warrants as they are expected
to be in the money as of Closing when the exercise price could be reduced from $11.50 per warrant to $0.0001 after giving effect to the issuance of the New Warrants. As such, it is assumed that the exercise price falls to less than $11.50
and 100% of the warrants are redeemed for LCAP Class A Common Stock.
|
(3)
|
Shares exclude approximately 1,029,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock underlying approximately 1,029,000,000 New Warrants
that will be issued at Closing to the holders of record of Class A Common Stock on the Closing Date on a pro rata basis after giving effect to any redemptions by holders of Class A Common Stock and the waiver of the right, title and
interest in, to or under, participation in any such dividend by the Members, on behalf of themselves and any of their designees. These are considered out of the money as the exercise price of $11.50 per warrant is higher than the current
LCAP stock price. Such amounts will be affected by the level of redemptions by Public Stockholders and the exercise of New Warrants. See “Summary—Ownership of the Post-Combination Company.”
|
•
|
A proposal to adopt the MIPA and the transactions contemplated thereby. See the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — The Business Combination Proposal.”
|
•
|
A proposal to approve, for purposes of complying with applicable listing rules of Nasdaq the issuance of more than 20% of the
issued and outstanding common stock of the Company and voting power in connection with the Business Combination. See the section entitled “Proposal No. 2 — The Nasdaq Proposal.”
|
•
|
A proposal to adopt the Proposed Charter in the form attached hereto as Annex B. See
the section entitled “Proposal No. 3 — The Charter Approval Proposal.”
|
•
|
Five separate proposals with respect to certain governance provisions in the Proposed Charter, which are being separately
presented in accordance with SEC requirements and which will be voted upon on a non-binding advisory basis.
|
○
|
Proposal No. 4A: Change in Authorized Shares—To (i) increase the Company’s total number of authorized shares of capital stock from 111,000,000 shares to 8,760,000,000 shares of capital stock, (ii) increase the Company’s authorized Class A Common Stock from 100,000,000
shares to 5,500,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, (iii) create the Class V Common Stock, consisting of 3,250,000,000 authorized shares of Class V Common Stock and (iv) increase the Company’s authorized shares of Preferred Stock
from 1,000,000 to 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock.
|
○
|
Proposal No. 4B: Dual-Class Stock— To
provide for a capital structure pursuant to which, subject to applicable law and the rights, if any, of the holders of any outstanding series of Preferred Stock, the holders of outstanding shares of common stock of the Company will vote
together as a single class on all matters with respect to which stockholders of the Company are entitled to vote under applicable law, the Proposed Charter or the Amended and Restated Bylaws, or upon which a vote of the
|
○
|
Proposal No. 4C: Removal of Directors—To
provide that any director or the entire Board may be removed (i) at any time prior to the Voting Rights Threshold Date by a simple majority voting together as a single class, with or without cause, notwithstanding the classification of
the Board, and (ii) at any time from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date, solely for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 662∕3% of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares of the Corporation generally entitled to vote thereon, voting together as a single class.
|
○
|
Proposal No. 4D: Required Stockholder Vote to Amend Certain Sections of the
Proposed Charter—To provide that, from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date, in addition to any affirmative vote required by applicable law, the approval by affirmative vote of the holders of
at least 662∕3% in voting power of the then outstanding shares of the Company generally entitled to vote is
required to make any amendment to Article Seventh (Board of Directors) or Article Eighth (Written Consent of Stockholders) of the Proposed Charter.
|
○
|
Proposal No 4E: Required Stockholder Vote to Amend the Amended and Restated
Bylaws—To provide that, in addition to any affirmative vote required by the Proposed Charter, any bylaw that is to be made, altered, amended or repealed by the stockholders of the Company shall
receive, at any time (i) prior to the Voting Rights Threshold Date, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority in voting power of the then outstanding shares of the Company generally entitled to vote, voting together as
a single class, and (ii) from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 662∕3% in voting power of the then outstanding shares of stock of the Company generally entitled to vote, voting together as a single class.
|
•
|
A proposal to elect seven directors to serve on the Board until the first annual meeting of stockholders following the Business
Combination, in the case of Class I directors, the second annual meeting of stockholders following the Business Combination, in the case of Class II directors, and the third annual meeting of stockholders following the Business
Combination, in the case of Class III directors, and, in each case, until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified. See the section entitled “Proposal No. 5 — The Director Election
Proposal.”
|
•
|
A proposal to approve and adopt the MSP Recovery, Inc. 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Annex J. See the section entitled “Proposal No. 6 — The Incentive Plan Proposal.”
|
•
|
A proposal to approve the adjournment of the Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, (A) to ensure that any
supplement or amendment to the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus that the LCAP Board has determined in good faith is required by applicable law to be disclosed to Company stockholders and for such supplement or amendment to be
promptly disseminated to Company stockholders prior to the Special Meeting, (B) if, as of the time for which the Special Meeting is originally scheduled, there are insufficient shares of common stock represented (either in person or by
proxy) to constitute a quorum necessary to conduct business at the Special Meeting or (C) to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies if there are insufficient votes for, or otherwise in connection with, the approval of the
Business Combination Proposal, the Nasdaq Proposal, the Charter Approval Proposal, the Director Election Proposal or the Incentive Plan Proposal. See the section entitled “Proposal No. 7 — The Adjournment
Proposal.”
|
•
|
by submitting a properly executed proxy card (including via the Internet or by telephone); or
|
•
|
electronically at the Special Meeting.
|
•
|
you may send another proxy card with a later date;
|
•
|
you may notify the Company’s Secretary in writing before the Special Meeting that you have revoked your proxy; or
|
•
|
you may attend the Special Meeting and vote electronically by visiting and entering the control number found on your proxy
card, voting instruction form or notice you previously received. Attendance at the Special Meeting will not, in and of itself, revoke a proxy.
|
•
|
change the Company’s name to “MSP Recovery, Inc.”;
|
•
|
change the purpose of the Company to “engage in any lawful act or activity for which a corporation may be organized under the
DGCL”;
|
•
|
provide that, upon the Closing of the Business Combination, each share of Class B Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to
the Closing will automatically be converted into one share of Class A Common Stock without any action on the part of any person and, concurrently with such conversion, the number of authorized shares of Class B Common Stock will be
reduced to zero;
|
•
|
(i) increase the Company’s total number of authorized shares of capital stock from 111,000,000 shares to 8,760,000,000 shares
of capital stock, (ii) increase the Company’s authorized Class A Common Stock from 100,000,000 shares to 5,500,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, (iii) create the Class V Common Stock, consisting of 3,250,000,000 authorized shares of
Class V Common Stock and (iv) increase the Company’s authorized shares of Preferred Stock from 1,000,000 to 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock;
|
•
|
provide that each share of Class V Common Stock will automatically be cancelled upon any sale or other transfer of such share
to a third party other than as permitted by the Proposed Charter;
|
•
|
provide that, subject to applicable law and the rights, if any, of the holders of any outstanding series of Preferred Stock,
the holders of outstanding shares of common stock of the Company will vote together as a single class on all matters with respect to which stockholders of the Company are entitled to vote under applicable law, the Proposed Charter or the
Amended and Restated Bylaws, or upon which a vote of the stockholders generally entitled to vote is otherwise duly called for by the Company; provided, however, that except as may otherwise be required by applicable law, each holder of
outstanding shares of common stock of the Company will not be entitled to vote on any amendment to the Proposed Charter that relates solely to the terms of one or more outstanding series of Preferred Stock (including, without limitation,
the powers (including voting powers), if any, preferences and relative, participating, optional, special or other rights, if any, and the qualifications, limitations and restrictions, if any, of such series of Preferred Stock), if the
holders of such affected series are entitled, either voting separately as a single class or together as a class with the holders of any other outstanding series of Preferred Stock, to vote thereon pursuant to the Proposed Charter or the
DGCL; in each such vote, the holders of Class A Common Stock and holders of Class V Common Stock will be entitled to one vote per share of Class A Common Stock or Class V Common Stock, respectively, including the election of directors and
significant corporate transactions (such as a merger or other sale of the Company or its assets);
|
•
|
provide that, subject to applicable law and the rights, if any, of the holders of any outstanding series of Preferred Stock,
the holders of Class A Common Stock will be entitled to receive dividends with respect to shares of Class A Common Stock, when, as and if declared by the Board, while holders of Class V Common Stock will not be entitled to receive
dividends with respect to shares of Class V Common Stock;
|
•
|
provide that the Board (other than those directors, if any, elected by the holders of any outstanding series of Preferred
Stock) will be divided into three classes, as nearly equal in number as possible, designated as Class I, Class II and Class III, and that with respect to the directors of the Board (i) the directors of each class the term of which then
expires will be elected to hold office for a three-year term or until the election and qualification of their respective successors in office, subject to their earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal and (ii) in case of
any increase or decrease, from time to time, in the number of directors (other than those directors, if any, elected by the holders of any outstanding series of Preferred Stock), the number of directors in each class will be apportioned
by resolution of the Board as nearly equal as possible;
|
•
|
provide that until any time prior to the Voting Rights Threshold Date, any director elected by the stockholders generally
entitled to vote may be removed with or without cause by a simple majority voting together as a single class and, any time from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date, any such director may be removed only for cause and only by the
affirmative vote of the holders of at least 662∕3% of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares of the Company generally entitled to vote thereon, voting together as a single
class;
|
•
|
provide that, with respect to directors elected by the stockholders generally entitled to vote, newly created directorships
resulting from an increase in the authorized number of directors or any vacancies on the Board resulting from death, resignation, disqualification, removal or other cause will be filled solely and exclusively by a majority of the
directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by the sole remaining director and any director so elected will hold office until the expiration of the term of office of the director whom he or she has replaced and until his or
her successor is elected and qualified, subject to such director’s earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal;
|
•
|
provide that, prior to the Voting Rights Threshold Date, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority in voting
power of the then outstanding shares of the Company generally entitled to vote, voting together as a single class, and, from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 662∕3% in voting power of the then outstanding shares of the Company generally entitled to vote, is required to alter, amend, make or repeal any provision of the Amended and Restated Bylaws;
|
•
|
provide that the Company will have no interests or expectancy in, or in being offered an opportunity to participate in, and
renounces, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, (i) any corporate opportunity with respect to any lines of business, business activity or business venture conducted by the Relevant Persons and (ii) any corporate opportunity
received by, presented to, or originated by, a Relevant Person after the date of the filing of the Proposed Charter with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in such Relevant Person’s capacity as a Relevant Person (and not in
his, her or its capacity as a director, officer or employee of the Company);
|
•
|
provide that, unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, (i) any derivative action
brought on behalf of the Company, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer, or employee of the Company to the Company or the Company’s stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim
arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, the Proposed Charter or the Amended and Restated Bylaws, or (iv) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine of the State of Delaware, in each case, will be
required to be filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware lacks jurisdiction over any such action or proceeding, then a state court located within the State of Delaware
or the federal district court for the District of Delaware); provided, that the exclusive forum provision does not apply to actions arising under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act;
|
•
|
require that, from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date, in addition to any affirmative vote required by applicable law,
the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 662∕3% in voting power of the then outstanding shares of the Company generally entitled to vote is required to make any amendment to Article
Seventh (Board of Directors) or Article Eighth (Written Consent of Stockholders) of the Proposed Charter;
|
•
|
delete the prior provisions under Article IX (Business Combination Requirements; Existence) of the Proposed Charter relating to
our status as a blank check company; and
|
•
|
provide that, from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date, stockholders may not take action by consent in lieu of a
meeting.
|
•
|
Amending Article I to change the Company’s name to “MSP Recovery, Inc.” Previously, the Company’s name was “Lionheart
Acquisition Corporation II”. The Board believes the name of the Company should more closely align with the name of the Company’s operating business and therefore has proposed the name change.
|
•
|
Amending the prior Article II and renumbering such article as Article Third to provide that the purpose of the Company is “to
engage in any lawful act or activity for which a corporation may be organized under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.” The Board believes this change is appropriate to remove language applicable to a blank check
company.
|
•
|
Amending Article IV to remove the provision that any share of Class B Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to the Closing
will automatically be converted into one share of Class A Common Stock. The Existing Charter provides for the automatic conversion of the issued and outstanding Class B Common Stock, which will no longer be required after the automatic
conversion occurs at Closing.
|
•
|
Amending Article IV to (i) increase the Company’s total number of authorized shares of capital stock from 111,000,000 shares to
8,760,000,000 shares of capital stock, (ii) increase the Company’s authorized Class A Common Stock from 100,000,000 shares to 5,500,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, (iii) create the Class V Common Stock, consisting of 3,250,000,000
authorized shares of Class V Common Stock and (iv) increase the Company’s authorized shares of Preferred Stock from 1,000,000 to 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. The amendment provides for the creation of the Class V Common Stock,
which is required in order to effectuate the closing of the Business Combination. In addition, the increase in the total number of authorized shares provides the Company adequate authorized capital to provide flexibility for future
issuances of shares of common stock if determined by the Board to be in the best interests of the Company, without incurring the risk, delay and potential expense incident to obtaining stockholder approval for a particular issuance.
|
•
|
Amending Article IV to provide for a capital structure pursuant to which, subject to applicable law and the rights, if any, of
the holders of any outstanding series of Preferred Stock, the holders of outstanding shares of common stock of the Company will vote together as a single class on all matters with respect to which stockholders of the Company are entitled
to vote under applicable law, the Proposed Charter or the Amended and Restated Bylaws, or upon which a vote of the stockholders generally entitled to vote is otherwise duly called for by the Company; provided, however, that except as may
otherwise be required by applicable law, each holder of outstanding shares of common stock of the Company will not be entitled to vote on any amendment to the Proposed Charter that relates solely to the terms of one or more outstanding
series of Preferred Stock (including, without limitation, the powers (including voting powers), if any, preferences and relative, participating, optional, special or other rights, if any, and the qualifications, limitations and
restrictions, if any, of such series of Preferred Stock), if the holders of such affected series are entitled, either voting separately as a single class or together as a class with the holders of any other outstanding series of Preferred
Stock, to vote thereon pursuant to the Proposed Charter or the DGCL. In each such vote, the holders of Class A Common Stock and holders of Class V Common Stock will be entitled to one vote per share of Class A Common Stock or Class V
Common Stock, respectively, including the election of directors and significant corporate transactions (such as a merger or other sale of the Company or its assets). The amendment is intended to align the Company’s capital structure with
that of Opco and enables the Members, including John H. Ruiz and Frank C. Quesada, to maintain their leadership of the Company and execute on the Company’s long-term strategy while helping alleviate short-term market pressure on the
Company.
|
•
|
Restating the prior Article V and renumbering such article as Article Seventh to provide that the Board be divided into three
classes, as nearly equal in number as possible, designated as Class I, Class II and Class III. The directors of each class the term of which then expires will be elected to hold office for a three-year term or until the election and
qualification of their respective successors in office, subject to their earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal. In case of any increase or decrease, from time to time, in the number of directors, the number of directors
in each class will be apportioned by resolution of the Board as nearly equal as possible. The amendment is intended to maintain the stability of the Board and to discourage certain types of transactions that may involve an actual or
threatened hostile acquisition of the Post-Combination Company.
|
•
|
Amending Article V and renumbering such article as Article Seventh to provide that any director or the entire Board may be
removed (i) at any time prior to the Voting Rights Threshold Date by a simple majority voting together as a single class, with or without cause, notwithstanding the classification of the Board, and (ii) at any time from and after the
Voting Rights Threshold Date, solely for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 662∕3% of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares
|
•
|
Amending Article V and renumbering such article as Article Seventh to provide that, with respect to directors elected by the
stockholders generally entitled to vote, from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date, (i) newly created directorships resulting from an increase in the authorized number of directors or any vacancies on the Board resulting from death,
resignation, disqualification, removal or other cause will be filled solely and exclusively by a majority of the directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by the sole remaining director and (ii) any director so elected
will hold office until the expiration of the term of office of the director whom he or she has replaced and until his or her successor is elected and qualified, subject to such director’s earlier death, resignation, disqualification or
removal. The amendment is intended to protect the Board from undue influence from potentially self-interested actions by one or a few large stockholders after the Voting Rights Threshold Date.
|
•
|
Amending Article VI and renumbering such article as Article Seventh to provide that, in addition to any affirmative vote
required by the Proposed Charter, any bylaw that is to be made, altered, amended or repealed by the stockholders of the Company shall receive, at any time (i) prior to the Voting Rights Threshold Date, the affirmative vote of the holders
of at least a majority in voting power of the then outstanding shares of the Company generally entitled to vote, voting together as a single class, and (ii) from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date, the affirmative vote of the
holders of at least 662∕3% in voting power of the then outstanding shares of stock of the Company generally entitled to vote, voting together as a single class. The amendment is intended to
protect all stockholders against the potential self-interested actions by one or more large stockholders after the Voting Rights Threshold Date. In addition, the LCAP Board believes that following the Voting Rights Threshold Date, a
supermajority voting requirement encourages any person seeking control of the Post-Combination Company to negotiate directly with the Board to reach terms that are appropriate for all stockholders.
|
•
|
Amending the prior Article X to provide that the Company will have no interests or expectancy in, or in being offered an
opportunity to participate in, and renounces, to the fullest extent permissible by law, (i) any corporate opportunity with respect to any lines of business, business activity or business venture conducted by the Relevant Persons and
(ii) any corporate opportunity received by, presented to, or originated by, a Relevant Person after the date of the filing of the Proposed Charter with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in such Relevant Person’s capacity as
a Relevant Person (and not in his, her or its capacity as a director, officer or employee of the Company). The prior Article X provided that the doctrine of corporate opportunity would not apply to the Company or any of its officers or
directors where it would conflict with any fiduciary duties or contractual obligations, unless it was offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of the Post-Combination Company. The LCAP Board believes
that this change is appropriate to permit the Members, including John H. Ruiz and his affiliates, to continue to operate their respective businesses and such provision was negotiated for specifically by the Members.
|
•
|
Amending the prior Article XI and renumbering such article as Article Thirteenth to require that, from and after the Voting
Rights Threshold Date, in addition to any affirmative vote required by applicable law, the approval by affirmative vote of the holders of at least 662∕3% in voting power of the then
outstanding shares of the Company generally entitled to vote is required to make any amendment to Article Seventh (Board of Directors) or Article Eighth (Written Consent of Stockholders) of the Proposed Charter. The LCAP Board believes
this amendment protects key provisions of the Proposed Charter from arbitrary amendment and prevents a simple majority of stockholders from taking actions after the Voting Rights Threshold Date that may be harmful to other stockholders or
making changes to provisions that are intended to protect all stockholders.
|
•
|
Amending the prior Article VII and renumbering such article as Article Eighth to provide that, from and after the Voting Rights
Threshold Date, stockholders may not take action by consent in lieu of a meeting. The amendment is intended to protect the Board from undue influence from potentially self-interested actions by one or a few large stockholders after the
Voting Rights Threshold Date.
|
Name
|
| |
Age
|
| |
Title
|
Ophir Sternberg
|
| |
51
|
| |
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Paul Rapisarda
|
| |
67
|
| |
Chief Financial Officer
|
Faquiry Diaz Cala
|
| |
46
|
| |
Chief Operating Officer
|
James Anderson
|
| |
72
|
| |
Director
|
Thomas Byrne
|
| |
59
|
| |
Director
|
Thomas Hawkins
|
| |
60
|
| |
Director
|
Roger Meltzer
|
| |
70
|
| |
Director
|
•
|
the appointment, compensation, retention, replacement, and oversight of the work of the independent auditors and any other
independent registered public accounting firm engaged by us;
|
•
|
pre-approving all audit and permitted non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors or any other registered
public accounting firm engaged by us, and establishing pre-approval policies and procedures;
|
•
|
reviewing and discussing with the independent auditors all relationships the auditors have with us in order to evaluate their
continued independence;
|
•
|
setting clear hiring policies for employees or former employees of the independent auditors;
|
•
|
setting clear policies for audit partner rotation in compliance with applicable laws and regulations;
|
•
|
obtaining and reviewing a report, at least annually, from the independent auditors describing (i) the independent auditor’s
internal quality-control procedures and (ii) any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review, or peer review, of the audit firm, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities
within the preceding five years respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the firm and any steps taken to deal with such issues;
|
•
|
reviewing and approving any related party transaction required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K
promulgated by the SEC prior to us entering into such transaction; and
|
•
|
reviewing with management, the independent auditors, and our legal advisors, as appropriate, any legal, regulatory or
compliance matters, including any correspondence with regulators or government agencies and any employee complaints or published reports that raise material issues regarding our financial statements or accounting policies and any
significant changes in accounting standards or rules promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the SEC or other regulatory authorities.
|
•
|
reviewing and approving on an annual basis the corporate goals and objectives relevant to our Chief Executive Officer’s
compensation, evaluating our Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of such goals and objectives and determining and approving the remuneration (if any) of our Chief Executive Officer based on such evaluation;
|
•
|
reviewing and approving on an annual basis the compensation of all of our other officers;
|
•
|
reviewing on an annual basis our executive compensation policies and plans;
|
•
|
implementing and administering our incentive compensation equity-based remuneration plans;
|
•
|
assisting management in complying with our proxy statement and annual report disclosure requirements;
|
•
|
approving all special perquisites, special cash payments and other special compensation and benefit arrangements for our
officers and employees;
|
•
|
if required, producing a report on executive compensation to be included in our annual proxy statement; and
|
•
|
reviewing, evaluating and recommending changes, if appropriate, to the remuneration for directors.
|
•
|
None of our officers or directors is required to commit his full time to our affairs and, accordingly, may have conflicts of
interest in allocating his time among various business activities.
|
•
|
In the course of their other business activities, our officers and directors may become aware of investment and business
opportunities which may be appropriate for presentation to us as well as the other entities with which they are affiliated. Our management may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity
should be presented.
|
•
|
Nomura, the Sponsor, our officers and directors and the underwriters have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect
to any Founder Shares, Private Shares and any Public Shares held by them (other than, in the case of Nomura, Public Shares held directly or indirectly by Nomura on behalf of a third-party client) in connection with the consummation of our
initial business combination. Additionally, Nomura, the Sponsor and our officers and directors have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to any Founder Shares and Private Shares held by them if we fail to consummate our
initial business combination within 18 months after the IPO Closing Date. If we do not complete our initial business combination within such applicable time period, the proceeds of the sale of the private securities held in the trust
account will be used to fund the redemption of our Public Shares, and the Private Warrants will expire worthless. With certain limited exceptions, the Founder Shares will not be transferable, assignable by the Sponsor until the earlier
of: (A) six months after the completion of our initial business combination or (B) subsequent to our initial business combination, (x) if the last reported sale price of our Class A common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as
adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 30 days after our initial business combination, or (y) the date on
which we complete a liquidation, merger, capital stock exchange, reorganization or other similar transaction that results in all of our stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other
property. With certain limited exceptions, the Private Shares, the Private Warrants and the Class A Common Stock underlying such warrants, will not be transferable, assignable or saleable by the initial purchaser of the Private Units or
their permitted transferees until 30 days after the completion of our initial business combination. Since the Sponsor and our officers and directors may directly or indirectly own common stock and warrants, our officers and directors may
have a conflict of interest in determining whether a particular target business is an appropriate business with which to effectuate our initial business combination. Permitted transferees of the Founder Shares would be subject to the same
restrictions.
|
•
|
Our officers and directors may have a conflict of interest with respect to evaluating a particular business combination if the
retention or resignation of any such officers and directors was included by a target business as a condition to any agreement with respect to our initial business combination.
|
•
|
The Sponsor and our officers or directors may have a conflict of interest with respect to evaluating a business combination and
financing arrangements as we may obtain loans from the Sponsor or an affiliate of the Sponsor or any of our officers or directors to finance transaction costs in connection with an intended
|
•
|
In addition, our independent directors will receive a grant of 10,000 shares of Class A Common Stock at the time of the
consummation of the Business Combination. The approximate value of this grant is $100,000 (10,000 shares at a price of $10.00 per share). These shares will come from the pool of Founder Shares and will not result in any dilution to Public
Stockholders or the Members.
|
•
|
the corporation could financially undertake the opportunity;
|
•
|
the opportunity is within the corporation’s line of business; and
|
•
|
it would not be fair to the company and its stockholders for the opportunity not to be brought to the attention of the
corporation.
|
Individual
|
| |
Entity
|
| |
Entity’s Business
|
| |
Affiliation
|
Ophir Sternberg
|
| |
BurgerFi International Inc.
|
| |
Restaurant chain company
|
| |
Executive Chairman
|
|
| |
Lionheart III Corp
|
| |
SPAC
|
| |
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
| |
Lionheart IV Corp
|
| |
SPAC
|
| |
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
| |
Lionheart Capital LLC
|
| |
Real estate investment firm
|
| |
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
| |
Lionheart Management LLC
|
| |
Real estate holding company
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
Out of the Box Holdings LLC
|
| |
Retail space redevelopment company
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
Whitecap Lofts, LLC
|
| |
Retail space redevelopment company
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
6610 Mooretown Road, LLC
|
| |
Retail real estate company
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
Contrarian Retail Partners, LLC
|
| |
Retail real estate company
|
| |
Chairman
|
|
| |
Cigarette Holdings, LLC
|
| |
Own and operate Cigarette Racing Team
|
| |
Non-controlling Member
|
|
| |
RC Lakehouse, LLC
|
| |
Residential real estate holding company
|
| |
Non-controlling Member
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Individual
|
| |
Entity
|
| |
Entity’s Business
|
| |
Affiliation
|
Paul Rapisarda
|
| |
Lionheart Capital LLC
|
| |
Real estate investment firm
|
| |
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
| |
Lionheart Management LLC
|
| |
Real estate holding company
|
| |
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
| |
Lionheart III Corp
|
| |
SPAC
|
| |
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
| |
Lionheart IV Corp
|
| |
SPAC
|
| |
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
| |
Out of the Box Holdings LLC
|
| |
Retail space redevelopment company
|
| |
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
| |
Garrison Capital Advisors LLC
|
| |
Financial consulting and advisory services company
|
| |
Sole Member
|
|
| |
Whitecap Lofts, LLC
|
| |
Retail space redevelopment company
|
| |
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
| |
6610 Mooretown Road, LLC
|
| |
Retail real estate company
|
| |
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
| |
Contrarian Retail Partners, LLC
|
| |
Retail real estate company
|
| |
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Faquiry Diaz Cala
|
| |
Lionheart Capital LLC
|
| |
Real estate investment firm
|
| |
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
| |
BurgerFi International, Inc.
|
| |
Restaurant chain company
|
| |
Chief of Mergers and Acquisitions and Corporate Strategy
|
|
| |
Lionheart III Corp
|
| |
SPAC
|
| |
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
| |
Lionheart IV Corp
|
| |
SPAC
|
| |
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
James Anderson
|
| |
Lionheart III Corp
|
| |
SPAC
|
| |
Director
|
|
| |
Lionheart IV Corp
|
| |
SPAC
|
| |
Director
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Thomas Byrne
|
| |
Lionheart III Corp
|
| |
SPAC
|
| |
Director
|
|
| |
Lionheart IV Corp
|
| |
SPAC
|
| |
Director
|
|
| |
Kaptyn Holding Corp.
|
| |
Electric Vehicle Rideshare Company
|
| |
Co-Founder and Chief Strategy Officer
|
|
| |
New River Capital Partners, LP
|
| |
Private Equity Fund
|
| |
General Partner
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Thomas Hawkins
|
| |
Lionheart III Corp
|
| |
SPAC
|
| |
Director
|
|
| |
Lionheart IV Corp
|
| |
SPAC
|
| |
Director
|
|
| |
Alumni Association of the University of Michigan
|
| |
Educational Outreach
|
| |
Director
|
|
| |
Jumptuit Inc.
|
| |
Data Analytics Technology Company
|
| |
Director
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Roger Meltzer, Esq.
|
| |
DLA Piper LLP (US)
|
| |
Legal services
|
| |
Partner
|
|
| |
Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III
|
| |
SPAC
|
| |
Director
|
|
| |
Lionheart III Corp
|
| |
SPAC
|
| |
Director
|
|
| |
Lionheart IV Corp
|
| |
SPAC
|
| |
Director
|
|
| |
Ubicquia LLC
|
| |
Smart lighting solutions provider
|
| |
Director
|
•
|
each person who is, or is expected to be, the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the
Company or the Post-Combination Company, as applicable;
|
•
|
each of the Company’s directors and executive officers;
|
•
|
each person who will become a director or named executive officer of the Post-Combination Company; and
|
•
|
all directors and officers of the Company, as a group, and of the Post-Combination Company, as a group.
|
|
| |
MSP
|
| |
Company Common Stock
|
| |
Post-Combination Company Shares after Consummation of the Business
Combination
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
No Redemption Scenario
|
| |
Expense Adjusted Maximum Redemption Scenario
|
||||||||||||
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
| |
Percentage
of MSP
|
| |
Class A
Common
Stock
|
| |
Class B
Common
Stock
|
| |
Percentage
of
Company
Common
Stock
|
| |
Class A
Common
Stock
|
| |
Class V
Common
Stock
|
| |
Percentage
of Total
Voting
Power
|
| |
Class A
Common
Stock
|
| |
Class V
Common
Stock
|
| |
Percentage
of Total
Voting
Power
|
5% Holders Pre-Business Combination
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.(1)
|
| |
—
|
| |
1,613,533
|
| |
—
|
| |
8.74%
|
| |
1,613,533
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
1,613,533
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
Nomura Holdings, Inc.(2)
|
| |
—
|
| |
1,537,087
|
| |
—
|
| |
8.33%
|
| |
1,537,087
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
1,537,087
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
Magnetar Financial LLC(3)
|
| |
—
|
| |
1,444,754
|
| |
—
|
| |
7.83%
|
| |
1,444,754
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
1,444,754
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
Bank of Montreal(4)
|
| |
—
|
| |
1,300,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
7.04%
|
| |
1,300,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
1,300,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
Marshall Wace, LLC(5)
|
| |
—
|
| |
1,197,522
|
| |
—
|
| |
6.49%
|
| |
1,197,522
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
1,197,522
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
LCAP Officers and Directors Pre-business Combination
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ophir Sternberg(6)
|
| |
—
|
| |
427,500
|
| |
5,165,000
|
| |
30.31%
|
| |
5,317,275
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
5,317,275
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
Paul Rapisarda
|
| |
—
|
| |
10,000
|
| |
30,000
|
| |
**
|
| |
230,225
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
230,225
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
Faquiry Diaz Cala
|
| |
—
|
| |
17,500
|
| |
52,500
|
| |
**
|
| |
95,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
95,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
Total
|
| |
—
|
| |
7,547,896
|
| |
5,247,500
|
| |
69.34%
|
| |
12,735,396
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
12,735,396
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
James Anderson
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
10,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
10,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
Thomas Byrne
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
10,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
10,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
Thomas W. Hawkins
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
10,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
10,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
Roger Meltzer
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
10,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
10,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
Total
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
12,775,396
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
12,775,396
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
MSP 5% Holders Pre-Business Combination
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John H. Ruiz(7)(9)(11)
|
| |
69.78%(2)
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
2,139,397,170
|
| |
65.22%
|
| |
—
|
| |
2,139,397,170
|
| |
65.33%
|
Frank C. Quesada(8)(10)(11)(12)(13)
|
| |
29.91%(3)
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
897,440,460
|
| |
27.36%
|
| |
—
|
| |
897,440,460
|
| |
27.40%
|
Post-Combination Company Named Executive Officers,
Director Nominees and 5% Holders Post-Business Combination
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John H. Ruiz(7)(9)(11)
|
| |
69.78%(2)
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
2,139,397,170
|
| |
65.22%
|
| |
—
|
| |
2,139,170
|
| |
65.33%
|
Frank C. Quesada(8)(10)(11)(12)(13)
|
| |
29.91%(3)
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
897,440,460
|
| |
27.36%
|
| |
—
|
| |
897,440,460
|
| |
27.40%
|
Ophir Sternberg(1)
|
| |
—
|
| |
427,500
|
| |
5,165,000
|
| |
30.31%
|
| |
5,317,275
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
5,317,275
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
Beatriz Assapimonwait
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
Michael Arrigo
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
Thomas W. Hawkins
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
10,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
10,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
Roger Meltzer
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
10,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
| |
10,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
**
|
Ricardo Rivera(14)
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
Alexandra Plascencia(14)
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
[•]
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
Total(11)
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
5,337,275
|
| |
3,036,837,630
|
| |
92.74%
|
| |
5,337,275
|
| |
3,036,837,630
|
| |
92.89%
|
(1)
|
Based solely upon information contained in a Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 2022, represents 1,613,533 shares of Class A
Common Stock. The business address of Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. is 1-5-5 Otemachi, Chivoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8176, Japan.
|
(2)
|
Based solely upon information contained in a Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 2022, represents 1,537,087 shares of Class A
Common Stock beneficially owned by Nomura Global Financial Products, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Nomura Holdings, Inc., which accordingly may be deemed to beneficially own the shares. The business address of Nomura Holdings, Inc.
is 13-1, Nihonbashi 1-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-8645, Japan.
|
(3)
|
Based solely upon information contained in a Schedule 13G filed on January 28, 2022 by Magnetar Financial LLC (“Magnetar Financial”), Magnetar Capital Partners LP (“Magnetar Capital Partners”), Supernova Management LLC (“Supernova
Management”), and Alec N. Litowitz, represents 1,444,754 shares of Class A Common Stock held for Magnetar Constellation Fund II, Ltd, Magnetar Constellation Master Fund, Ltd, Magnetar Systematic Multi-Strategy Master Fund Ltd,
Magnetar Capital Master Fund Ltd, Magnetar Discovery Master Fund Ltd, Magnetar Xing He Master Fund Ltd, Purpose Alternative Credit Fund Ltd, Magnetar SC Fund Ltd, all Cayman Islands exempted companies; Magnetar Structured Credit Fund, LP,
a Delaware limited partnership; Magnetar Lake Credit Fund LLC, Purpose Alternative Credit Fund - T LLC, Delaware limited liability companies; collectively (the “Magnetar Funds”). Magnetar Financial
serves as the investment adviser to the Magnetar Funds, and as such, Magnetar Financial exercises voting and investment power over the shares held for the
|
(4)
|
Based solely upon information contained in a Schedule 13G filed on February 15, 2022, represents 1,300,000 shares of Class A
Common Stock. The business address of Bank of Montreal is 100 King Street West, 21st Floor, Toronto, M5X 1A1, Ontario, Canada.
|
(5)
|
Based solely upon information contained in a Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 2022, represents 1,197,525 shares of Class A
Common Stock. The business address of Marshall Wace, LLC is George House, 131 Sloane Street, London, SW1X 9AT, UK.
|
(6)
|
In addition to ownership interests held by Mr. Sternberg in his individual capacity, Mr. Sternberg also beneficially owns
Lionheart Investments and Lionheart Equities, LLC, and, when taken together with his individual holdings, owns the reported percentage of beneficial ownership.
|
(7)
|
In addition to ownership interests held by Mr. Ruiz in his individual capacity, Mr. Ruiz also beneficially owns the following
Members, and, when taken together with his individual holdings, owns the reported percentage of beneficial ownership of the MSP Purchased Companies: Jocral Holdings, Jocral Family, and Ruiz Group Holdings Limited, LLC. Reported figures do
not include the approximately (i) 8,070,617 Up-C Units expected to be beneficially owned by John Ruiz II, Mr. Ruiz’s son, in his capacity as a Member, of which Mr. Ruiz disclaims beneficial ownership or (ii) 30,000,000 Up-C Units expected
to be designated to Alex Ruiz, Mr. Ruiz’s son, of which Mr. Ruiz disclaims beneficial ownership.
|
(8)
|
In addition to ownership interests held by Mr. Quesada in his individual capacity, Mr. Quesada also beneficially owns Quesada
Group Holdings LLC, and, when taken together with his individual holdings, owns the reported percentage of beneficial ownership of the MSP Purchased Companies.
|
(9)
|
Reported figures do not include any attributed ownership based on Mr. Ruiz’s investment in VRM, which have been transferred to
affiliated trusts of Mr. Ruiz and of which Mr. Ruiz disclaims beneficial ownership. Messrs. Ruiz and Quesada together invested in VRM, which investment represented a 1.14% ownership interest in VRM. Mr. Ruiz is entitled to 70% of such
investment, and Mr. Quesada is entitled to 30% of such investment. As a result, the indirect beneficial ownership attributable to such affiliated trusts would be 0.8% of VRM.
|
(10)
|
Reported figures do not include any attributed ownership based on Mr. Quesada’s investment in VRM, which have been transferred
to affiliated trusts of Mr. Quesada and of which Mr. Quesada disclaims beneficial ownership. Messrs. Ruiz and Quesada together invested in VRM, which investment represented a 1.14% ownership interest in VRM. Mr. Ruiz is entitled to 70% of
such investment, and Mr. Quesada is entitled to 30% of such investment. As a result, the indirect beneficial ownership attributable to such affiliated trusts would be 0.3% of VRM.
|
(11)
|
In connection with the Business Combination and to provide additional consideration to holders of Class A Common Stock that do
not redeem their shares of Class A Common Stock, the Company intends, subject to compliance with applicable law, to declare a dividend comprising an aggregate of approximately 1,029,000,000 New Warrants, conditioned upon the consummation
of any redemptions by the holders of Class A Common Stock and the Closing, to the holders of record of the Class A Common Stock as of the Closing Date, after giving effect to the waiver of the right, title and interest in, to or under,
participation in any such dividend by the Members, on behalf of themselves and any of their designees. Further, pursuant to the terms of the LLC Agreement, at least twice a month, to the extent any New Warrants have been exercised in
accordance with their terms, the Post-Combination Company is required to purchase from the MSP Principals, proportionately, the number of Up-C Units or shares of Class A Common Stock owned by such MSP Principal equal to the Aggregate
Exercise Price divided by the Warrant Exercise Price in exchange for the Aggregate Exercise Price. The approximately 1,029,000,000 New Warrants will be exercisable for Class A Common Stock representing approximately 31.4% and 31.4% of
total voting power in the no redemption scenario and expense adjusted maximum redemption scenario, respectively, and will be distributed pro rata among each share of Class A Common Stock held at the end of business on the Closing Date,
which is expected to include the 5,750,000 shares of Class A Common Stock into which Founder Shares will convert in connection with the Business Combination. The number of New Warrants to be distributed in respect of each share of
unredeemed Class A Common Stock is contingent upon, and will vary with, the aggregate number of shares of Class A Common Stock that are redeemed in connection with the Business Combination, which may, depending on the redemptions made by
Public Stockholders, result in certain holders becoming beneficial owners of more than 5% of the total voting power following the Business Combination. As such, the beneficial ownership of holders of record of the Class A Common Stock on
the Closing Date reflecting the exercise of New Warrants is not shown above. Assuming redemptions of Public Stockholders who have not waived their redemption rights and full exercise of the New Warrants: (i) directors and officers of the
Company and beneficial owners of more than 5% of outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock, in each case, pre-Business Combination, are expected to hold a total of 322,546,563 and 453,680,722 shares of Class A Common Stock, representing
approximately 9.8% and 13.9% of total voting power and assuming a no redemption scenario and expense adjusted maximum redemption scenario, respectively, (ii) Mr. Ruiz would beneficially own approximately 1,414,485,286 shares of Class V
Common Stock, representing approximately 43.12% and 43.19% of total voting power, assuming a no redemption scenario and expense adjusted maximum redemption scenario, respectively and (iii) Mr. Quesada would beneficially own approximately
593,352,344 shares of Class V Common Stock, representing approximately 18.09% and 18.12% of total voting power, assuming a no redemption scenario and expense adjusted maximum redemption scenario, respectively. For additional impact of
such New Warrant Exercise, see “Summary—Ownership of the Post-Closing Company.”
|
(12)
|
Assumes 25,000,000 Forfeited Units, which will be designated to Opco in connection with the Closing, Following the Closing,
the Post-Combination Company will establish the Bonus Pool, allocations of which may be paid to certain individuals, including executive officers and other employees of MSP, or may be made under the terms of the Incentive Plan, at the
discretion of Messrs. Ruiz and Quesada. The number of Forfeited Units and the number of securities comprising the Bonus Pool may be increased, and greater bonuses may be paid, in order to gross up recipients thereof for any applicable
withholding taxes.
|
(13)
|
Does not include 10,000,000 Up-C Units to be designated from Mr. Quesada to a third party.
|
(14)
|
Does not include any allocations that may be made pursuant to the Bonus Pool, as described in note (12) above.
|
**
|
Represents less than 5%
|
•
|
Claims Recovery. Through our claims recovery services, we acquire
payment claims from our Assignors, leverage our data analytics capability to identify payments that were improperly paid by our Assignors, and seek to recover the full amounts owed to our Assignors against those parties who under
applicable law or contract were primarily responsible.
|
•
|
Chase to Pay Services. Our “chase to pay” service (“Chase to Pay”),
through which we use our data analytics to assist our clients who are healthcare providers to identify, in the first instance, the proper primary insurer at the point of care and thereby avoid making wrongful payments. We are currently
developing the Chase to Pay Platform and are in the initial stages of offering these services.
|
•
|
| |
Medicare Advantage
|
| |
MAOs contract with CMS to administer Medicare benefits to Medicare beneficiaries
pursuant to Medicare Advantage plans; and MAOs, in turn, contract with First Tier and Downstream Entities to assist the MAOs in administering those Medicare benefits.
|
•
|
| |
Medicaid
|
| |
Health coverage provided to eligible low-income adults, children, pregnant women,
elderly adults and people with disabilities.
|
•
|
| |
Commercial Insurance
|
| |
Employer-sponsored purchased health insurance coverage.
|
•
|
Downstream entities (such as MSOs and IPAs) having standing to sue primary plans under the Medicare secondary payer laws;
|
•
|
A plaintiff under the Medicare secondary payer laws not being required to first transmit a demand letter to a Primary Payer;
and
|
•
|
The entering of a settlement agreement with beneficiaries being an example of an instance when a Primary Payer has constructive
knowledge that they owed the primary payments.
|
•
|
Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs)
|
•
|
Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs)
|
•
|
Physicians
|
•
|
Home Healthcare Facilities
|
•
|
Self-Funded Plans
|
•
|
States and Municipalities
|
•
|
Skilled Nursing Facilities
|
•
|
Hospitals / Health Systems
|
1
|
See MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. ACE Am. Ins. Co., 974 F.3d 1305, 1315 (11th Cir. 2020), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 2758, 210 L. Ed. 2d 906 (2021) (finding that “the payment of medical expenses that should have been covered by a primary payer—is precisely the
kind of injury that the Medicare Secondary Payer Act was meant to remove from the Medicare and Medicare Advantage systems”).
|
2
|
42 U.S.C. § 1395w-22(a)(4)(A) (emphasis added); see also W. Heritage, 832 F.3d at 1238 (“An MAO has a statutory right to charge a primary plan when an MAO payment is made secondary pursuant to the MSP.”); ACE, 974 F.3d at 1308-09 (noting that if an MAO “has made a conditional payment, and the primary payer’s ‘responsibility for such payment’ has been ‘demonstrated,’…the
primary payer is obligated to reimburse…the MAO” pursuant to § 1395w-22(a)(4)).
|
3
|
Moreover, the MSP regulations in Part 411 also support the fact that a provider may bill its full
charges for services to primary payers. See 42 C.F.R. § 411.31(b) (stating that, with respect to workers’ compensation plans, no-fault
insurers, and employer group health plans, a provider generally “may bill its full charges and expect those charges to be paid.”).
|
4
|
MSP has entered into settlement agreements to recover amounts in excess of the paid amount. In MSPA Claims 1, LLC v. Ocean Harbor Cas. Ins. Co., Case No. 2015-1946-CA-01, MSP was granted class certification and obtained approval of a class action
settlement agreement,pursuant to which, subject to certain time and threshold limitations, Ocean Harbor has agreed to pay more than the Medicare Fee-for-Service Schedule Rate by 3.5 times, for Medicare Part A emergency services and
Medicare Part D claims, and by 1.6 times, for Medicare Part A non-emergency services, claims for MRI services and Medicare Part B claims. In MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v.
Horace Mann Insurance Company, Case No. 1:20-cv-24419, we entered into a settlement agreement with Horace Mann in which it has agreed to pay matched claims according to applicable commercial rates,
subject to the assertion of certain agreed upon defenses. We believe the difference between the Paid Amount of claims in that case and commercial rates would generally be between 4 to 6 times.
|
(1)
|
The Members have a 50% ownership interest in each of MAO-MSO Recovery, LLC, MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC, MAO-MSO Recovery LLC,
Series FHCP and MAO-MSO Recovery II LLC, Series PMPI.
|
(1)
|
The Members (or their designees) will hold all of the Class B Units of Opco.
|
(2)
|
The Members (or their designees) will hold all of the shares of the Class V Common Stock of the Post-Combination Company, which
are voting, non-economic shares. The shares of Class V Common Stock, together with their accompanying Class B Units of Opco, are convertible on a 1-for-1 basis into shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock (or cash, at the
Post-Combination Company’s option), in accordance with the terms of the LLC Agreement.
|
(3)
|
The Initial Stockholders will hold 5,750,000 shares of Class A Common Stock of the Post-Combination Company. This amount will be
affected by the exercise of outstanding warrants or New Warrants. See “Summary— Ownership of the Post-Combination Company.”
|
(4)
|
The Public Stockholders and holders of Private Shares will hold 12,703,631 shares of Class A Common Stock of the
Post-Combination Company. This amount will be affected by the level of redemptions by Public Stockholders and the exercise of outstanding warrants or New Warrants. See “Summary—Ownership of the Post-Combination Company.”
|
(5)
|
The Post-Combination Company will hold all of the Class A Units of Opco.
|
(6)
|
The MSP Purchased Companies will own 50% of the membership interest in each of MAO-MSO Recovery, LLC, MAO MSO Recovery II, LLC,
MAO-MSO Recovery LLC, Series FHCP and MAO-MSO Recovery II LLC, Series PMPI.
|
$ in billions
|
| |
Year Ended
December 31, 2021
|
| |
Year Ended
December 31, 2020
|
Paid Amount
|
| |
$364.4
|
| |
$ 58.4
|
Paid Value of Potentially Recoverable Claims
|
| |
86.6
|
| |
14.7
|
Billed Value of Potentially Recoverable Claims
|
| |
363.2
|
| |
52.3
|
Recovery Multiple
|
| |
N/A(1)
|
| |
N/A(1)
|
Penetration Status of Portfolio
|
| |
75.6%
|
| |
N/A
|
(1)
|
Each claim line that is paid or is otherwise converted from encounter data to Paid Amount and Billed Amount for which recoveries
can be made have a potential for recovery through different Funnels. As of December 31, 2021, the Company has obtained settlements with two counterparties who have agreed to pay multiples of Paid Amount. However, the settlement amounts
have not been finally tabulated and therefore do not provide a large enough sample to be statistically significant, and are therefore not shown in the table.
|
|
| |
Year Ended December 31
|
|||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
| |
2021
|
| |
2020
|
| |
$Change
|
| |
% Change
|
Claims recovery income
|
| |
$126
|
| |
$255
|
| |
$(129)
|
| |
(51%)
|
Claims recovery service income
|
| |
14,500
|
| |
13,632
|
| |
868
|
| |
6%
|
Total Claims Recovery
|
| |
$14,626
|
| |
$13,887
|
| |
$739
|
| |
5%
|
Operating expenses
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Cost of claims recoveries
|
| |
190
|
| |
172
|
| |
18
|
| |
10%
|
General and administrative
|
| |
12,761
|
| |
14,598
|
| |
(1,837)
|
| |
(13%)
|
Professional fees
|
| |
8,502
|
| |
2,211
|
| |
6,291
|
| |
285%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
| |
343
|
| |
235
|
| |
108
|
| |
46%
|
Total operating expenses
|
| |
21,796
|
| |
17,216
|
| |
4,580
|
| |
27%
|
Operating Income/ (Loss)
|
| |
$(7,170)
|
| |
$(3,329)
|
| |
$(3,840)
|
| |
115%
|
Interest expense
|
| |
(27,046)
|
| |
(20,886)
|
| |
(6,160)
|
| |
29%
|
Other income (expense), net
|
| |
1,139
|
| |
(51)
|
| |
1,190
|
| |
(2,333%)
|
Net loss
|
| |
$(33,077)
|
| |
$(24,266)
|
| |
$(8,811)
|
| |
36%
|
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling
members
|
| |
(16)
|
| |
18
|
| |
(34)
|
| |
(189%)
|
Net loss attributable to controlling members
|
| |
$(33,093)
|
| |
$(24,248)
|
| |
$(8,845)
|
| |
36%
|
|
| |
Years ended
December 31,
|
|||
|
| |
2021
|
| |
2020
|
(in thousands)
|
| |
|
| |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
| |
$2,249
|
| |
$(14)
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
| |
(2,007)
|
| |
986
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
| |
(10,457)
|
| |
9,610
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
| |
(10,215)
|
| |
10,582
|
Cash at beginning of period
|
| |
11,879
|
| |
1,297
|
Cash at end of period
|
| |
$1,664
|
| |
$11,879
|
|
| |
Lease
Payments
|
2022
|
| |
231
|
2023(1)
|
| |
217
|
Total
|
| |
$448
|
(1)
|
Operating lease expires before or during the year ending December 31, 2023
|
Name
|
| |
Age
|
| |
Position
|
Director Nominees
|
| |
|
| |
|
John H. Ruiz
|
| |
54
|
| |
Class III Director
|
Frank C. Quesada
|
| |
41
|
| |
Class III Director
|
Ophir Sternberg
|
| |
51
|
| |
Class III Director
|
Beatriz Assapimonwait
|
| |
59
|
| |
Class I Director
|
Michael F. Arrigo
|
| |
63
|
| |
Class II Director
|
Thomas W. Hawkins
|
| |
60
|
| |
Class II Director
|
Roger Meltzer
|
| |
71
|
| |
Class I Director
|
Executive Officers
|
| |
|
| |
|
John H. Ruiz
|
| |
54
|
| |
Chief Executive Officer
|
Frank C. Quesada
|
| |
41
|
| |
Chief Legal Officer
|
Ricardo Rivera
|
| |
50
|
| |
Chief Operating Officer
|
Alexandra Plasencia
|
| |
36
|
| |
General Counsel
|
[•]
|
| |
[•]
|
| |
Chief Financial Officer
|
•
|
the requirement that a majority of its board of directors consist of independent directors;
|
•
|
the requirement that compensation of its executive officers be determined by a compensation committee comprised solely of
independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities; and
|
•
|
the requirement that director nominees be selected, or recommended for the board of directors’ selection, by a nominating
committee comprised solely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities.
|
•
|
retaining, overseeing the work of and evaluating the independence and performance of independent auditor;
|
•
|
reviewing and discussing with the independent auditors their annual audit, including the timing and scope of audit activities;
|
•
|
pre-approving audit services;
|
•
|
overseeing the financial reporting process and discussing with management and our independent registered public accounting firm
the quarterly and annual financial statements that we file with the SEC;
|
•
|
reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our accounting and internal control over financial reporting and disclosure
controls and policies and procedures;
|
•
|
reviewing and discussing guidelines and policies governing the process by which our senior management assesses and manages our
exposure to risk;
|
•
|
reviewing, and if appropriate, approving or ratifying any to related party transactions and other significant conflicts of
interest;
|
•
|
establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us and the confidential, anonymous
submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;
|
•
|
reviewing our program to monitor compliance with our code of ethics; and
|
•
|
overseeing significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting.
|
•
|
evaluating and determining, and recommending to our Board, the compensation of our executive officers;
|
•
|
administering and recommending to our Board the compensation of our directors;
|
•
|
reviewing and approving our executive compensation plan and recommending that our Board amend these plans if deemed
appropriate;
|
•
|
administering our general compensation plan and other employee benefit plans, including incentive compensation and equity-based
plans and recommending that our Board amend these plans if deemed appropriate;
|
•
|
reviewing and approving any severance or termination arrangements to be made with any of our executive officers; and
|
•
|
reviewing and approving at least annually the corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO and other
executive officers.
|
•
|
identifying, screening and recommending to our Board director candidates for election or re-election;
|
•
|
overseeing the policies and procedures with respect to the consideration of director candidates recommended by stockholders;
|
•
|
reviewing and recommending to our Board for approval, as appropriate, and reviewing disclosure concerning our policies and
procedures for identifying and screening Board nominee candidates, the criteria used to evaluate Board membership and director independence and any policies with regard to diversity on our Board;
|
•
|
reviewing independence qualifications of directors under the applicable Nasdaq rules;
|
•
|
developing and coordinating with management on appropriate director orientation programs; and
|
•
|
reviewing stockholder engagement plan, if any, and overseeing relations with stockholders.
|
•
|
for any transaction from which the director derives an improper personal benefit;
|
•
|
for any act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
|
•
|
for any unlawful payment of dividends or redemption of shares; or
|
•
|
for any breach of a director’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders.
|
•
|
John H. Ruiz, Chief Executive Officer
|
•
|
Frank C. Quesada, Chief Legal Officer
|
•
|
Ricardo Rivera, Chief Operating Officer
|
Name and Principal Position
|
| |
Year
|
| |
Salary
($)(1)
|
| |
Bonus
($)
|
| |
Stock
awards
($)
|
| |
Option
awards
($)
|
| |
Nonequity
incentive plan
compensation
($)
|
| |
Nonqualified
deferred
compensation
earnings
($)
|
| |
All other
compensation
($)(2)
|
| |
Total
($)
|
John H. Ruiz,
Chief Executive Officer
|
| |
2021
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
$739,832(3)
|
| |
$739,832
|
|
| |
2020
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
675,000
|
| |
1,384,090
|
Frank C. Quesada,
Chief Legal Officer
|
| |
2021
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
$355,750(4)
|
| |
$355,750(5)
|
|
| |
2020
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
769,985
|
| |
1,519,985
|
Ricardo Rivera,
Chief Operating Officer
|
| |
2021
|
| |
$400,000
|
| |
$75,000
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
—
|
| |
$475,000
|
|
| |
2020
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
150,000
|
| |
613,462
|
(1)
|
The 2021 base salary amounts represent the actual amounts paid during fiscal year 2021.
|
(2)
|
Amounts reported in the “All Other Compensation” column for 2021 reflect amounts paid to our named executive officers by the Law
Firm for their services to MSP. The relationship between the Company and the Law Firm, which is an entity that is not part of the Business Combination, is fully described in “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—MSP and
the Post-Combination Company—Legal Services-MSP Recovery Law Firm.” In 2021, the total amount of perquisites and personal benefits for each of the NEOs was less than $10,000.
|
(3)
|
This amount includes $89,832 paid by the Law Firm for life insurance premium.
|
(4)
|
This amount includes $5,750 paid by the Law Firm for life insurance premium.
|
(5)
|
This amount includes $400,000 paid by the Law Firm to a limited liability company, which is owned by Mr. Quesada.
|
(1)
|
The Members have a 50% ownership interest in each of MAO MSO Recovery, LLC, MAO MSO Recovery II, LLC, MAO-MSO Recovery LLC,
Series FHCP and MAO-MSO Recovery II LLC, Series PMPI.
|
(1)
|
The Members (or their designees) will hold all of the Class B Units of Opco.
|
(2)
|
The Members (or their designees) will hold all of the shares of the Class V Common Stock of the Post-Combination Company, which
are voting, non-economic shares. The shares of Class V Common Stock are convertible on a 1-for-1 basis into shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock (or cash, at the Post-Combination Company’s option), in accordance with the terms of
the LLC Agreement.
|
(3)
|
The Initial Stockholders will hold 5,750,000 shares of Class A Common Stock of the Post-Combination Company. This amount will be
affected by the exercise of outstanding warrants or New Warrants. See “Summary—Ownership of the Post-Combination Company.”
|
(4)
|
The Public Stockholders and holders of Private Shares will hold 12,703,631 shares of Class A Common Stock of the
Post-Combination Company. This amount will be affected by the level of redemptions by Public Stockholders and the exercise of outstanding warrants or New Warrants. See “Summary—Ownership of the
Post-Combination Company.”
|
(5)
|
The Post-Combination Company will hold all of the Class A Units of Opco.
|
(6)
|
The MSP Purchased Companies will own 50% of the membership interest in each of MAO-MSO Recovery, LLC, MAO MSO Recovery II, LLC,
MAO-MSO Recovery LLC, Series FHCP and MAO-MSO Recovery II LLC, Series PMPI.
|
•
|
are driving technological innovation across the real estate ecosystem;
|
•
|
offer innovative software, hardware, products, operations, or services;
|
•
|
can serve as a platform for expansion, both organically and through further acquisitions, including “roll-ups” of smaller
players;
|
•
|
are established businesses of scale and are poised for continued growth with capable management teams and proven unit
economics, but potentially in need of financial, operational, strategic or managerial enhancement to maximize value; and/or
|
•
|
have seasoned, proven business plans.
|
|
| |
Mean
|
| |
Median
|
2021E Revenue Growth: -16.6% - 116.3%
|
| |
48.5%
|
| |
46.4%
|
2022E Revenue Growth: 23.5% - 80.9%
|
| |
43.3%
|
| |
41.5%
|
2023E Revenue Growth: 18.4% - 90.6%
|
| |
39.4%
|
| |
33.8%
|
2021E EBITDA Growth: -86.8% - 82.8%
|
| |
15.5%
|
| |
29.7%
|
2022E EBITDA Growth: -0.3% - 84.4%
|
| |
41.0%
|
| |
44.6%
|
2023E EBITDA Growth: 17.1% - 90.6%
|
| |
37.6%
|
| |
32.4%
|
2021E Operating Margin: 4.9% - 21.2%
|
| |
12.1%
|
| |
10.3%
|
2022E Operating Margin: 4.3% - 25.6%
|
| |
15.2%
|
| |
15.6%
|
2023E Operating Margin: 4.5% - 27.5%
|
| |
14.3%
|
| |
12.7%
|
2021E EBITDA Margin: 5.7% - 30.0%
|
| |
17.0%
|
| |
15.6%
|
2022E EBITDA Margin: 3.1% - 32.5%
|
| |
14.5%
|
| |
15.8%
|
2023E EBITDA Margin: 5.6% - 33.3%
|
| |
18.3%
|
| |
18.6%
|
|
| |
Mean
|
| |
Median
|
2021E Revenue Growth: -16.1% - 69.7%
|
| |
22.4%
|
| |
15.3%
|
2022E Revenue Growth: -1.0% - 20.9%
|
| |
12.3%
|
| |
14.3%
|
2023E Revenue Growth: 4.9% - 22.6%
|
| |
14.4%
|
| |
12.8%
|
2021E EBITDA Growth: -27.8% - 159.4%
|
| |
38.2%
|
| |
25.9%
|
2022E EBITDA Growth: 4.3% - 20.0%
|
| |
14.5%
|
| |
16.0%
|
2023E EBITDA Growth: 5.2% - 22.1%
|
| |
15.1%
|
| |
17.5%
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
2021E Operating Margin: 0.6% - 57.6%
|
| |
38.7%
|
| |
41.5%
|
2022E Operating Margin: 0.7% - 58.3%
|
| |
39.2%
|
| |
43.4%
|
2023E Operating Margin: 0.7% - 60.0%
|
| |
40.3%
|
| |
50.6%
|
2021E EBITDA Margin: 24.9% - 137.8%
|
| |
65.3%
|
| |
58.1%
|
2022E EBITDA Margin: 27.3% - 143.7%
|
| |
66.8%
|
| |
55.7%
|
2023E EBITDA Margin: 43.2% - 152.2%
|
| |
78.8%
|
| |
58.5%
|
|
| |
Mean
|
| |
Median
|
2021E Revenue Growth: 5.5% - 24.1%
|
| |
10.1%
|
| |
7.5%
|
2022E Revenue Growth: 4.4% - 13.7%
|
| |
7.4%
|
| |
6.5%
|
2023E Revenue Growth: 4.7% - 12.9%
|
| |
7.7%
|
| |
7.3%
|
2021E EBITDA Growth: 6.0% - 61.8%
|
| |
26.2%
|
| |
25.3%
|
2022E EBITDA Growth: 4.7% - 16.8%
|
| |
10.8%
|
| |
9.6%
|
2023E EBITDA Growth: 2.0% - 17.8%
|
| |
9.5%
|
| |
9.5%
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
2021E Operating Margin: 0.3% - 54.6%
|
| |
25.1%
|
| |
24.9%
|
2022E Operating Margin: 0.4% - 55.7%
|
| |
26.3%
|
| |
27.2%
|
2023E Operating Margin: 0.3% - 56.7%
|
| |
28.0%
|
| |
29.3%
|
2021E EBITDA Margin: 17.5% - 59.1%
|
| |
34.9%
|
| |
34.2%
|
2022E EBITDA Margin: 17.7% - 59.8%
|
| |
36.0%
|
| |
36.0%
|
2023E EBITDA Margin: 17.9% - 60.5%
|
| |
36.7%
|
| |
37.9%
|
•
|
businesses that focus on PropTech, a domain in which the Company’s management has a substantial track record, deep experience,
and the technical ability to diligence efficiently.
|
•
|
consider reasonably accepted valuation standards and methodologies to seek businesses, as determined in the sole discretion of
the Company’s officers and directors.
|
•
|
businesses that have generated attractive unit economics at scale, have established and growing revenue streams. The Company
did not expect to acquire startup companies, companies with speculative business plans or companies that are excessively leveraged.
|
•
|
businesses that have a leading, growing or unique niche market position in their respective sectors. The Company expected to
analyze the strengths and weaknesses of target businesses relative to their competitors and seek to invest in one or more businesses that demonstrate advantages when compared to their competitors, including capable management team,
defensible proprietary technology, strong adoption rates and relevant domain expertise.
|
•
|
businesses that have experienced management teams or those that provide a platform to assemble an effective and capable
management team. The Company expected to focus on management teams with a track record of driving revenue growth and creating value for their shareholders.
|
•
|
businesses that will benefit from being publicly listed and can effectively utilize the broader access to capital and the
public profile to grow and accelerate shareholder value creation.
|
•
|
companies that have a leading or niche market position and that demonstrate advantages when compared to their competitors,
which may help to create barriers to entry against new competitors.
|
•
|
businesses that have historically generated, or has the near-term potential to generate, strong and sustainable free cash flow.
|
•
|
Reasonableness of the aggregate consideration to be paid to the Members under the MIPA.
Following a review of the financial data provided to the Company, including certain unaudited prospective financial information of MSP (including, where applicable, the assumptions underlying such unaudited prospective financial
information) and the Company’s due diligence review of MSP’s business, the LCAP Board determined that the consideration to be paid to the Members was reasonable in light of such data and financial information. Additionally, the issuance
of the New Warrants will provide Company stockholders who do not redeem their shares of Class A Common Stock with additional value, which the LCAP Board considered in conjunction with the reasonableness of the aggregate consideration to
be paid to the Members under the MIPA.In this context “reasonable” means (i) given the uniqueness of the MSP business model, that the work done by the third party due diligence advisors supported the “reasonableness” of the assumptions
used to validate the business model, (ii) that the variables considered by the LCAP Board in relation to the financial analysis for the MSP business and the government claims were a reasonable basis to compute the valuation, and
(iii) given the inherent uncertainties in any long-term projections, particularly in a business like MSP’s where there is limited historical financial information to extrapolate, the inclusion of the New Warrants as partial consideration
to Company stockholders who do not exercise their redemption rights provides a meaningful counter-balance to the uncertainties in the projections.
|
•
|
Due Diligence. The Company’s management and advisors conducted due diligence
examinations of MSP, including: commercial, financial, legal and regulatory due diligence, and extensive discussions with MSP’s management and the Company’s management and legal advisors concerning such due diligence examinations of MSP.
|
•
|
Industry and Trends. MSP’s business is based in a serviceable market that has a
long-standing history of improper claim reimbursement concerns, and that the LCAP Board considers attractive, and which, following a review of industry trends and other industry factors (including, among other things, historic and
projected market growth), the LCAP Board believes has continued growth potential in future periods.
|
•
|
Defensive, niche business model, coupled with a first mover advantage has led to MSP
identifying approximately $15 billion of Paid Value of Potentially Recoverable Claims (as of the date of the MIPA) that could be recoverable in the near future. Based on the Company’s discussions with MSP’s management, the
Company’s management understands that MSP has (i) developed over 1,400 proprietary algorithms and has proven experience aggregating, normalizing and analyzing large volumes of data, which has identified approximately $15 billion of Paid
Value of Potentially Recoverable Claims, as of the date of
|
•
|
Commitment of MSP’s Owners. The Members (or their designees) will own approximately
99.1% of the Post-Combination Company, assuming the no redemption scenario and exercise of the Public Warrants, Private Warrants or New Warrants. Such ownership percentage will be affected by the level of redemptions by Public
Stockholders and the exercise of outstanding warrants or New Warrants. See “Summary—Ownership of the Post-Combination Company.” The LCAP Board believes that the Members continuing to own a
substantial percentage of the Post-Combination Company on a pro forma basis reflects such equityholders’ belief in and commitment to the continued growth prospects of MSP going forward.
|
•
|
Lock-Up and Employment Agreements. The LCAP Board considered the agreement by John H.
Ruiz and Frank C. Quesada to be subject to a post-Closing lockup in respect of their Up-C Units and shares of Class A Common Stock, subject to certain exceptions, and to enter into employment agreements with the Post-Combination Company,
which is expected to provide important stability to the leadership and governance of MSP.
|
•
|
Opportunity to introduce an attractive asset class to public investors that has historically
been transacted in private market settings. The Company’s belief that recent transactions involving SPACs indicate a market trend to bring private companies with novel business models and innovative asset classes to the public
markets.
|
•
|
Driven MSP management with diverse experience and an entrepreneurial mindset to bring this
asset class to the public markets. MSP founder, John H. Ruiz, brings more than 30 years of leadership, information technology innovation and a successful track record in large class actions and multi-district litigation. MSP’s
management team has the unique capability to combine data analytics and legal expertise, including having extensive knowledge of applicable recovery laws and track record of successful class action recoveries related to insurance
payments.
|
•
|
Negotiated Transaction. The LCAP Board considered the terms and conditions of the MIPA
and the related agreements and the transactions contemplated thereby, each party’s representations, warranties and covenants, the conditions to each party’s obligation to consummate the Business Combination and the termination provisions,
as well as the strong commitment by both the Company and MSP to complete the Business Combination. The LCAP Board also considered the financial and other terms of the MIPA and the fact that such terms and conditions are reasonable and
were the product of arm’s length negotiations between MSP and the Company.
|
•
|
Other Alternatives. After a review of other business combination opportunities
reasonably available to the Company, the LCAP Board believes that the proposed Business Combination represents the best potential business combination reasonably available to the Company taking into consideration, among other things, the
timing and likelihood of accomplishing the goals of any alternatives.
|
•
|
Post-Closing Governance. The fact that the Sponsor had negotiated the right to nominate
two members of the Board following the Business Combination, which the LCAP Board believes will allow for the Post-Combination Company to benefit from the Sponsor’s professional relationships to identify potential board members that will
have appropriate industry and/or financial knowledge and professional experience to oversee the Post-Combination Company and drive returns for stockholders.
|
•
|
Unique Social Focus. The LCAP Board considered MSP’s unique social focus on supporting
the long-term sustainability of Medicare and Medicaid programs relied upon by over 100 million Americans.
|
•
|
Proprietary Data System. The LCAP Board’s belief that MSP has a proprietary data system
that has proven experience aggregating, normalizing and analyzing large volumes of data to identify recoverable healthcare claims.
|
•
|
Key Man Risk: John H. Ruiz and Frank C. Quesada are key business drivers of MSP and
the success of MSP remains highly dependent on their continued involvement.
|
•
|
Benefits May Not Be Achieved. The potential benefits of the Business Combination may
not be fully achieved or may not be achieved within the expected timeframe.
|
•
|
Validity of Claims underlying MSP’s business model, and other risks relating to MSP’s business
model. The risks relating to the fact that the validity of MSP’s claim assignments, legal standing of the MSP claims, penalties and double damages provisions, and other key legal issues remain subject to continued affirmation in
the U.S. court system. Additionally, the LCAP Board considered the risks associated with the fact that healthcare insurers and other Assignors continue to revise expense policies which may limit the size of future pools of claims relevant
to MSP’s business.
|
•
|
Regulation. The risk that changes in the regulatory and legislative landscape or new
industry developments may adversely affect the projected financial results and the other business benefits anticipated to result from the Business Combination, including the risk that the Medicare Secondary Payer Act of 1980 remains
subject to legal interpretation and potential revision.
|
•
|
Scale of Operations. While the MSP management has modeled the expected expenses, they
have not previously operated at a scale indicated in the MSP management projections nor executed on the scale of growth contemplated.
|
•
|
Stockholder Vote. The Company’s stockholders may fail to approve the proposals
necessary to effect the Business Combination.
|
•
|
Closing Conditions. The completion of the Business Combination is conditioned on the
satisfaction of certain closing conditions that are not within the Company’s control, including the receipt of certain required regulatory approvals.
|
•
|
The Public Stockholders Holding a Minority Position in the Post-Combination Company.
The Public Stockholders will hold a minority position in the Post-Combination Company approximately 0.4%, assuming (1) the no redemption scenario and (2) that the holders of the Company’s existing Public Warrants and Private Warrants
exercise those warrants, and no New Warrants are exercised, as such, the Company’s current stockholders are unlikely to have an influence on the management of the Post-Combination Company. Such ownership percentage will be affected by the
level of redemptions by Public Stockholders and the exercise of outstanding warrants or New Warrants. See “Summary—Ownership of the Post-Combination Company.”
|
•
|
Due Diligence. Legal due diligence review from the Company’s advisor raised concerns
over internal controls and documentation related to HIPAA compliance and data protection.
|
•
|
No PIPE Investment. The risk posed by the fact that there is no PIPE as part of the
Business Combination, since public investors often rely on PIPE investors for third-party validation of the valuation of a transaction.
|
•
|
Litigation Related to the Business Combination. The possibility of litigation
challenging the Business Combination or that an adverse judgment granting permanent injunctive relief could indefinitely enjoin consummation of the Business Combination.
|
•
|
Listing Risks. The challenges associated with preparing MSP, which is a private
company, for the applicable disclosure and listing requirements to which MSP will be subject as a publicly traded company.
|
•
|
Financial Condition: As of the date the LCAP Board approved the Business Combination,
MSP did not have any combined or consolidated historical financial statements, and therefore the LCAP Board could not consider MSP’s historical financial results or historical and current balance sheet information in conjunction with its
consideration of other financial information of MSP in making its determination. Once MSP’s audited financial statements became available, the LCAP Board reviewed the audited financial statements in conjunction with the other unaudited
financial data available to it and continued to recommend the Business Combination. See “Risk Factors—The Sponsor, certain members of the LCAP
|
•
|
Market Volatility: The possibility that the SPAC market experiences volatility and
disruptions, causing deal disruption.
|
•
|
Liquidation. The risks and costs to the Company if the Business Combination is not
completed, including the risk of diverting management focus and resources from other business combination opportunities, which could result in the Company being unable to effect an initial business combination by August 18, 2022.
|
•
|
No Third-Party Valuation. The LCAP Board did not obtain a third-party valuation or
fairness opinion in connection with the Business Combination.
|
•
|
Fees and Expenses. The fees and expenses associated with completing the Business
Combination. In addition, the LCAP Board considered the fact that Nomura has contingent fees owing to it upon the successful completion of the Business Combination, consisting of (a) an M&A fee of $20 million and (b) deferred
underwriting fees of approximately $4.4 million. The LCAP Board did not believe such fees would be such a conflict of interest that it should prevent Nomura from serving as financial advisor to the Company in evaluating and advising on
the Business Combination.
|
•
|
Risks related to VRM: MSP has entered into certain arrangements with VRM and its
affiliates, which include preferred returns on cash distributions, which may impact existing and new investors. (see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” beginning on page [247]).
|
•
|
Interests of Certain Persons. The Sponsor, our officers and certain of our directors
may have interests in the Business Combination (see “— Interests of the Company’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination”).
|
•
|
Other Risk Factors. Various other risk factors associated with the business of MSP, as
described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” appearing elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus.
|
$ in millions
|
| |
2021
|
| |
2022
|
| |
2023
|
| |
2024
|
| |
2025
|
| |
2026
|
Forecasted New Potentially Recoverable Claims to MSP(2)
|
| |
$5,931
|
| |
$5,862
|
| |
$7,214
|
| |
$6,322
|
| |
$4,683
|
| |
$4,888
|
Estimated Paid Value of Potentially Recoverable Claims(3)
|
| |
$20,993
|
| |
$26,856
|
| |
$34,070
|
| |
$40,392
|
| |
$45,075
|
| |
$49,963
|
Cumulative % of Potentially Recoverable
Claims Recovered(4)
|
| |
0%
|
| |
2%
|
| |
7%
|
| |
19%
|
| |
35%
|
| |
51%
|
Cumulative Recoveries(5)
|
| |
$—
|
| |
$535
|
| |
$2,328
|
| |
$7,514
|
| |
$15,915
|
| |
$25,471
|
Implied Annual Recoveries(6)
|
| |
$—
|
| |
$535
|
| |
$1,793
|
| |
$5,186
|
| |
$8,400
|
| |
$9,556
|
Estimated Recovery Multiple of Annual
Recoveries(7)
|
| |
NM
|
| |
1.9 x
|
| |
1.7 x
|
| |
2.1 x
|
| |
2.4 x
|
| |
2.5 x
|
Gross Annual Recoveries(8)
|
| |
NM
|
| |
$992
|
| |
$3,105
|
| |
$10,744
|
| |
$20,371
|
| |
$23,765
|
Net Recoveries To MSP(9)
|
| |
$—
|
| |
$342
|
| |
$963
|
| |
$3,252
|
| |
$6,139
|
| |
$7,247
|
After-Tax Net Income to MSP(10)
|
| |
$(37)
|
| |
$204
|
| |
$632
|
| |
$2,313
|
| |
$4,434
|
| |
$5,232
|
(1)
|
This section is a non-GAAP financial projection and reflects all claims of which MSP takes assignment, as well as those claims
owned by a third party but to which MSP is entitled to a recovery percentage. These projections do not include potential recoveries from Government Related Recoveries or interest expense accruals. Totals may not sum due to rounding.
|
(2)
|
Forecasted New Potentially Recoverable Claims to MSP (“NPRC”) represents MSP’s good faith estimates of the portion of Paid
Amount in respect of new claims to which MSP would be entitled to receive a portion of recovery proceeds (typically 50%), as analyzed through MSP’s approximately 600 Funnels and 1,100 Layers. NPRC is calculated first by estimating the
total annual Medicare and Medicaid spend across four modules, representing Accident Claims within the Medicare Advantage market (reflecting such claims in the private sector of the Medicare Program), Other Claims within Medicare Advantage
market (reflecting such claims in the private sector of the Medicare Program), Original Medicare market (reflecting the public sector of the Medicare Program) and Medicaid market. The total annual Medicare and Medicaid spend is estimated
for each year in the forecast period based on historical annual growth rates in Medicare and Medicaid spend. The total spend in the Accident Claims and Other Claims modules is then adjusted to reflect an assumed level of administrative
costs (i.e., the medical loss ratio) of 15%, to account for the private sector nature of such modules, consistent with the standardized 15% medical loss ratio provided by CMS. The resulting adjusted spend equals the annual total
addressable market opportunity within the Accident Claims and Other Claims modules. Of the annual total addressable market opportunity in each module, MSP management calculates claims that could represent a recovery opportunity within
each module, based on the assumption that 8-10% of annual medical claims are accident related and 2% of claims are related to fraud and misconduct, consistent with historical market data on such claims. MSP then estimates its new market
share for each year in each module in good faith, and the new market share is then multiplied by recoverable opportunities for each module. The resulting amounts for each module are then aggregated to calculate NPRC. NPRC for each of the
years shown reflects MSP market penetration of less than 1%.
|
(3)
|
Estimated Paid Value of Potentially Recoverable Claims (“EPVPRC”) represents the cumulative Paid Amount of potentially
recoverable claims to which MSP would be entitled to receive a portion of recovery proceeds (typically 50%), as analyzed through MSP’s approximately 600 Funnels and 1,100 Layers. EPVPRC for the year ending December 31, 2021 was calculated
by adding $15.062 billion of Paid Claims held by MSP as of December 31, 2020 with Forecasted NPRC to MSP for the year ending December 31, 2021. EPVPRC for each of the years ending December 31, 2022 through 2026 is calculated by adding
NPRC to EPVPRC for the prior year.
|
(4)
|
Represents MSP management’s good faith estimate of the timing of reaching recovery settlements or other resolutions. MSP
management produced this estimate based on the nature of the claims then held and forecasted to be held in MSP’s claim’s portfolio, the stages of MSP’s claims portfolio in terms of the recovery process, as well as MSP management’s
experience with claims recovery.
|
(5)
|
Represents EPVPRC multiplied by Cumulative % of Potentially Recoverable Claims Recovered
|
(6)
|
Implied Annual Recoveries for a given year is calculated by subtracting the Cumulative Recoveries for the prior year, from the
Cumulative Recoveries for such year.
|
(7)
|
Represents MSP management’s good faith estimate of potential upside from claims recoveries that may result from payment to MSP,
based on MSP management’s experience with claims recovery.
|
(8)
|
Represents Implied Annual Recoveries multiplied by Estimated Recovery Multiple on Annual Recoveries.
|
(9)
|
Represents Gross Annual Recoveries after paying assignor interests and contingent legal fees, and represents portion of
recoveries that are forecasted to be recognized as part of MSP’s gross revenues. Assigner interests are equal to 50% of Gross Annual Recoveries through 2025 and 55% of Gross Annual Recoveries in 2026; contingent legal fees (including
amounts paid to the Law Firm) equal 40% of Gross Annual Recoveries net of assignor interests through 2025 and 32.5% of Gross Annual Recoveries net of assignor interests in 2026, reflective of a shift to revenue less dependent on legal
process.
|
(10)
|
Represents Net Recoveries to MSP minus operating expenses and taxes, and reflects the assumption that MSP will see cost
reduction efficiencies in operating expenses as its claims portfolio grows.
|
•
|
the fact that our Initial Stockholders have agreed not to redeem any of the Founder Shares in connection with a stockholder
vote to approve the proposed Business Combination;
|
•
|
the fact that Ophir Sternberg, Tom Hawkins and Roger Metzler will serve as directors of the Post-Combination Company;
|
•
|
the fact that Ophir Sternberg is party to certain joint business ventures with John Ruiz, as described under “Interests of MSP’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Business Combination—RC Lakehouse, LLC” and “Interests of MSP’s Directors and Executive Officers in the
Business Combination—Cigarette Holdings, LLC”;
|
•
|
the fact that the Sponsor paid an aggregate of $25,000 for 5,000,000 Founder Shares in January 2020 and, in February 2020, the
Company declared a stock dividend of 0.15 share for each Founder Share outstanding, resulting in the Sponsor holding an aggregate of 5,750,000 Founder Shares. After giving effect to the sales or transfer of Founder Shares to Nomura and in
connection with the IPO to certain insiders, the remaining 5,667,500 Founder Shares will have a significantly higher value at the time of the Business Combination, which if unrestricted and freely tradable would be valued at approximately
$56,675,000 but, given the restrictions on such shares, we believe such shares have less value. In addition, given the differential in the purchase price that our Sponsor paid for the Founder Shares as compared to the price of the units
sold in the IPO and the substantial number of shares of Class A Common Stock that our Sponsor will receive upon conversion of the Founder Shares in connection with the Business Combination, our Sponsor and its affiliates may earn a
positive rate of return on their investment even if the common stock of the combined company trades below the price initially paid for the units in the IPO and the Public Stockholders experience a negative rate of return following the
completion of the Business Combination;
|
•
|
the fact that our Initial Stockholders have agreed to waive their rights to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account
with respect to their Founder Shares if we fail to complete an initial business combination by August 18, 2022 (or such later date as may be approved by the Company’s stockholders);
|
•
|
the fact that our Initial Stockholders, being holders of Class A Common Stock, are eligible to receive the dividend comprised
of the New Warrants to be issued upon the automatic conversion of the Founder Shares at Closing, and the fact that, because our Initial Stockholders have agreed not to redeem their shares in connection with the Business Combination, they
may receive a significant number of such New Warrants, if other holders of Class A Common Stock elect to exercise their redemption rights;
|
•
|
the fact that the Sponsor paid an aggregate of $5,950,000 for Private Units comprised of 297,500 Private Warrants to purchase
shares of Class A Common Stock and that such Private Warrants will expire worthless if a business combination is not consummated by August 18, 2022;
|
•
|
the continued right of the Sponsor to hold Class A Common Stock and the shares of Class A Common Stock to be issued to the
Sponsor upon exercise of its Private Warrants following the Business Combination, subject to certain lock-up periods;
|
•
|
if the Trust Account is liquidated, including in the event we are unable to complete an initial business combination within the
required time period, the Sponsor has agreed to indemnify us to ensure that the proceeds in the Trust Account are not reduced below $10.00 per Public Share, or such lesser per Public Share amount as is in the Trust Account on the
liquidation date, by the claims of prospective target businesses with which we have entered into an acquisition agreement or claims of any third party (other than our independent public accountants) for services rendered or products sold
to us, but only if such a vendor or target business has not executed a waiver of any and all rights to seek access to the Trust Account;
|
•
|
the Sponsor (including its representatives and affiliates) and the Company directors and officers, are, or may in the future
become, affiliated with entities that are engaged in a similar business to the Company. For example, each of the Company’s officers may be considered an affiliate of the Sponsor and directors and officers of the Company are also
affiliated with Lionheart III and Lionheart IV, all of which are blank check companies incorporated for the purpose of effecting their respective initial business combinations. In addition, Mr. Meltzer serves on the board of directors of
Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III, a blank check company incorporated for the purpose of effecting a business combination. The Sponsor and the Company’s directors and officers are not prohibited from sponsoring, or otherwise becoming
involved with, any other blank check companies prior to the Company completing its initial business combination. Moreover, certain of the Company’s directors and officers have time and attention requirements for certain other companies.
The Company’s directors and officers also may become aware of business opportunities which may be appropriate for presentation to the Company, and the other entities to which they owe certain fiduciary or contractual duties, including
Lionheart III and Lionheart IV. Accordingly, they may have had conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented.
|
•
|
the continued indemnification of our existing directors and officers and the continuation of our directors’ and officers’
liability insurance after the Business Combination;
|
•
|
the fact that our independent directors will receive a grant of 10,000 shares of Class A Common Stock at the time of the
consummation of the Business Combination. The approximate value of this grant is $100,000 (10,000 shares at $10.00 per share). These shares will come from the pool of Founder Shares and will not result in any dilution to Public
Stockholders or the Members;
|
•
|
the fact that the Sponsor and our directors and officers will lose their entire investment in us and will not be reimbursed for
any out-of-pocket expenses if an initial business combination is not consummated by August 18, 2022; and
|
•
|
that, at the closing of the Business Combination we will enter into the amended and restated registration rights agreement with
the Sponsor and our directors and officers which provides for registration rights to such persons and their permitted transferees.
|
Sources and Uses
No Redemption Scenario
(in millions)
|
|||||||||
Sources
|
| |
|
| |
Uses
|
| |
|
Company Cash in Trust Account(1)
|
| |
$121
|
| |
Remaining Cash to Balance Sheet(1)(4)
|
| |
$43
|
PIPE
|
| |
0
|
| |
Company Estimated Transaction Cost(4)
|
| |
78
|
Member rollover(2)
|
| |
32,500
|
| |
Member rollover(2)
|
| |
32,500
|
Total Sources
|
| |
$32,621
|
| |
Total Uses
|
| |
$32,621
|
(1)
|
Assumes that no additional shares of Class A Common Stock are redeemed (after giving effect to the redemption of
10,946,369 shares of Class A Common Stock in connection with the Company stockholder vote to approve the Extension Amendment). This amount will be reduced by the amount of cash used to satisfy any redemptions.
|
(2)
|
Represents Up-C Units (or shares of Class A Common Stock) equal to $32.5 billion divided by $10.00.
|
Sources and Uses
Expense Adjusted Maximum Redemption Scenario
(in millions)
|
|||||||||
Sources
|
| |
|
| |
Uses
|
| |
|
Company Cash in Trust Account(1)
|
| |
$69
|
| |
Remaining Cash to Balance Sheet(1)
|
| |
$19
|
Cash from Members(2)
|
| |
28
|
| |
Company Estimated Transaction Cost(4)
|
| |
78
|
Member rollover (3)
|
| |
32,500
|
| |
Member rollover(3)
|
| |
32,500
|
Total Sources
|
| |
$32,597
|
| |
Total Uses
|
| |
$32,597
|
(1)
|
Assumes that 5,401,587 shares of Class A Common Stock are redeemed for an aggregate payment of approximately $54.0 million
(based on the estimated per share redemption price of approximately $10.00 per share) from the Trust Account. The remaining shares not redeemed include 650,000 shares of Class A Common Stock that are not subject to redemption as the
shareholders have waived redemption rights. Cash available for maximum redemptions is calculated as the cash in trust less remaining transaction costs to be paid in cash reflected in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance
sheet.
|
(2)
|
Represents an assumed cash contribution raised from a loan from Messrs. Ruiz and Quesada (or their affiliates) at the Closing in
order to satisfy the condition tied to the MSP Minimum Cash Amount (as defined in the MIPA), assuming cash and cash equivalents of MSP as of December 31, 2021.
|
(3)
|
Represents Up-C Units (or shares of Class A Common Stock) equal to $32.5 billion divided by $10.00.
|
(4)
|
Reflects the settlement of $78.3 million of estimated transaction costs expenses expected to be incurred for the Business
Combination, of which $11.6 million was already paid as of December 31, 2021 and $4.2 million was already expensed as of December 31, 2021. Included in the amount that remains to be settled is $8.1 million for the settlement of the
Company’s deferred underwriting fee payable incurred during the IPO, due upon completion of the Business Combination, settlement of costs accrued as of the balance sheet date, costs that will be prepaid at the Closing, estimated costs for
advisory, legal, and other fees that can be deducted against additional paid in capital including those capitalized as prepaids and other current assets, estimates costs that will be expensed as incurred, and estimated costs to be offset
against the net equity of the Company at the Closing.
|
•
|
amend, modify or supplement its certificate of formation, operating agreement or other organizational documents;
|
•
|
amend, waive any material rights under or provision of, terminate prior to its scheduled expiration date, or otherwise
compromise in any material way, any material contract or enter into any contract that, if in effect of the date hereof, would constitute a material contract;
|
•
|
sell, lease, license or otherwise dispose of any material assets of MSP, taken as a whole, except pursuant to existing
contracts or commitments disclosed herein and for licenses granted in the ordinary course of business;
|
•
|
pay, declare, or agree to pay any distributions with respect to the MSP membership interests, or pay, declare or agree to pay
any other payments to any Member;
|
•
|
except as otherwise required pursuant to any MSP Company Plan (as defined in the MIPA) in effect on the date of the MIPA, grant
any material increase in salary to any director or officer of MSP or change the bonus or profit-sharing policies of MSP, other than changes that do not result in a material increase in the cost of such benefits;
|
•
|
obtain or incur any loan or other indebtedness, excluding drawings under existing lines of credit;
|
•
|
grant or incur any material lien, except for certain permitted liens, on the assets of MSP;
|
•
|
delay, accelerate or cancel any receivables or indebtedness owed to MSP or write off or make further reserves against the same,
except, in each case, in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice or as required by GAAP;
|
•
|
except as contemplated by the MIPA and the ancillary agreements, merge or consolidate with or acquire any other entity or be
acquired by any other entity or person;
|
•
|
voluntarily fail to maintain insurance policies covering the assets of MSP in a form and amount consistent with past practices;
|
•
|
make any material change in its accounting principles or methods or write down the value of any inventory or assets of MSP, in
each case, except as required by GAAP;
|
•
|
change the principal place of business or jurisdiction of organization of MSP;
|
•
|
make any loans, other than travel or other expense advances to employees in the ordinary course of business not to exceed
$10,000 individually or $100,000 in the aggregate and prepayments and deposits paid to suppliers of MSP in the ordinary course of business; except as contemplated by the MIPA and certain ancillary agreements, issue, redeem or repurchase
any MSP membership interests or other securities in MSP or issue any securities exchangeable for or convertible into MSP membership interests;
|
•
|
except as otherwise required by applicable law, make or change any material tax election (other than with respect to MSP
Recovery of Puerto Rico, LLC), change any annual tax accounting periods, amend any material tax return, prepare or file any tax return materially inconsistent with past practice or, on any such tax return, take any position, make any
election, or adopt any method that is materially inconsistent with positions taken, elections made or methods used in preparing or filing similar tax returns in prior periods (including materially inconsistent positions, elections or
methods that would have the effect of deferring income to periods ending after the Closing Date or accelerating deductions to periods ending on or before the Closing Date); settle or otherwise compromise any material claim relating to
taxes, enter into any closing agreement or similar agreement relating to taxes, otherwise settle any material dispute relating to taxes, or request any ruling or similar guidance with respect to a material amount of taxes; provided, that
the Company’s prior consent is not required with respect to any of the foregoing actions where a person who is not a party to the MIPA is able to undertake such action with respect to MSP without the consent or any action on the part of
any party to the MIPA; or
|
•
|
agree to do any of the actions above.
|
•
|
change, modify or amend the Investment Management Trust Agreement, the Sponsor Agreement, or their respective organizational
documents;
|
•
|
declare, set aside or pay any dividends on, or make any other distribution in respect of any outstanding capital stock of, or
other equity interests in, the Company or Opco, split, combine or reclassify any capital stock of, or other equity interests in, the Company or Opco; or other than (x) in connection with the stockholder redemption or (y) as otherwise
required by the organizational documents of the Company or Opco in order to consummate the transactions contemplated by the MIPA, repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, or offer to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, any capital
stock of, or other equity interests in, the Company or Opco;
|
•
|
subject to certain exceptions, make, change or revoke any material tax election, adopt or change any material accounting method
with respect to taxes, file any amended material tax return, settle or compromise any material tax liability, enter into any material closing agreement with respect to any tax, surrender any right to claim a material refund of taxes or
consent to any extension or waiver of the limitations period applicable to any material tax claim or assessment or enter into any tax sharing or tax indemnification agreement (except, in each case, for such agreements that are commercial
contracts not primarily relating to taxes) or similar agreement or take any similar action relating to taxes, if such election, change, amendment, agreement, settlement, consent or other action would have the effect of materially
increasing the present or future tax liability or materially decreasing any present or future tax asset of the Company or Opco or MSP in a manner that will disproportionately affect the Members (as compared to the Company’s stockholders)
after the Closing;
|
•
|
enter into, renew or amend in any material respect, any transaction or contract with an affiliate of the Company (including,
for the avoidance of doubt, (x) the Sponsors or anyone related by blood, marriage or adoption to any Sponsor and (y) any Person in which any Sponsor has a direct or indirect legal, contractual or beneficial ownership interest of 5% or
greater);
|
•
|
waive, release, compromise, settle or satisfy any pending or threatened material claim (which shall include, but not be limited
to, any pending or threatened action) or compromise or settle any liability;
|
•
|
incur, guarantee or otherwise become liable for (whether directly, contingently or otherwise) any indebtedness;
|
•
|
offer, issue, deliver, grant or sell, or authorize or propose to offer, issue, deliver, grant or sell, any capital stock of, or
other equity interests, equity equivalents, stock appreciation rights, phantom stock ownership interests or similar rights in, the Company or Opco or any securities convertible into, or any rights, warrants or options to acquire, any such
capital stock or equity interests, other than issuance of Class A Common Stock in connection with the exercise of any warrants outstanding on the date hereof or amend, modify or waive any of the terms or rights set forth in, any warrant
or the warrant agreement relating thereto, including any amendment, modification or reduction of the warrant price set forth therein; or
|
•
|
except as contemplated by certain exceptions, prior to the Closing, (A) adopt or amend any Purchaser Plan (as defined in the
MIPA), enter into any employment contract or collective bargaining agreement or hire any employee.
|
•
|
MSP delivering to the Company certain financial information and audited and unaudited financial statements specified in the
MIPA;
|
•
|
MSP using commercially reasonable efforts to enter into the Employment and Restrictive Covenant Agreements with certain
employees prior to the Closing Date;
|
•
|
certain tax matters;
|
•
|
MSP using commercially reasonable efforts to obtain each third-party consent required in connection with the consummation of
Business Combination;
|
•
|
the parties using their reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be done, all
things reasonably necessary, proper or advisable or as another party may reasonably request to consummate and make effective as promptly as practicable the transactions contemplated by the MIPA (including the satisfaction, but not waiver,
of the closing conditions), (ii) execute and deliver, or cause to be executed and delivered, such other documents, certificates, agreements and other writings and take such other actions as may be reasonably necessary or desirable in
order to consummate or implement expeditiously each of the transactions contemplated by the MIPA, and (iii) obtain each material third-party consent and approval required to be obtained in order to consummate the Business Combination;
|
•
|
MSP, subject to certain limitation and restrictions, providing the Company, its legal counsel and other representatives
reasonable access, to the offices, properties and books and records and using commercially reasonable efforts to furnish to the Company, its legal counsel and other representatives such information relating to the business in the
possession of MSP as such persons may reasonably request, in each case solely for purposes of consummating the Business Combination;
|
•
|
the disbursement of monies from the Trust Account;
|
•
|
confidentiality and publicity relating to the MIPA and the transactions contemplated thereby;
|
•
|
Members’ Representative and the Members, on the one hand, and the Company and Opco, on the other hand, promptly notifying the
other party of certain events; and
|
•
|
each party, on the request of any other party, executing such further documents, and performing such further acts, as may be
reasonably necessary or appropriate to give full effect to the allocation of rights, benefits, obligations and liabilities contemplated by the MIPA.
|
•
|
company organization, good standing and power;
|
•
|
requisite authority to enter into the MIPA and to complete the contemplated transactions;
|
•
|
required governmental and regulatory consents necessary in connection with the Business Combination;
|
•
|
absence of conflicts with organizational documents, applicable laws or certain agreements and instruments as a result of
entering into the MIPA or consummating the Business Combination;
|
•
|
capitalization of MSP and valid issuance of all membership interests;
|
•
|
organizational documents;
|
•
|
control by and control of third parties;
|
•
|
assumed names;
|
•
|
contracts requiring consent as a result of entering into the MIPA or consummating the Business Combination;
|
•
|
financial information and absence of undisclosed liabilities;
|
•
|
accuracy, completeness and authenticity of the books and records;
|
•
|
absence of a Material Adverse Effect with respect to MSP since December 31, 2020 and absence of certain other changes with
respect to MSP;
|
•
|
title to assets of MSP;
|
•
|
title to CCRAs;
|
•
|
litigation;
|
•
|
material contracts;
|
•
|
insurance;
|
•
|
licenses and permits;
|
•
|
compliance with laws;
|
•
|
intellectual property;
|
•
|
privacy and data security;
|
•
|
employees;
|
•
|
employee benefits and compensation;
|
•
|
real property;
|
•
|
tax matters;
|
•
|
environmental laws;
|
•
|
HIPAA compliance;
|
•
|
healthcare law compliance;
|
•
|
healthcare laws proceedings;
|
•
|
broker’s and finder’s fees related to the Business Combination;
|
•
|
anti-corruption matters;
|
•
|
compliance with laundering statutes;
|
•
|
dealings with Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Treasury Department sanctioned countries;
|
•
|
non-investment company; and
|
•
|
lack of untrue statements of a material fact or omissions to state any material fact.
|
•
|
ownership of the membership interests of MSP and authority to execute the MIPA and consummate the Business Combination;
|
•
|
no consent, approval, waiver, authorization or novation or notice or filing required to be given or made by any Member in
connection with the execution of the MIPA and consummation of the Business Combination;
|
•
|
rights or interests of the Members in any person relating to MSP’s business;
|
•
|
absence of conflicts with organizational documents, applicable laws or certain agreements and instruments as a result of
entering into the MIPA or consummating the Business Combination;
|
•
|
litigation; and
|
•
|
each Member being an accredited investor.
|
•
|
company organization, good standing and power;
|
•
|
requisite authority to enter into the MIPA and to complete the contemplated transactions;
|
•
|
required governmental and regulatory consents necessary in connection with the Business Combination;
|
•
|
absence of conflicts with organizational documents, applicable laws or certain agreements and instruments as a result of
entering into the MIPA or consummating the Business Combination;
|
•
|
broker’s and finder’s fees related to the Business Combination;
|
•
|
due authorization and valid issuance of securities issued as consideration in the Business Combination;
|
•
|
capitalization of the Company and Opco and valid issuance of all securities;
|
•
|
the Investment Management Trust Agreement and the Trust Account;
|
•
|
employees and employee benefit plans;
|
•
|
lack of untrue statements of a material fact or omissions to state any material fact;
|
•
|
Nasdaq listing;
|
•
|
reporting company and registration of Class A Common Stock pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act;
|
•
|
no undisclosed liabilities;
|
•
|
proper filing of documents with the SEC, the accuracy of information contained in the documents filed with the SEC and SOX
certifications, and financial information;
|
•
|
absence of a Parent Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the MIPA) since December 31, 2020 and conduct of business;
|
•
|
Sponsor Agreement is in full force and effect;
|
•
|
related party transactions;
|
•
|
non-investment company;
|
•
|
investigations and access to information of MSP; and
|
•
|
no other representations and warranties.
|
•
|
there not being in force any law, judgment, injunction, decree or order of any court, arbitrator or other governmental
authority enjoining, restraining or prohibiting the consummation of the Closing;
|
•
|
the approval by the Company’s stockholders of the Business Combination Proposal, the Nasdaq Proposal, the Charter Approval
Proposal, the Director Election Proposal, and the Incentive Plan Proposal;
|
•
|
the shares of Class A Common Stock to be issued (i) pursuant to the Business Combination, (ii) upon conversion of the Class B
Units that are included in the Up-C Units, or (iii) upon exercise of the New Warrants, in each case, being approved for listing on Nasdaq;
|
•
|
the Company having net tangible assets of at least $5,000,001 upon the consummation of the Business Combination, after giving
effect to any Company stockholder redemptions;
|
•
|
the expiration or termination of any applicable waiting period (including any extension thereof) under the HSR Act (which
waiting period expired on December 30, 2021);
|
•
|
the registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part having become effective in accordance with the
provisions of the Securities Act, no stop order having been issued by the SEC which remains in effect with respect to the registration statement, and no proceeding seeking such a stop order having been threatened or initiated by the SEC
which remains pending; and
|
•
|
the cash and cash equivalents of MSP and Opco (after giving effect to any redemptions and the payment of transaction costs,
including deferred underwriting fees) as of the Effective Time plus all amounts in the Trust Account, not being less than $30.0 million (such condition, the “Minimum Cash Condition”), provided, however, that Messrs. Ruiz and Quesada have
agreed to loan (or cause to be loaned) to MSP up to the aggregate amount then-remaining in the Service Fee Account, and the Minimum Cash Condition will be deemed to be satisfied if that amount is so loaned, irrespective of the amount of
cash actually held by MSP and Opco.
|
•
|
each of MSP and the Members having performed in all material respects their respective obligations required to be performed
under the MIPA at or prior to the Closing Date;
|
•
|
the representations and warranties of MSP and the Members contained in the MIPA, disregarding all qualifications and exceptions
contained therein relating to materiality, being true, correct and complete at and as of the Closing Date, as if made at and as of such date (except to the extent expressly made as of an earlier date, in which case only as of such date),
except where the failure of such representations and warranties to be so true and correct, has not had, and would not have, a Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the MIPA);
|
•
|
MSP, the Members and the Members’ Representative, as applicable, having executed and delivered to the Company a copy of certain
ancillary agreements to which it is a party;
|
•
|
the Company having received a certificate signed by the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or other authorized
person of MSP stating that the conditions specified in Section 10.2(a) and Section 10.2(b) of the MIPA have been satisfied;
|
•
|
no Material Adverse Effect having occurred since the date of the MIPA; and
|
•
|
the Company having received the Tax Receivable Agreement duly executed by the Company, Opco and certain Members.
|
•
|
the Company and Opco having performed in all material respects their respective obligations under the MIPA required to be
performed at or prior to the Closing Date;
|
•
|
the representations and warranties of the Company and Opco contained in the MIPA, disregarding all qualifications and
exceptions contained therein relating to materiality, being true and correct at and as of the Closing Date, as if made at and as of such date (except to the extent expressly made as of an earlier date, in which case only as of such date),
except where the failure of such representations and warranties to be so true and correct, has not had, and would not have, a Parent Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the MIPA);
|
•
|
the Members’ Representative having received a certificate signed by an authorized officer of the Company stating that the
conditions specified in Section 10.3(a) and Section 10.3(b) of the MIPA have been satisfied;
|
•
|
the Company having delivered to the Members’ Representative (i) certified copies of the resolutions duly adopted by each of the
Company’s and Opco’s Boards of Directors authorizing the execution, delivery and performance of the MIPA; and (ii) written resignations, in forms satisfactory to the Members’ Representative, dated as of the Closing Date and effective as
of the Closing, executed by (A) all officers of the Company and Opco; and (B) all persons serving as directors of the Company and Opco immediately prior to the Closing who are not selected as directors in accordance with Section 9.8 of
the MIPA;
|
•
|
the Company and Opco having executed and delivered to the Members’ Representative a copy of certain ancillary agreements to
which each is a party;
|
•
|
no Parent Material Adverse Effect having occurred since the date of the MIPA;
|
•
|
the Board having been appointed as the board of directors of the Post-Combination Company;
|
•
|
each of the covenants of the Sponsor required under the Sponsor Agreement to be performed as of or prior to the Closing having
been performed in all material respects, and none of the Sponsors having threatened (orally or in writing) (i) that the Sponsor Agreement is not valid, binding and in full force and effect, (ii) that the Company is in breach of or default
under the Sponsor Agreement or (iii) to terminate the Sponsor Agreement; and
|
•
|
Opco having delivered the Tax Receivable Agreement, duly executed by the Company, Opco and certain Members.
|
•
|
financial institutions or financial services entities;
|
•
|
mutual funds;
|
•
|
qualified plans, such as 401(k) plans, individual retirement accounts, etc.;
|
•
|
broker-dealers in securities or currencies;
|
•
|
governments or agencies or instrumentalities thereof;
|
•
|
persons that directly, indirectly or constructively own 5% or more (by vote or value) of our shares;
|
•
|
persons that acquired our Class A Common Stock or Existing Warrants pursuant to an exercise of employee share options, in
connection with employee share incentive plans or otherwise as compensation in connection with services provided;
|
•
|
insurance companies;
|
•
|
persons that are subject to mark-to-market accounting rules;
|
•
|
persons holding Class A Common Stock or Existing Warrants as part of a “straddle,” constructive sale, hedge, conversion or
other integrated transaction or similar transaction;
|
•
|
U.S. holders (as defined below) whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar;
|
•
|
U.S. expatriates or former long-term residents of the United States;
|
•
|
regulated investment companies or real estate investment trusts;
|
•
|
persons subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Code;
|
•
|
partnerships (or entities or arrangements classified as partnerships or other pass-through entities for U.S. federal income tax
purposes) and any beneficial owners of such entities;
|
•
|
“passive foreign investment companies,” referred to as “PFICs,” or “controlled foreign corporations,” and corporations that
accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax; and
|
•
|
tax-exempt entities.
|
•
|
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
|
•
|
a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) organized in or under the laws of
the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
|
•
|
an estate, the income of which is includible in gross income for U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
|
•
|
a trust, if (i) a U.S. court can exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more “United States
persons” (within the meaning of Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code) have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) it has a valid election in effect under Treasury Regulations to be treated as a United States
person.
|
•
|
the gain is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business by the Non-U.S. holder within the U.S. (and, under
certain income tax treaties, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment or fixed base maintained by the Non-U.S. holder); or
|
•
|
we are or have been a “United States real property holding corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes at any time during
the shorter of the five-year period ending on the date of disposition or the period that the Non-U.S. holder held our Class A Common Stock, and, in the case where shares of our Class A Common Stock are regularly traded on an established
securities market, the Non-U.S. holder has owned, directly or constructively, more than 5% of our Class A Common Stock at any time within the shorter of the five-year period preceding the disposition or such Non-U.S. holder’s holding
period for the shares of our Class A Common Stock.
|
•
|
5,500,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share;
|
•
|
3,250,000,000 shares of Class V Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share; and
|
•
|
10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share.
|
•
|
in whole and not in part;
|
•
|
at a price of $0.01 per warrant;
|
•
|
upon not less than 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption to each warrant holder; and
|
•
|
if, and only if, the reported last reported sale price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share
for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period ending the third trading day prior to the date on which the Company sends the notice of redemption to each warrant holder.
|
•
|
prior to such time, the Board approved either the business combination or the transaction that resulted in the stockholder
becoming an interested stockholder;
|
•
|
upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested
stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock (as defined below) of the Post-Combination Company outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, excluding for purposes of determining the voting stock outstanding (but not the
outstanding voting stock owned by the interested stockholder) those shares owned by (i) persons who are directors and also officers and (ii) employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine
confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer;
|
•
|
at or subsequent to such time, the business combination is approved by the Board and authorized at an annual or special meeting
of stockholders, and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least 662∕3% of the outstanding voting stock of the Post-Combination Company that is not owned by the interested
stockholder; or
|
•
|
the stockholder became an interested stockholder inadvertently and (i) as soon as practicable divested itself of ownership of
sufficient shares so that the stockholder ceased to be an interested stockholder and (ii) was not, at any time within the three-year period immediately prior to a business combination between the Post-Combination Company and such
stockholder, an interested stockholder but for the inadvertent acquisition of ownership.
|
•
|
No Cumulative Voting. The DGCL provides that
stockholders are not entitled to the right to cumulate votes in the election of directors unless a corporation’s certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. The Proposed Charter will not provide for cumulative voting.
|
•
|
Classified Board. The Proposed Charter and the Amended and Restated Bylaws will
provide that the Board (other than those directors, if any, elected by the holders of any outstanding series of Preferred Stock) is divided into three classes of directors. For more information on the classified board, see the section
entitled “Management of the Post-Combination Company.” The existence of a classified board of directors could discourage a third-party from making a tender
offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of the Post-Combination Company as the classification of the Board makes it more time consuming for stockholders to replace a majority of the directors.
|
•
|
Director Removal. The Proposed Charter will provide that, any director or the entire
Board may be removed (i) at any time prior to the date on which the voting power of John H. Ruiz and his affiliates (the “Founder Holder”) represent less than 50% of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares of the
Post-Combination Company generally entitled to vote (the “Voting Rights Threshold Date”) by a simple majority voting together as a single class, with or without cause, notwithstanding the classification of the Board, and (ii) at any time
from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date, solely for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 662∕3% of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares
of the Post-Combination Company generally entitled to vote thereon, voting together as a single class.
|
•
|
Board of Director Vacancies. The Proposed Charter will provide that, with respect to
directors elected by the stockholders generally entitled to vote, (i) newly created directorships resulting from an increase in the authorized number of directors or any vacancies on the Board resulting from death, resignation,
disqualification, removal or other cause will be filled solely and exclusively by a majority of the directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, or by the sole remaining director, and (ii) any director so elected will hold office
until the expiration of the term of office of the director whom he or she has replaced and until his or her successor is elected and qualified, subject to such director’s earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal, which
prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on the Board.
|
•
|
Action by Written Consent. The Proposed Charter will provide that, from and after the
Voting Rights Threshold Date, stockholder action can be taken only at an annual or special meeting of stockholders and cannot be taken by consent in lieu of a meeting.
|
•
|
Supermajority Requirements for Certain Amendments of the Proposed Charter and Amendments of
the Amended and Restated Bylaws. The DGCL generally provides that the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total voting power of the shares entitled to vote is required to amend a corporation’s certificate of
incorporation, unless the corporation’s certificate of incorporation requires a greater percentage. The Proposed Charter and the Amended and Restated Bylaws provide that, from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date, the affirmative
vote of the holders of at least 662∕3% in voting power of the then outstanding shares of the Post-Combination Company generally entitled to vote, voting together as a single class, will be
required to amend, alter, change or repeal the Amended and Restated Bylaws and certain provisions of the Proposed Charter, including those related to management of the Post-Combination Company and actions by written consent. Such
requirement for a super-majority vote to approve certain amendments to the Proposed Charter and amendments to the Amended and Restated Bylaws could enable a minority of stockholders of the Post-Combination Company to exercise veto power
over such amendments.
|
•
|
Issuance of Common Stock and Undesignated Preferred Stock. The Board will have the
authority, without further action by the stockholders, to issue (i) authorized but unissued shares of common stock and (ii) up to 10,000,000 shares of undesignated Preferred Stock, in the case of a series of Preferred Stock, with rights
and preferences, including voting rights, designated from time to time by the Board. The existence of authorized but unissued shares of common stock and Preferred Stock will enable the Board to render more difficult or to discourage an
attempt to obtain control of the Post-Combination Company by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest, or other means.
|
•
|
Notice Requirements for Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations. The Amended
and Restated Bylaws will provide advance notice procedures for stockholders seeking to bring business before the annual meeting of stockholders or to nominate candidates for election as directors at the annual meeting of stockholders. The
Amended and Restated Bylaws will also specify certain requirements regarding the form and content of a stockholder’s notice. These provisions might make it more difficult for stockholders to bring matters before the annual meeting.
|
•
|
Exclusive Forum. The Proposed Charter will provide that, unless the Post-Combination
Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery lacks jurisdiction, a state court located within the State of Delaware or the federal
district court for the District of Delaware) will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for any (i) derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Post-Combination Company, (ii) action
asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer, or employee of the Post-Combination Company to the Post-Combination Company or the Post-Combination Company’s stockholders, (iii) action asserting a claim
arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, the Proposed Charter or the Amended and Restated Bylaws, or (iv) action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine of the State of Delaware. The federal district courts of
the United States of America shall be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any action asserting a claim arising under the Securities Act, or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. The Proposed Charter will not
preclude or contract the scope of exclusive federal jurisdiction for suits brought under the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. If a stockholder nevertheless seeks to bring a claim (the nature of which is
covered by the exclusive forum provisions of the Proposed Charter) in a venue other than those designated in such provisions, we would expect to vigorously assert the validity and enforceability of the exclusive forum provisions of the
Proposed Charter. This may require significant additional costs associated with challenging venue in such other jurisdictions and there can be no assurance that the exclusive forum provisions of the Proposed Charter will be enforced by a
court in those other jurisdictions.
|
•
|
Amendments. The Proposed Charter will provide that both the Proposed Charter and the
Amended and Restated Bylaws may be amended at any time (i) prior to the Voting Rights Threshold Date, by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority in voting power of the then outstanding shares of the Company generally
entitled to vote, voting together as a single class, and (ii) from and after the Voting Rights Threshold Date, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 662∕3% in voting power of the
then outstanding shares of stock of the Company generally entitled to vote, voting together as a single class.
|
•
|
the issuer of the securities that was formerly a shell company has ceased to be a shell company;
|
•
|
the issuer of the securities is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
|
•
|
the issuer of the securities has filed all Exchange Act reports and material required to be filed, as applicable, during the
preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports and materials), other than Form 8-K reports; and
|
•
|
at least one year has elapsed from the time that the issuer filed current Form 10 type information with the SEC reflecting its
status as an entity that is not a shell company.
|
•
|
1% of the total number of shares of common stock or warrants, as applicable, then outstanding; or
|
•
|
the average weekly reported trading volume of the common stock or warrants, as applicable, during the four calendar weeks
preceding the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to the sale.
|
|
| |
Page
|
| | ||
Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
| |
|
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| |
|
| |
Page
|
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| |
| | ||
Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
| |
|
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| |
|
| |
December 31,
2021
|
| |
December 31,
2020
|
ASSETS
|
| |
|
| |
|
Current assets
|
| |
|
| |
|
Cash
|
| | $ |
| | $ |
Prepaid expenses
|
| |
|
| |
|
Total Current Assets
|
| |
|
| |
|
Marketable securities held in Trust Account
|
| |
|
| |
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
| |
$
|
| |
$
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
| |
|
| |
|
Current liabilities
|
| |
|
| |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
| | $ |
| | $ |
Accrued offering costs
|
| |
|
| |
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
| |
|
| |
|
Warrant liability
|
| |
|
| |
|
Deferred underwriting fee payable
|
| |
|
| |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6)
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Class A common stock subject to possible redemption,
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Stockholders’ Deficit
|
| |
|
| |
|
Preferred stock, $
|
| |
|
| |
|
Class A common stock, $
|
| |
|
| |
|
Class B common stock, $
|
| |
|
| |
|
Accumulated deficit
|
| |
(
|
| |
(
|
Total Stockholders’ Deficit
|
| |
(
|
| |
(
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
| |
$
|
| |
$
|
|
| |
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
|
| |
Year Ended
December 31,
2020
|
Operating and formation costs
|
| | $ |
| |
$
|
Loss from operations
|
| |
(
|
| |
(
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Other income (expense):
|
| |
|
| |
|
Interest earned on marketable securities held in Trust Account
|
| |
|
| |
|
Transactions costs associated with the Initial Public Offering
|
| |
|
| |
(
|
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities
|
| |
|
| |
|
Other income (expense), net
|
| |
|
| |
(
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Net income (loss)
|
| | $ |
| |
$(
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding, Class A Common stock
|
| |
|
| |
|
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share, Class A
Common stock
|
| | $ |
| | $( |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding, Class B Common Stock
|
| |
|
| |
|
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share, Class B
Common Stock
|
| | $ |
| | $( |
|
| |
Class A
Common Stock
|
| |
Class B
Common Stock
|
| |
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
| |
Accumulated
Deficit
|
| |
Total
Stockholders’
Deficit
|
||||||
|
| |
Shares
|
| |
Amount
|
| |
Shares
|
| |
Amount
|
| ||||||||
Balance – January 1, 2020
|
| |
|
| |
$
|
| |
|
| |
$
|
| | $ |
| | $( |
| | $( |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Issuance of Class B common stock to Sponsor
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Sale of
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Accretion to common stock subject to redemption amount
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
(
|
| |
(
|
| |
(
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Net loss
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(
|
| |
(
|
Balance – December 31, 2020
|
| |
|
| |
$
|
| |
|
| |
$
|
| | $ |
| |
$(
|
| |
$(
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Net income
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
—
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Balance – December 31, 2021
|
| |
|
| |
$
|
| |
|
| |
$
|
| | $ |
| |
$(
|
| | $( |
|
| |
Year Ended
December 31,
2021
|
| |
Year Ended
December 31,
2020
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Net income (loss)
|
| | $ |
| | $( |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
used in operating activities:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Change in fair value of warrant liability
|
| |
(
|
| |
(
|
Transaction costs associated with the Initial Public Offering
|
| |
|
| |
|
Interest earned on marketable securities held in Trust Account
|
| |
(
|
| |
(
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Prepaid expenses
|
| |
|
| |
(
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
| |
|
| |
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
| |
(
|
| |
(
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Investment of cash into Trust Account
|
| |
|
| |
(
|
Cash withdrawn from Trust Account to pay franchise and income taxes
|
| |
|
| |
—
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
| |
|
| |
(
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Proceeds from issuance of Class B common stock to Sponsor
|
| |
|
| |
|
Proceeds from sale of Units, net of underwriting discounts paid
|
| |
|
| |
|
Proceeds from sale of Private Placement Units
|
| |
|
| |
|
Proceeds from promissory notes – related party
|
| |
|
| |
|
Repayment of promissory notes – related party
|
| |
|
| |
(
|
Payment of offering costs
|
| |
(
|
| |
(
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
| |
(
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Net Change in Cash
|
| |
(
|
| |
|
Cash – Beginning
|
| |
|
| |
|
Cash – Ending
|
| | $ |
| | $ |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Initial classification of common stock subject to redemption
|
| | $ |
| | $ |
Deferred underwriting fee payable
|
| | $ |
| | $ |
Offering costs included in accrued offering costs
|
| | $ |
| | $ |
Gross proceeds
|
| |
$
|
Less:
|
| |
|
Proceeds allocated to Public Warrants
|
| |
$(
|
Class A common stock issuance costs
|
| |
$(
|
Plus:
|
| |
|
Accretion of carrying value to redemption value
|
| |
$
|
Class A common stock subject to possible redemption
|
| |
$
|
|
| |
Year Ended
December 31, 2021
|
| |
Year Ended
December 31, 2020
|
||||||
|
| |
Class A
|
| |
Class B
|
| |
Class A
|
| |
Class B
|
Basic and diluted net income (loss)
per common stock
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Numerator:
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Allocation of net income (loss), as adjusted
|
| | $ |
| |
$
|
| |
$(
|
| |
$(
|
Denominator:
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common stock
|
| | $ |
| | $ |
| |
$(
|
| |
$(
|
•
|
in whole and not in part;
|
•
|
at a price of $
|
•
|
upon not less than
|
•
|
if, and only if, the reported last reported sale price of the Company’s Class A common stock equals or exceeds $
|
|
| |
December 31,
2021
|
| |
December 31,
2020
|
Deferred tax assets (liability)
|
| |
|
| |
|
Net operating loss carryforward
|
| |
$
|
| |
$
|
Unrealized loss on securities
|
| |
|
| |
|
Start-up Costs
|
| |
|
| |
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
| |
|
| |
|
Valuation Allowance
|
| |
(
|
| |
(
|
Deferred tax assets (liability)
|
| |
$
|
| |
$
|
|
| |
December 31,
2021
|
| |
December 31,
2020
|
Federal
|
| |
|
| |
|
Current
|
| |
$
|
| |
$
|
Deferred (current and non-current deferred)
|
| |
(
|
| |
(
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
State and Local
|
| |
|
| |
|
Current
|
| |
|
| |
|
Deferred
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
| |
|
| |
|
Income tax provision
|
| |
$
|
| |
$
|
|
| |
December 31,
2021
|
| |
December 31,
2020
|
Statutory federal income tax rate
|
| |
|
| |
|
Transaction costs allocable to warrant liabilities
|
| |
|
| |
(
|
Other
|
| |
|
| |
|
Business combination expenses
|
| |
|
| |
|
Change in fair value of warrant liability
|
| |
(
|
| |
|
Valuation allowance
|
| |
|
| |
(
|
Income tax provision
|
| |
|
| |
|
Level 1:
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An active market for an asset or liability
is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
|
Level 2:
|
Observable inputs other than Level 1 inputs. Examples of Level 2 inputs include quoted prices in active markets
for similar assets or liabilities and quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
|
Level 3:
|
Unobservable inputs based on our assessment of the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the
asset or liability.
|
Description
|
| |
Level
|
| |
December 31,
2021
|
| |
December 31,
2020
|
Assets:
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Marketable securities held in Trust Account
|
| |
1
|
| |
$
|
| |
$
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Liabilities
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Warrant Liability – Public Warrants
|
| |
1
|
| |
|
| |
|
Warrant Liability – Private Warrants
|
| |
3
|
| |
|
| |
|
Input
|
| |
December 31,
2021
|
| |
December 31,
2020
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
| |
|
| |
|
Trading days per year
|
| |
|
| |
|
Expected volatility
|
| |
|
| |
|
Exercise price
|
| |
$
|
| |
$
|
Stock Price
|
| |
$
|
| |
$
|
|
| |
Private
Placement
|
| |
Public
|
| |
Warrant liabilities
|
Initial measurement on August 18, 2020 and
over-allotment on August 20, 2020
|
| |
$
|
| |
$
|
| |
$
|
Change in fair value
|
| |
(
|
| |
(
|
| |
(
|
December 31, 2020
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Change in fair value
|
| |
(
|
| |
(
|
| |
(
|
Fair value as of December 31, 2021
|
| |
$
|
| |
$
|
| |
$
|
|
| |
Page
|
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
| |
|
| |
December 31,
|
| |
December 31,
|
(In thousands)
|
| |
2021
|
| |
2020
|
ASSETS
|
| |
|
| |
|
Current assets:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
| |
$1,664
|
| |
$11,879
|
Affiliate receivable(1)
|
| |
4,070
|
| |
4,871
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
| |
13,304
|
| |
54
|
Total current assets
|
| |
19,038
|
| |
16,804
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
| |
750
|
| |
612
|
Intangible assets, net
|
| |
84,218
|
| |
427
|
Total assets
|
| |
$104,006
|
| |
$17,843
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
| |
|
| |
|
Current liabilities:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Accounts payable
|
| |
$4,609
|
| |
$398
|
Affiliate payable(1)
|
| |
45,252
|
| |
39,027
|
Obligation to provide securities
|
| |
—
|
| |
1,577
|
Commission payable
|
| |
465
|
| |
448
|
Deferred service fee income
|
| |
249
|
| |
249
|
Other current liabilities
|
| |
3,489
|
| |
426
|
Total current liabilities
|
| |
54,064
|
| |
42,125
|
Claims financing obligation & notes payable(1)
|
| |
106,805
|
| |
24,043
|
Interest payable
|
| |
94,545
|
| |
67,522
|
Total liabilities
|
| |
$255,414
|
| |
$133,690
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
|
| |
|
| |
|
Equity:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Members’ deficit
|
| |
$(155,756)
|
| |
$(120,179)
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
| |
4,348
|
| |
4,332
|
Total equity
|
| |
(151,408)
|
| |
(115,847)
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
| |
$104,006
|
| |
$17,843
|
(1)
|
As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the total affiliate receivable and affiliate payable balances are with related
parties. In addition, the claims financings obligation & notes payable includes balances with related parties. See Note 11, Related Party, for further details.
|
|
| |
For the year
ended December 31,
|
|||
(In
thousands)
|
| |
2021
|
| |
2020
|
Claims recovery income
|
| |
$126
|
| |
$255
|
Claims recovery service income(1)
|
| |
14,500
|
| |
13,632
|
Total Claims Recovery
|
| |
$14,626
|
| |
$13,887
|
Operating expenses
|
| |
|
| |
|
Cost of claim recoveries
|
| |
190
|
| |
172
|
General and administrative(2)
|
| |
12,761
|
| |
14,598
|
Professional fees
|
| |
8,502
|
| |
2,211
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
| |
343
|
| |
235
|
Total operating expenses
|
| |
21,796
|
| |
17,216
|
Operating Loss
|
| |
$(7,170)
|
| |
$(3,329)
|
Interest expense
|
| |
(27,046)
|
| |
(20,886)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
| |
1,139
|
| |
(51)
|
Net loss
|
| |
$(33,077)
|
| |
$(24,266)
|
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling members
|
| |
(16)
|
| |
18
|
Net loss attributable to controlling members
|
| |
$(33,093)
|
| |
$(24,248)
|
(1)
|
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, claims recovery service income included $11.5 million and $13.1 million,
respectively, of claims recovery service income from VRM MSP Recovery Partners LLC (“VRM”). See Note 11, Related Party, for further details.
|
(2)
|
For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, general and administrative expenses included $111 thousand and $773 thousand,
respectively, of related party expenses. This includes legal expenses to the La Ley con John H. Ruiz P.A., d/b/a MSP Recovery Law Firm (the “Law Firm”) of $26 thousand and $– thousand, respectively. See Note 11, Related Party, for further details.
|
(In
thousands)
|
| |
Members’ Deficit
|
| |
Non- Controlling
Interests
|
| |
Total Equity
|
Balance at December 31, 2020
|
| |
$(120,179)
|
| |
$4,332
|
| |
$(115,847)
|
Contributions
|
| |
227
|
| |
—
|
| |
227
|
Distributions
|
| |
(2,711)
|
| |
—
|
| |
(2,711)
|
Net income (loss)
|
| |
(33,093)
|
| |
16
|
| |
(33,077)
|
Balance at December 31, 2021
|
| |
$(155,756)
|
| |
$4,348
|
| |
$(151,408)
|
(In
thousands)
|
| |
Members’ Deficit
|
| |
Non- Controlling
Interests
|
| |
Total Equity
|
Balance at December 31, 2019
|
| |
$(104,455)
|
| |
$4,350
|
| |
$(100,105)
|
Contributions
|
| |
8,524
|
| |
—
|
| |
8,524
|
Net income (loss)
|
| |
(24,248)
|
| |
(18)
|
| |
(24,266)
|
Balance at December 31, 2020
|
| |
$(120,179)
|
| |
$4,332
|
| |
$(115,847)
|
|
| |
For the year
ended December 31,
|
|||
(In
thousands)
|
| |
2021
|
| |
2020
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Net loss(1)
|
| |
$(33,077)
|
| |
$(24,266)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
| |
343
|
| |
235
|
Amortization included in cost of claim recoveries
|
| |
164
|
| |
125
|
Paid in kind interest
|
| |
27,023
|
| |
20,843
|
PPP loan forgiveness
|
| |
(1,043)
|
| |
(44)
|
Realized gain on equity securities
|
| |
(201)
|
| |
(18)
|
Unrealized losses on investments – short position
|
| |
—
|
| |
279
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Affiliate receivable(1)
|
| |
801
|
| |
(3,346)
|
Affiliate payable(1)
|
| |
6,225
|
| |
5,670
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
| |
1
|
| |
(9)
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
| |
2,013
|
| |
268
|
Deferred service fee income
|
| |
—
|
| |
249
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
| |
2,249
|
| |
(14)
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Additions to property, plant, and equipment
|
| |
(481)
|
| |
(330)
|
Additions to intangible assets
|
| |
(150)
|
| |
—
|
Proceeds from sale of short positions
|
| |
—
|
| |
1,298
|
Purchases of equity securities
|
| |
(4,056)
|
| |
(1,255)
|
Proceeds from sale of equity securities
|
| |
4,450
|
| |
1,273
|
Purchase of securities to cover short position
|
| |
(1,770)
|
| |
—
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
| |
(2,007)
|
| |
986
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Contributions from members
|
| |
227
|
| |
8,524
|
Distributions to members
|
| |
(2,711)
|
| |
—
|
Proceeds from debt financing
|
| |
—
|
| |
1,086
|
Additions to deferred transaction costs
|
| |
(7,973)
|
| |
—
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
| |
(10,457)
|
| |
9,610
|
(Decrease) Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
| |
(10,215)
|
| |
10,582
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
| |
11,879
|
| |
1,297
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
| |
$1,664
|
| |
$11,879
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
activities:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Purchase of intangible asset financed by note payable
|
| |
$83,805
|
| |
$—
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Interest
|
| |
$23
|
| |
$43
|
(1)
|
Balances include related party transactions. See Note 11, Related Party, for further
details.
|
Entity Name
|
| |
Method
|
MSP Recovery of Puerto Rico LLC (Puerto Rico)
|
| |
Combined
|
MDA Series, LLC
|
| |
Combined
|
MSP Recovery, LLC
|
| |
Combined
|
MAO-MSO Recovery LLC Series FHCP
|
| |
Consolidated (non-wholly owned)
|
MSP Recovery Services, LLC
|
| |
Combined
|
MSPA Claims 1, LLC
|
| |
Consolidated (wholly owned)
|
MSP National, LLC
|
| |
Consolidated (wholly owned)
|
MSP Recovery Claims Prov Series LLC
|
| |
Combined
|
MSP Recovery Claims CAID Series LLC
|
| |
Combined
|
MSP WB LLC
|
| |
Combined
|
MSP Recovery Claims HOSP Series LLC
|
| |
Combined
|
MSP Productions, LLC
|
| |
Combined
|
MSP Recovery Claims HP, Series LLC
|
| |
Combined
|
MSP Recovery Claims COM, Series LLC
|
| |
Combined
|
Office and Computer Equipment
|
| |
3 years
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
| |
3 years
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
| |
Lesser of lease term or estimated life
|
•
|
Exemption to not disclose the unfulfilled performance obligation balance for contracts with an original length of one year or
less.
|
•
|
Practical expedient to recognize the incremental costs of obtaining a contract as an expense when incurred if the amortization
period of the asset that the entity otherwise would have recognized is one year or less.
|
•
|
Election to present revenue net of sales taxes and other similar taxes, if any.
|
•
|
Practical expedient not requiring the entity to adjust the promised amount of consideration for the effects of a significant
financing component if the entity expects, at contract inception, that the period between when the entity transfers a promised good or service to a customer and when the customer pays for that good or service will be one year or less.
|
Series PMPI
|
| |
Revenue
|
| |
Amortization
|
| |
Other expenses
|
| |
Profit (Loss)
|
For the year ended December 31, 2021
|
| |
$1
|
| |
$2,000
|
| |
$—
|
| |
$(1,999)
|
For the year ended December 31, 2020
|
| |
$34
|
| |
$2,000
|
| |
$20
|
| |
$(1,986)
|
Series PMPI
|
| |
Total Assets
|
| |
Total Liabilities
|
As of December 31, 2021
|
| |
$5,390
|
| |
$266
|
As of December 31, 2020
|
| |
$7,393
|
| |
$270
|
|
| |
December 31,
|
|||
|
| |
2021
|
| |
2020
|
Office and computer equipment
|
| |
$356
|
| |
$305
|
Leasehold improvements
|
| |
113
|
| |
113
|
Internally developed software
|
| |
1,020
|
| |
589
|
Other software
|
| |
66
|
| |
67
|
Property, plant and equipment, gross
|
| |
$1,555
|
| |
$1,074
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization of software
|
| |
(805)
|
| |
(462)
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
| |
$750
|
| |
$612
|
|
| |
December 31,
2021
|
|
| |
CCRAs
|
Gross
|
| |
$84,955
|
Accumulated amortization
|
| |
(737)
|
Net
|
| |
$84,218
|
|
| |
December 31,
2020
|
|
| |
CCRAs
|
Gross
|
| |
$1,000
|
Accumulated amortization
|
| |
(573)
|
Net
|
| |
$427
|
2022
|
| |
10,620
|
2023
|
| |
10,620
|
2024
|
| |
10,547
|
2025
|
| |
10,495
|
2026
|
| |
10,495
|
Thereafter
|
| |
331,441
|
Total
|
| |
$84,218
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
| |
Lease Payments
|
2022
|
| |
$231
|
2023(1)
|
| |
217
|
Total
|
| |
$448
|
(1)
|
Operating lease expires before or during the year ending December 31, 2023
|
|
| |
|
| |
Page
|
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | |
|
| |
|
| |
Page
|
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | |
|
| |
|
| |
Page
|
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | |
|
| |
|
| |
Page
|
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | |
Exhibit A
|
| |
Form of SPAC Charter
|
Exhibit B
|
| |
Form of SPAC Bylaws
|
Exhibit C
|
| |
Form of Purchaser A&R LLCA
|
Exhibit D
|
| |
Form of Registration Rights Agreement
|
Exhibit E
|
| |
Form of Tax Receivable Agreement
|
Exhibit F
|
| |
A&R Sponsor Agreement
|
Exhibit G
|
| |
Form of Employment and Restrictive Covenant Agreement
|
Exhibit H
|
| |
Form of Escrow Agreement
|
Exhibit I
|
| |
Form of Equity Incentive Plan
|
Exhibit J
|
| |
Form of Lock-Up Agreement
|
Exhibit K
|
| |
Form of Legal Services Agreement
|
Exhibit L
|
| |
Form of New Warrant Agreement
|
Exhibit M
|
| |
Form of Side Letter Agreement
|
Exhibit N
|
| |
Form of Virage Side Letter Agreement
|
|
| |
if to Parent or Purchaser, to:
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
4218 NE 2nd Avenue
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Miami, Florida 33137
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Attn:
|
| |
Ophir Sternberg
|
|
| |
|
| |
Email:
|
| |
o@lheartcapital.com
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
DLA Piper LLP (US)
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
2525 East Camelback Road
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Esplanade II Suite 1000
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Phoenix, AZ 85016-4232
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Attn:
|
| |
Steven D. Pidgeon
|
|
| |
|
| |
Email:
|
| |
steven.pidgeon@us.dlapiper.com
|
|
| |
if to the MSP Companies:
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2701 Le Jeune Road, Floor 10
|
|
| |
|
| |
Coral Gables, Florida 33134
|
|
| |
|
| |
Attn: General Counsel
|
|
| |
|
| |
Email: generalcounsel@msprecovery.com
|
|
| |
with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
767 Fifth Avenue
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
New York, NY 10153
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Attn:
|
| |
Michael J. Aiello
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Matthew Gilroy
|
|
| |
|
| |
Email:
|
| |
michael.aiello@weil.com
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
matthew.gilroy@weil.com
|
|
| |
if to the Members’ Representative:
|
| ||||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
2701 Le Jeune Road, Floor 10
|
| |||||
|
| |
|
| |
Coral Gables, Florida 33134
|
| |||||
|
| |
|
| |
Attn:
|
| |
General Counsel
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
Email:
|
| |
generalcounsel@msprecovery.com
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):
|
| ||||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
|
| |||||
|
| |
|
| |
767 Fifth Avenue
|
| |||||
|
| |
|
| |
New York, NY 10153
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Attn:
|
| |
Michael J. Aiello
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Matthew Gilroy
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
Email:
|
| |
michael.aiello@weil.com
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
matthew.gilroy@weil.com
|
|
|
| |
Parent:
|
|||
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
LIONHEART ACQUISITION CORPORATION II
|
|||
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Ophir Sternberg
|
|
| |
|
| |
Ophir Sternberg, Chairman and CEO
|
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
Purchaser:
|
|||
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
LIONHEART II HOLDINGS, LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Ophir Sternberg
|
|
| |
|
| |
Lionheart Acquisition Corporation II, the sole member
|
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
By: Ophir Sternberg, Chairman and CEO
|
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
The Members’ Representative (solely in such capacity and not
in any personal capacity):
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
The MSP Purchased Companies:
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MDA, SERIES LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name:John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:Manager
|
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
SERIES MRCS
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY SERVICES LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Sandra Rodriguez
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Sandra Rodriguez
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY, LLC
|
|||
|
| |||||
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Sandra Rodriguez
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Sandra Rodriguez
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY CAID, SERIES LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY COM, SERIES LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY HOSP, SERIES LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY PROV, SERIES LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY OF PUERTO RICO, LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Sandra Rodriguez
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Sandra Rodriguez
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS HP, SERIES LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
MSP WB, LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
MSP PRODUCTIONS, LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
Members:
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
Name: John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
/s/ Frank Quesada
|
|
| |
Name: Frank Quesada
|
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz, II
|
|
| |
Name: John H. Ruiz, II
|
|
| |
JOCRAL FAMILY LLLP
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
John H. Ruiz Revocable Living Trust, General Partner
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Trustee
|
|
| |
JOCRAL HOLDINGS, LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Roberto Lizama
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Roberto Lizama
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
QUESADA GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
RUIZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
Parent:
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
LIONHEART ACQUISITION CORPORATION II
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Ophir Sternberg
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Ophir Sternberg, Chairman and CEO
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Purchaser:
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
LIONHEART II HOLDINGS, LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Ophir Sternberg
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Lionheart Acquisition Corporation II, the sole member
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
By:
|
| |
Ophir Sternberg, Chairman and CEO
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The Members’ Representative (solely in such capacity and not
in any personal capacity):
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The Members’ Representative (as attorney-in-fact pursuant to
Section 14.14(a) of the Agreement on behalf of each Member):
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
The MSP Purchased Companies:
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MDA, SERIES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
SERIES MRCS
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY SERVICES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Sandra Rodriguez
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Sandra Rodriguez
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY, LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Sandra Rodriguez
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Sandra Rodriguez
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS PROV, SERIES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS CAID, SERIES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS HOSP, SERIES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY OF PUERTO RICO, LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Sandra Rodriguez
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Sandra Rodriguez
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Roberto Lizama
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Roberto Lizama
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP WB, LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS COM, SERIES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS HP, SERIES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP PRODUCTIONS, LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
a.
|
Schedule 2.1(c) of the Disclosure Schedules is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the disclosure that is
attached hereto as Annex A-1.
|
b.
|
Schedule 1.179 of the Disclosure Schedules is hereby added with the disclosure that is attached hereto as Annex A-2.
|
|
| |
Parent:
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
LIONHEART ACQUISITION CORPORATION II
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Ophir Sternberg
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Ophir Sternberg, Chairman and CEO
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Purchaser:
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
LIONHEART II HOLDINGS, LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Ophir Sternberg
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Lionheart Acquisition Corporation II, the sole member
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
By:
|
| |
Ophir Sternberg, Chairman and CEO
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The Members’ Representative (solely in such capacity and not
in any personal capacity):
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The Members’ Representative (as attorney-in-fact pursuant to
Section 14.14(a) of the Agreement on behalf of each Member):
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
The MSP Purchased Companies:
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MDA, SERIES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY SERVICES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Sandra Rodriguez
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Sandra Rodriguez
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY, LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Sandra Rodriguez
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Sandra Rodriguez
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS PROV, SERIES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS CAID, SERIES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS HOSP, SERIES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY OF PUERTO RICO, LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Sandra Rodriguez
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Sandra Rodriguez
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Roberto Lizama
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Roberto Lizama
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP WB, LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS COM, SERIES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS HP, SERIES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP PRODUCTIONS, LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
Parent:
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
LIONHEART ACQUISITION CORPORATION II
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Ophir Sternberg
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Ophir Sternberg, Chairman and CEO
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Purchaser:
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
LIONHEART II HOLDINGS, LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Ophir Sternberg
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Lionheart Acquisition Corporation II, the sole member
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
By:
|
| |
Ophir Sternberg, Chairman and CEO
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The Members’ Representative (solely in such capacity and not
in any personal capacity):
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The Members’ Representative (as attorney-in-fact pursuant to
Section 14.14(a) of the Agreement on behalf of each Member):
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
The MSP Purchased Companies:
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MDA, SERIES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
SERIES MRCS
|
||||||
|
| |
|
||||||
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
||||||
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY SERVICES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Sandra Rodriguez
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Sandra Rodriguez
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY, LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Sandra Rodriguez
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Sandra Rodriguez
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS PROV, SERIES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS CAID, SERIES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS HOSP, SERIES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY OF PUERTO RICO, LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Sandra Rodriguez
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Sandra Rodriguez
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Roberto Lizama
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Roberto Lizama
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP WB, LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS COM, SERIES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
||||||
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS HP, SERIES LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Frank C. Quesada
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP PRODUCTIONS, LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY, INC.
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
Name: [•]
|
|||
|
| |
Office: [•]
|
|
| |
|
| |
Page
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Page
|
| | |||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | |
|
| |
|
| |
Page
|
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | |
|
| |
|
| |
Page
|
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | |||||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | | |||
| | | |
Exhibit A
|
| |
Form of Joinder Agreement
|
Exhibit B
|
| |
Certificate For Lionheart II Holdings, LLC
|
Exhibit C
|
| |
Officers
|
Exhibit D
|
| |
Notice of Exchange
|
Exhibit E
|
| |
Schedule of Members
|
Exhibit F
|
| |
Notice of Repurchase
|
|
| |
Lionheart II Holdings, LLC
|
|
| |
[2701 Le Jeune Road
|
|
| |
Floor 10
|
|
| |
Coral Gables, Florida 33134]
|
|
| |
Attention: General Counsel
|
|
| |
E-mail: [•]
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
with a copy (which copy shall not constitute notice) to:
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
|
|
| |
767 Fifth Avenue
|
|
| |
New York, New York 10153
|
|
| |
Attention: Michael J. Aiello
|
|
| |
Matthew Gilroy
|
|
| |
E-mail: michael.aiello@weil.com
|
|
| |
matthew.gilroy@weil.com
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY, INC.,
as a Member and the
Corporation
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: [•]
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: [•]
|
|
| |
[MEMBERS]
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: [•]
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: [•]
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP Principals
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Frank Quesada
|
1.
|
Joinder to the LLC Agreement. Upon the execution of this Joinder by the undersigned and delivery hereof to the Company, the
undersigned hereby is and hereafter will be a Member under the LLC Agreement and a party thereto, with all the rights, privileges and responsibilities of a Member thereunder. The undersigned hereby agrees that it shall comply with and be
fully bound by the terms of the LLC Agreement as if it had been a signatory thereto as of the date thereof.
|
2.
|
Incorporation by Reference. All terms and conditions of the LLC Agreement are hereby incorporated by reference in this Joinder
as if set forth herein in full.
|
3.
|
Address. All notices under the LLC Agreement to the undersigned shall be directed to:
|
|
| |
[NEW MEMBER]
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: [•]
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: [•]
|
LIONHEART II HOLDINGS, LLC
|
| |||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
By:
|
| |
MSP Recovery, Inc.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Its manager
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
By:
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Name: [•]
|
| |
|
|
| |
Title: [•]
|
| |
|
Dated: , 20
|
| |
|
|
| |
Name:
|
|
| |
Title:
|
|
| |
Signature:
|
|
| |
|
Dated: , 20
|
| |
|
|
| |
(Transferor)
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Address:
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
[HOLDER]
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
[•]
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
[•]
|
|
| |
|
| |
Address:
|
| |
[•]
|
|
Name and Address of Member
|
| |
Class A
Units
|
| |
Class B
Units
|
| |
Capital
Account
|
|
|
MSP Recovery, Inc.
[2701 Le Jeune Road, Floor 10,
Coral Gables, Florida 33134]
|
| |
[•]
|
| |
0
|
| |
$[•]
|
|
|
[Members]
[Addresses of Members]
|
| |
0
|
| |
[•]
|
| |
$[•]
|
|
|
Total:
|
| |
[•]
|
| |
[•]
|
| |
$[•]
|
|
|
Name and Address of MSP Principal
|
| |
MSP
Principal
Proportion
|
|
|
[MSP Principal]
[Addresses of MSP Principal]
|
| |
[•]
|
|
|
[MSP Principal]
[Addresses of MSP Principal]
|
| |
[•]
|
|
|
Total:
|
| |
100
|
|
a.
|
Each MSP Principal (or its designated Affiliate(s)) shall assign, transfer, convey and deliver to the Corporation its
Repurchased Equity Interests by [provide any specific instructions]; and
|
b.
|
the Corporation shall deliver to each MSP Principal (or its designated Affiliate(s)) its share of the Aggregate Exercise Price
by wire transfer of immediately available funds, to such account designated by the MSP Principal in writing not less than two (2) Business Days prior to such Repurchase Closing Date.
|
MSP RECOVERY INC.
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
By:
|
| |
[Name]
|
| |
|
|
| |
[Title]
|
| |
|
|
| |
COMPANY:
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY, Inc., a
Delaware corporation
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
|
| |
ORIGINAL HOLDERS:
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
LIONHEART EQUITIES, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Ophir Sternberg
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
Name: Ophir Sternberg
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
Name: Paul Rapisarda
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
Name: Faquiry Diaz Cala
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
Name: Thomas Byrne
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
Name: James Anderson
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
Name: Roger Meltzer
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
Name: Thomas W. Hawkins
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
NOMURA SECURITIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Bryan Finkel
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Managing Director
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
ADDITIONAL HOLDERS:
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
JOHN RUIZ
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: John Ruiz
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
|
| |
JOCRAL HOLDINGS, LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
|
| |
FRANK QUESADA
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Frank Quesada
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
|
| |
QUESADA GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
|
| |
RUIZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
|
| |
JOHN H. RUIZ, II
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: John H. Ruiz, II
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
*
|
for the avoidance of doubt, such Additional Holders are included as “Holders” as used herein unless otherwise explicitly excluded.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Page
|
| | | | ||||||
|
| | | | | | |||
| | | | ||||||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
| | | | ||||||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
| | | | ||||||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
| | | | ||||||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
| | | | ||||||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
| | | | ||||||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | | |||
|
| | | | | |
|
| |
If to the Corporate Taxpayer, to:
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
4218 NE 2nd Avenue
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
2nd Floor
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Miami, Florida 33137
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Attention:
|
| |
Ophir Sternberg
|
|
| |
|
| |
Email:
|
| |
o@lheartcapital.com
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Gutiérrez Bergman Boulris, PLLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
901 Ponce De Leon Blvd, Suite 303
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Coral Gables, Florida 331134
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Attention:
|
| |
Dale S. Bergman, Esq.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Email:
|
| |
dale.bergman@gbbpl.com
|
|
| |
If to the TRA Parties, to:
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
if to the Members’ Representative:
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
2701 Le Jeune Road, Floor 10
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Coral Gables, Florida 33134
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Attn:
|
| |
General Counsel
|
|
| |
|
| |
Email:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
767 Fifth Avenue
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
New York, NY 10153
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Attn:
|
| |
Michael J. Aiello
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Amanda Fenster
|
|
| |
|
| |
Email:
|
| |
michael.aiello@weil.com
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Amanda.Fenster@weil.com
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY, INC.
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MASTER MSP, LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
TRA PARTY REPRESENTATIVE
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
TRA PARTIES:
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
[ ]
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
|
| |
Sincerely,
|
| |||||
|
| |
|
| |||||
|
| |
SPONSOR:
|
| |||||
|
| |
|
| |||||
|
| |
LIONHEART EQUITIES, LLC
|
| |||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
By:
|
| |
/s/ Ophir Sternberg
|
| ||
|
| |
Name: Ophir Sternberg
|
| |||||
|
| |
Title: Chairman and CEO
|
|
|
| |
INSIDERS:
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
/s/ Ophir Sternberg
|
|||
|
| |
Ophir Sternberg
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
/s/ Paul Rapisarda
|
|||
|
| |
Paul Rapisarda
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
/s/ Faquiry Diaz Cala
|
|||
|
| |
Faquiry Diaz Cala
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
/s/ James Anderson
|
|||
|
| |
James Anderson
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
/s/ Thomas Byrne
|
|||
|
| |
Thomas Byrne
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
/s/ Roger Meltzer
|
|||
|
| |
Roger Meltzer
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
/s/ Thomas W. Hawkins
|
|||
|
| |
Thomas W. Hawkins
|
By:
|
| |
/s/ Ophir Sternberg
|
| |
|
|
| |
Name: Ophir Sternberg
|
| |
|
|
| |
Title: Chairman and CEO
|
| |
|
1
|
Note to draft: Only applicable for the CEO’s
employment agreement.
|
|
| |
If to the Company:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Lionheart II Holdings, LLC
|
| |
|
|
| |
2701 Le Jeune Road, Floor 10
|
| |
|
|
| |
Coral Gables, Florida 33134
|
| |
|
|
| |
Attn: General Counsel
|
| |
|
|
| |
Email: [•]
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
With a copy to which shall not constitute notice to:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
|
| |
|
|
| |
767 Fifth Avenue
|
| |
|
|
| |
New York, New York 10153
|
| |
|
|
| |
Attn: Michael J. Aiello
|
| ||
|
| |
Matthew Gilroy
|
| |
|
|
| |
Email: michael.aiello@weil.com
|
| |
|
|
| |
matthew.gilroy@weil.com
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
If to Executive:
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
At Executive’s home address as then shown in the Company’s personnel records,
|
|
| |
LIONHEART II HOLDINGS, LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
By:
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
EXECUTIVE
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Name:
|
|
| |
If to the Escrow Agent:
|
|||||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
Continental Stock Transfer and Trust Company
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
One State Street — 30th Floor
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
New York, New York 10004
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
Facsimile No: (212) 616-7615
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
Attention:
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Email:
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
if to Parent or Purchaser, to:
|
|||||||||
|
| |
|
| |
4218 NE 2nd Avenue
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
2nd Floor
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
Miami, Florida 33137
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
Attention:
|
| |
Ophir Sternberg
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Email:
|
| |
o@lheartcapital.com
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):
|
|||||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
DLA Piper LLP (US)
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
2525 East Camelback Road
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
Esplanade II Suite 1000
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
Phoenix, AZ 85016-4232
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
Attention:
|
| |
Steven D. Pidgeon
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Email:
|
| |
steven.pidgeon@us.dlapiper.com
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
if to the MSP Companies:
|
|||||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2701 Le Jeune Road, Floor 10
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
Coral Gables, Florida 33134
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
Attn: General Counsel
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
Email:
|
| |
[•]
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |||||
|
| |
with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):
|
|||||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
767 Fifth Avenue
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
New York, NY 10153
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
Attention:
|
| |
Michael J. Aiello
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Matthew Gilroy
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Email:
|
| |
michael.aiello@weil.com
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
matthew.gilroy@weil.com
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |||||
|
| |
if to the Members’ Representative:
|
|||||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2701 Le Jeune Road, Floor 10
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
Coral Gables, Florida 33134
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
Attn:
|
| |
General Counsel
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Email:
|
| |
[•]
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):
|
|||||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
767 Fifth Avenue
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
New York, NY 10153
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
Attention:
|
| |
Michael J. Aiello
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Matthew Gilroy
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Email:
|
| |
michael.aiello@weil.com
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
matthew.gilroy@weil.com
|
| |
|
|
| |
ESCROW AGENT:
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
|
|
| |
PARENT:
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Lionheart Acquisition Corporation II
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
|
|
| |
PURCHASER:
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Lionheart II Holdings, LLC
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
|
|
| |
MEMBERS’ REPRESENTATIVE (SOLELY IN HIS CAPACITY AS SUCH):
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
Party
|
| |
Representative
|
| |
Telephone No.
|
| |
Signature
|
Purchaser
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Members’ Representative
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
PURCHASER:
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
LIONHEART II HOLDINGS, LLC
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |||||
By:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Name:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Title:
|
| |
|
| |
|
MEMBERS’ REPRESENTATIVE (SOLELY IN HIS CAPACITY AS SUCH):
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
JOHN H. RUIZ
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
By:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Name:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Title:
|
| |
|
| |
|
PARENT:
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
LIONHEART ACQUISITION CORPORATION II
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
By:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Name:
|
| |
|
| |
|
Title:
|
| |
|
| |
|
1.
|
attached is a Release Order pursuant to which the Escrow Agent is authorized to promptly release [•] Up-C Units from the Escrow
Fund to [name of applicable recipient] to [insert wire instructions/security remittance instructions] and the Escrow Agent is instructed to comply with such
Release Order [and to instruct [•], Purchaser’s transfer agent, to transfer and deliver such Up-C Units on its books];
|
2.
|
the Release Order is final and from a court of competent jurisdiction;
|
3.
|
the Escrow Agent shall be entitled to conclusively rely on the attached Release Order without further investigation; and
|
4.
|
[Purchaser]/[Members’ Representative] [are/is] delivering a copy of this Certificate of Release Order simultaneously to
[Purchaser]/[Members’ Representative].
|
PURCHASER:
|
| |
MEMBERS’ REPRESENTATIVE:
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |||||
[•]
|
| |
|
| |
[•]
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |||||
By:
|
| |
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |||||
Name:
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |||||
Title:
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
|
|
| |
(a)
|
| |
If to LCAP prior to the Closing, to:
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
4218 NE 2nd Avenue
|
|
| |
|
| |
2nd Floor
|
|
| |
|
| |
Miami, Florida 33137
|
|
| |
|
| |
Attention: Ophir Sternberg
|
|
| |
|
| |
Email: o@lheartcapital.com
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
DLA Piper LLP (US)
|
|
| |
|
| |
2525 East Camelback Road
|
|
| |
|
| |
Esplanade II Suite 1000
|
|
| |
|
| |
Phoenix, AZ 85016-4232
|
|
| |
|
| |
Attention: Steven D. Pidgeon
|
|
| |
|
| |
Email: steven.pidgeon@us.dlapiper.com
|
|
| |
(b)
|
| |
If to LCAP following the Closing, to:
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2701 Le Jeune Road, Floor 10
|
|
| |
|
| |
Coral Gables, Florida 33134
|
|
| |
|
| |
Attn: General Counsel
|
|
| |
|
| |
Email: [•]
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
|
|
| |
|
| |
767 Fifth Avenue
|
|
| |
|
| |
New York, NY 10153
|
|
| |
|
| |
Attention: Michael Aiello; Matthew Gilroy
|
|
| |
|
| |
Email: michael.aiello@weil.com; matthew.gilroy@weil.com
|
|
| |
Lionheart Acquisition Corporation II
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name: Ophir Sternberg
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title: Chairman
|
|
| |
HOLDER
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
[•]
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Address:
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
[•]
|
| |
|
LIONHEART II HOLDINGS, LLC
|
| |
La Ley con John H. Ruiz P.A., d/b/a
MSP Recovery Law Firm
|
|
| |
|
By:
|
| |
By:
|
Name:
|
| |
Name: John H. Ruiz
|
Title: Manager
|
| |
Title: President
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP Law Firm PLLC
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
|
| |
Name: John H. Ruiz
|
|
| |
Title: Manager
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY, INC.
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
|
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, as Warrant Agent
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
|
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP RECOVERY, INC.
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
|
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, as Warrant Agent
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
|
|
| |
Title
|
| |
|
Date: , 20
|
| |
|
|
| |
(Signature)
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
(Address)
|
|
| |
(Tax Identification Number)
|
|
| |
|
Signature Guaranteed:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Re:
|
Side Letter Agreement
|
a.
|
Parent’s annual meeting of stockholders in 2022, in respect of the independent director referred to in Section 1 who is
appointed to serve as a Class I director,
|
b.
|
Parent’s annual meeting of stockholders in 2023, in respect of the independent director referred to in Section 1 who is
appointed to serve as a Class II director, and
|
c.
|
Parent’s annual meeting of stockholders in 2024, in respect of Ophir Sternberg,
|
|
| |
Sincerely,
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
JOHN H. RUIZ
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
LIONHEART ACQUISITION CORPORATION II
|
| |||||
|
| |
|
| ||
By:
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Name: Ophir Sternberg
|
| |
|
|
| |
Title: President and CEO
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| ||
LIONHEART II HOLDINGS, LLC
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
|
| ||
By:
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Name: Ophir Sternberg
|
| |
|
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
|
|
| |
Sincerely,
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
JOHN H. RUIZ
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
FRANK C. QUESADA
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
LIONHEART ACQUISITION CORPORATION II
|
|||||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
By:
|
| |
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Ophir Sternberg
|
| |
|
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Chairman and CEO
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
LIONHEART II HOLDINGS, LLC
|
|||||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
By:
|
| |
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Ophir Sternberg
|
| |
|
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
|
| |
|
1.
|
Guaranteed Obligation. In accordance with Section 5 of the Transaction Agreement, the Guarantors hereby unconditionally
but severally guarantee the timely payment of the VRM Full Return to VRM on or prior to the first anniversary of the MTA Effective Time (the “Shortfall”) by: (a) payment of
Recovery Proceeds to VRM, (b) sale of the Reserved SPAC Units (as defined in the Transaction Agreement) and delivery of the resulting net cash proceeds thereof to VRM, (c) sale of additional shares of Parent Class A Common Stock and
delivery of the net cash proceeds thereof to VRM, or (d) any combination of the foregoing ((a) – (d), the “Payment Methods”); provided that in no event shall a Guarantor’s
aggregate liability for its portion of the Guaranteed Obligation exceed the value of the Shortfall (calculated as of the day of such payment) attributed to such Guarantor on Schedule A (the “Cap”), and this Guaranty may not be enforced against a Guarantor without giving effect to the Cap. If, on the one year anniversary of the MTA Effective Time (the “Outside Date”), VRM has not received the VRM Full Return, each Guarantor will cause VRM to be paid, within (5) business days of the Outside Date and by any of the Payment Methods, the Shortfall calculated as of the date of
such payment necessary to result in the VRM Full Return being paid to VRM, without deduction, setoff or counterclaim, up to its Cap (the “Guaranteed Obligation”). For purpose of
this Guaranty, “Recovery Proceeds” will mean all Distributable Amounts of Primary Proceeds (including New Claims Proceeds) and Collateral Proceeds (as defined in the LLCA). VRM
hereby agrees that in no event shall the Guarantors be required to pay any amount to VRM under, in respect of, or in connection with this Guaranty other than by any of the Payment Methods and as expressly set forth herein. This Guaranty
may only be enforced by, and any claim or other demand in respect of this Guaranty may only be brought against the Guarantors by VRM in accordance with the terms hereof. This Guaranty may be enforced for the payment of money only. All
payments hereunder shall be made in lawful money of the United States, in immediately available funds.
|
2.
|
Guaranty Unconditional. This Guaranty is, and is intended to be, an absolute, unconditional, irrevocable, and continuing
guaranty of payment (and not merely of collection) which is independent of and in addition
|
3.
|
Enforcement of Guaranty. VRM may make demands upon any Guarantor for the payment or performance of its several portion
of the Guaranteed Obligation, by any of the Payment Methods and up to its Cap, without being required to first proceed or exhaust its remedies against the JV Entity or any other Guarantor or any other person.
|
4.
|
Waivers. Subject to any limitations prescribed by applicable law, each Guarantor hereby waives diligence, presentment,
demand of payment, filing of claims with a court in the event of insolvency or bankruptcy of the JV Entity, any right to require a proceeding first against the JV Entity, and protest or notice (other than any notices required to be
delivered under the LLCA or the Transaction Agreement), or the amounts payable by the JV Entity, and all demands whatsoever.
|
5.
|
Bankruptcy. This Guaranty will continue to be effective or be reinstated, as the case may be, if at any time all or part
of any payment (or interest thereon) of the Recovery Proceeds by the JV Entity under the LLCA or by any Guarantor under this Guaranty, in either case for the Guaranteed Obligation, is avoided or must otherwise be restored by VRM upon the
bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization of the JV Entity or any Guarantor or otherwise, but only to the extent of such payment.
|
6.
|
Subordination and Subrogation. During any period following the Outside Date during which the VRM Full Return has not
been paid in full, until the Guaranteed Obligation which is then due and owing (subject to each Guarantor’s Cap) to VRM plus all out-of-pocket costs of enforcement and collection actually incurred by VRM in pursuing the Guarantors in
respect of the Guaranteed Obligation (collectively, “Collection Costs”), if any, are paid or satisfied in full, each Guarantor subordinates any and all rights such Guarantor has
to be repaid or reimbursed by the JV Entity for amounts paid by such Guarantor on the JV Entity’s behalf to the rights of VRM. Further, regardless of whether or not the Guaranteed Obligation has been satisfied in full, no Guarantor will
have any right of subrogation against VRM by reason of any payments by such Guarantor in favor of any other person on behalf of the JV Entity or any of its affiliates covering essentially the same payment and performance obligations.
|
7.
|
Suretyship Waivers. Each Guarantor hereby waives any and all suretyship defenses such Guarantor would otherwise have
under the laws of Texas, Delaware, New York, Florida and any other jurisdiction that may apply to this Guaranty or such Guarantor’s obligations or liabilities hereunder.
|
8.
|
Representations and Warranties.
|
a.
|
To induce VRM to accept this Guaranty, the Guarantors (severally and not jointly) each represent and warrant to VRM as follows:
|
i.
|
Benefit. Such Guarantor has received, or will receive, direct or indirect benefit from the making of this Guaranty.
|
ii.
|
Familiarity. Each Guarantor is familiar with, and has independently reviewed books and records regarding, the financial
condition of the JV Entity; however, no Guarantor is relying on such financial condition as an inducement to enter into this Guaranty.
|
iii.
|
No Representation by VRM. Neither VRM nor its affiliates, nor any other party, has made any representation, warranty, or
statement to any Guarantor in order to induce such Guarantor to execute this Guaranty.
|
iv.
|
Guarantors’ Solvency. Following the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Agreement, and
assuming that the Up-C Units issued to the Guarantors have a value of $10 per Up-C Unit, after giving effect to this Guaranty and the contingent obligation evidenced hereby, each Guarantor will be solvent, and will have property and
assets sufficient to satisfy and repay its obligations and liabilities pursuant to this Guaranty.
|
v.
|
Legality. The execution, delivery and performance by such Guarantor of this Guaranty and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereunder do not, and will not, contravene or conflict with any law, statute or regulation whatsoever to which such Guarantor is subject or constitute a default (or an event which with notice or lapse of time or
both would constitute a default) under, or result in the breach of, any indenture, mortgage, deed of trust, charge, lien, or any contract, agreement or other instrument to which such Guarantor is a party or which may be applicable to such
Guarantor. This Guaranty is a legal and binding obligation of such Guarantor and is enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as limited by bankruptcy, insolvency or other laws of general application relating to the enforcement of
creditors’ rights. There is no action, proceeding, or investigation pending or, to such Guarantor’s knowledge, threatened (nor any basis therefor) which questions, directly or indirectly, the validity or enforceability of this Guaranty as
to such Guarantor or which would materially and adversely affect the assets of such Guarantor.
|
vi.
|
OFAC. Neither such Guarantor nor any person that directly or indirectly controls it is prohibited from transacting
business of the type contemplated by this Guaranty under regulations of the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) of the U.S. Department of the Treasury (including, but not
limited to, those named on OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons list) or under any statute that prohibits persons transacting business in the United States from entering into transactions with other persons by reason
of violation of money laundering, terrorist financing or official international sanctions against other countries or nations of other countries, or executive order, including, but not limited to, Executive Order Number 13224 dated
September 24, 2001, entitled Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions With Persons Who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism.
|
vii.
|
Execution. Such Guarantor has the full power, authority, capacity and legal right to execute and deliver this Guaranty.
|
b.
|
By accepting and agreeing to this Guaranty, VRM represents and warrants to the Guarantors as follows:
|
i.
|
No Representation by the Guarantors. None of the Guarantors nor any of their respective affiliates, nor any other party,
has made any representation, warranty, or statement to VRM in order to induce VRM to accept this Guaranty.
|
ii.
|
Legality. The execution, delivery and performance by VRM of this Guaranty and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereunder do not, and will not, contravene or conflict with any law, statute or regulation whatsoever to which VRM is subject or constitute a default (or an event which with notice or lapse of time or both would constitute a
default) under, or result in the breach of, any indenture, mortgage, deed of trust, charge, lien, or any contract, agreement or other instrument to which VRM is a party or which may be applicable to VRM. This Guaranty is a legal and
binding obligation of VRM and is enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as limited by bankruptcy, insolvency or other laws of general application relating to the enforcement of creditors’ rights. There is no action, proceeding,
or investigation pending or, to VRM’s knowledge, threatened (nor any basis therefor) which questions, directly or indirectly, the validity or enforceability of this Guaranty as to VRM or which would materially and adversely affect the
assets of VRM.
|
iii.
|
Execution. VRM has the full power, authority, capacity and legal right to accept and agree to this Guaranty.
|
9.
|
Notices. All notices provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this Guaranty must be in writing and may be
delivered either (a) personally (which includes deliveries by courier), (b) by email (provided that a copy of such notice is contemporaneously sent by one of the delivery methods described in clauses (a) or (c) of this Section 9),
or (c) by nationally recognized express courier for overnight deliver:
|
If to VRM:
|
| |
Virage Recovery Master LP
c/o Virage Capital Management LP 1700 Post Oak Blvd. 2 BLVD Place Suite 300 Houston, TX 77056 Emails: eondarza@viragecm.com
bmcdavid@viragecm.com |
|
| |
|
With a copy to:
|
| |
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1800
Dallas, Texas 75201
Attention: Adam Hilkemann
Email: ahilkemann@akingump.com
|
|
| |
|
If to a Lionheart Guarantor:
|
| |
c/o Lionheart Acquisition Corporation II
4218 NE 2nd Avenue
Miami, Florida 33137
Attn: Ophir Sternberg
Email: o@lheartcapital.com
|
|
| |
|
With a copy to:
|
| |
DLA Piper LLP (US)
2525 East Camelback Road
Esplanade II Suite 1000
Phoenix, AZ 85016-4232
Attn: Steven D. Pidgeon
Email: steven.pidgeon@us.dlapiper.com
|
|
| |
|
If to an MSP Guarantor:
|
| |
c/o MSP Recovery, LLC
2701 Le Jeune Road, Floor 10
Coral Gables, Florida 33134
Attn: General Counsel
Email: generalcounsel@msprecovery.com
|
|
| |
|
With a copy to:
|
| |
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153 Attn: Michael J. Aiello Amanda Fenster Email: michael.aiello@weil.com
amanda.fenster@weil.com |
10.
|
No Assignment. VRM may not assign this Guaranty or its rights under this Guaranty without the consent of each Guarantor
(which may be given or withheld in its sole and absolute discretion). No Guarantor may assign its obligations under this Guaranty without the consent of VRM (which may be given or withheld in VRM’s sole and absolute discretion).
|
11.
|
Successors. Without limiting Section 10 above, this Guaranty is binding upon and inures to the benefit of the
parties and their respective permitted successors and assigns.
|
12.
|
Governing Law/Jurisdiction. This Guaranty is to be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of
the State of Delaware, without regard to its conflicts of laws principles.
|
13.
|
Disputes. Each Guarantor agrees that any past, present, or future dispute, controversy, or claim arising under or
relating to this Guaranty must be submitted for resolution to binding arbitration in accordance with the provisions of Section 14.12 of the LLCA, as if such provision was fully set forth in this Guaranty. In the event that any Guarantor
institutes any legal suit, action or proceeding, including arbitration, against another Guarantor or VRM in respect of a matter arising out of or relating to this Guaranty, the prevailing party in the suit, action or proceeding will be
entitled to receive, in addition to all other damages to which it may be entitled, the costs incurred by such party in conducting the suit, action or proceeding, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses and court costs.
|
14.
|
Severability. If any clause or provision of this Guaranty is held to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable under any law
applicable to the terms hereof, then the remainder of this Guaranty will not be affected thereby, and in lieu of each such clause or provision of this Guaranty that is illegal, invalid or unenforceable, such clause or provision will be
judicially construed and interpreted to be as similar in substance and content to such illegal, invalid or unenforceable clause or provision, as the context thereof would reasonably suggest, so as to thereafter be legal, valid and
enforceable.
|
15.
|
Entire Agreement; Amendments. This Guaranty, together with the Transaction Agreement and the LLCA, contains the entire
agreement between each Guarantor and VRM relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes and replaces any prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, or commitments between any Guarantor and VRM (or any of them), including
the Term Sheet, dated June 28, 2021, by and among VRM, Series MRCS, the JV Entity and the Guarantors. Amendments, variations, modifications or changes to this Guaranty may be made effective and binding upon the parties by, and only by,
the setting forth of same in a document duly executed by each Guarantor and VRM, and any alleged amendment, variation, modification or change herein which is not so documented will not be effective as to any party.
|
16.
|
No Third-Party Beneficiaries. No person will be entitled to any third-party beneficiary rights under this Guaranty and
no creditor of VRM will be entitled to any rights to enforce this Guaranty or the obligations of any Guarantor.
|
17.
|
Limitation of Liability; Termination.
|
a.
|
Despite anything in this Guaranty to the contrary, recourse against any Guarantor for the satisfaction of the Guaranteed
Obligation will be limited solely to the assets of such Guarantor and none of (i) any person owning, directly or indirectly, any legal or beneficial interest in such Guarantor, (ii) any partner (general or limited, or a subpartner at any
level), principal, officer, controlling person, beneficiary, trustee, real estate investment advisor or other similar fiduciary, shareholder, employee, agent, affiliate or director of such Guarantor or any person described in clause
(i) above, or (iii) any of such persons’ respective successors and assigns, will be personally liable for the performance of the obligations described in this Guaranty or the satisfaction of any judgment and all such liability will be
deemed to be waived by VRM.
|
b.
|
This Guaranty will terminate and be of no further force and effect upon the earliest to occur of (i) the payment in full of the
VRM Full Return to VRM or (ii) the valid termination of the Transaction Agreement in accordance with its terms. Upon the request of any Guarantor following such time, VRM will execute and deliver to each Guarantor a written release of
this Guaranty with respect to claims arising thereafter.
|
|
| |
LIONHEART GUARANTORS:
|
||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Lionheart Acquisition Corporation II
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Lionheart II Holdings, LLC
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
|
|
| |
MSP GUARANTORS:
|
| ||||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
MSP Recovery, LLC
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |||||
|
| |
|
| |
John H. Ruiz
|
| |||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |||||
|
| |
|
| |
Frank C. Quesada
|
|
Virage Recovery Master LP
|
| |
|
||||||
By:
|
| |
Virage Recovery LLC
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Edward Ondarza
|
| |
|
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Manager
|
| |
|
Guarantor
|
| |
Cap (as % of Shortfall)
|
Lionheart Acquisition Corporation II and Lionheart II Holdings, LLC
|
| |
100%
|
John H. Ruiz
|
| |
70%
|
Frank C. Quesada
|
| |
30%
|
Exhibit
|
| |
Description
|
| |
Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (included as Annex A-1 to this proxy
statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Amendment No. 1 to Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (included as Annex
A-2 to this proxy statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Amendment No. 2 to Membership Interest Purchase Agreement. (included as Annex
A-3 to this proxy statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Amendment No. 3 to Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (included as Annex
A-4 to this proxy statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 19, 2020)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 19, 2020)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Form of the Post-Combination Company’s Charter (included as Annex B to this
proxy statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Form of the Post-Combination Company’s Bylaws (included as Annex C to this
proxy statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Specimen Unit Certificate of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-240130) filed with the SEC on August 6, 2020)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Specimen Class A Common Stock Certificate of the Registrant (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-240130) filed with the SEC on August 6, 2020)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Specimen Warrant Certificate of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-240130) filed with the SEC on August 6, 2020)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Warrant Agreement, dated August 13, 2020, by and between the Registrant and
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 19, 2020)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Form of New Warrant Agreement (included as Annex M to this proxy
statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Form of New Warrant Certificate (included in Annex M to this proxy
statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Form of Opinion of DLA Piper LLP (US) as to the validity of securities being
registered
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Opinion of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP regarding certain U.S. tax matters.
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Letter Agreement, dated August 13, 2020, by and among the Registrant and its
officers, directors, Nomura and the Sponsor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 19, 2020)
|
|
|
| |
|
Exhibit
|
| |
Description
|
| |
Investment Management Trust Agreement, dated August 13, 2020, by and between the
Registrant and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 19, 2020)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 13, 2020, by and among the Registrant
and certain security holders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 19, 2020)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated July 27, 2020, by and between the Sponsor
and Nomura (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 19, 2020)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Private Placement Unit Subscription Agreement, dated August 13, 2020, by and
between the Registrant and the Sponsor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 19, 2020)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Private Placement Unit Subscription Agreement, dated August 13, 2020, by and
between the Registrant and Nomura (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 19, 2020)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Indemnity Agreements, each dated as of August 13, 2020, by and between the
Registrant and each of the officers and directors of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 19, 2020)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Administrative Support Agreement, dated August 13, 2020, by and between the
Registrant and the Sponsor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 19, 2020)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Forward Purchase Agreement, dated August 13, 2020, by and between the Company and
Nomura (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 19, 2020)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Form of Limited Liability Agreement of Opco (included as Annex D to this proxy
statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Form of Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement (included as Annex E
to this proxy statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Form of Tax Receivable Agreement (included as Annex F to this proxy
statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Sponsor Agreement (included as Annex G to this proxy statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Form of Employment Agreement (included as Annex H to this proxy
statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Form of Escrow Agreement (included as Annex I to this proxy statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Form of 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan (included as Annex J to this proxy
statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Form of Lock-Up Agreement (included as Annex K to this proxy
statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Form of Legal Services Agreement (included as Annex L to this proxy
statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Side Letter Agreement (included as Annex N to this proxy statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Virage Side Letter Agreement (included as Annex O to this proxy
statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
Exhibit
|
| |
Description
|
| |
Form of VRM Full Return Guaranty Agreement (included as Annex P to this proxy
statement/prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Form of Asset and Interest Transfer Agreement in relation to the Series MRCS
Asset Acquisition
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Form of Transfer Agreement in relation to the VRM MSP Asset Acquisition
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Form of Master Transaction Agreement in relation to the VRM MSP Asset
Acquisition
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Consent of Marcum LLP
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Consent of DLA Piper LLP (US) (included in Exhibit 5.1 hereto)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Power of Attorney (included on signature page to this registration statement)
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Consent of John H. Ruiz to be named as a director of the Post-Combination
Company
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Consent of Frank C. Quesada to be named as a director of the Post-Combination
Company
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Consent of Ophir Sternberg to be named as a director of the Post-Combination
Company
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Consent of Roger Melzer to be named as a director of the Post-Combination
Company
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Consent of Thomas Hawkins to be named as a director of the Post-Combination
Company
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Consent of Michael Arrigo to be named as a director of the Post-Combination
Company
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Consent of Beatriz Assapimonwait to be named as a director of the
Post-Combination Company
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Form of Proxy Card
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Brattle Presentation (included as Annex Q to this proxy/statement prospectus)
|
|
|
| |
|
101.INS
|
| |
Inline XBRL Instance Document (the instance document does not appear in the
Interactive Data File because iXBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document)
|
|
| |
|
101.SCH
|
| |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
| |
|
101.CAL
|
| |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
| |
|
101.DEF
|
| |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
| |
|
101.LAB
|
| |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
| |
|
101.PRE
|
| |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
| |
|
| |
Calculation of Filing Fee Tables
|
**
|
To be filed by amendment subsequently.
|
+
|
Previously filed.
|
†
|
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act
because the information is not material and would be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed.
|
A.
|
To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:
|
(i)
|
To include any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act;
|
(ii)
|
To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most
recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume
of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of
prospectus filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table
in the effective registration statement.
|
(iii)
|
To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration
statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement;
|
B.
|
That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed
to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
|
C.
|
To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold
at the termination of the offering.
|
D.
|
That, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act to any purchaser, each prospectus filed pursuant to
Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the
registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated
or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any
statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.
|
E.
|
That, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act to any purchaser in the initial
distribution of the securities, that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the
securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:
|
(i)
|
Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant
to Rule 424;
|
(ii)
|
Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred
to by the undersigned registrant;
|
(iii)
|
The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned
registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
|
(iv)
|
Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.
|
F.
|
That prior to any public reoffering of the securities registered hereunder through use of a prospectus which is a part of this
registration statement, by any person or party who is deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of Rule 145(c), the issuer undertakes that such reoffering prospectus will contain the
|
G.
|
That every prospectus (i) that is filed pursuant to paragraph (F) immediately preceding, or (ii) that purports to meet the
requirements of section 10 (a)(3) of the Securities Act and is used in connection with an offering of securities subject to Rule 415, will be filed as a part of an amendment to the registration statement and will not be used until such
amendment is effective, and that, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and
the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
|
H.
|
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in
the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
|
I.
|
To supply by means of a post-effective amendment all information concerning a transaction, and the company being acquired
involved therein, that was not the subject of and included in the registration statement when it became effective.
|
|
| |
|
| |
LIONHEART ACQUISITION CORPORATION II
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
By:
|
| |
*
|
|||
|
| |
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Ophir Sternberg
|
|
| |
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Signature
|
| |
Title
|
| |
Date
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
*
|
| |
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
| |
April 7, 2022
|
Ophir Sternberg
|
| |||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
*
|
| |
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)
|
| |
April 7, 2022
|
Paul Rapisarda
|
| |||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
*
|
| |
Director
|
| |
April 7, 2022
|
Roger Meltzer
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| |
|
| |
|
*
|
| |
Director
|
| |
April 7, 2022
|
James Anderson
|
| |||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
*
|
| |
Director
|
| |
April 7, 2022
|
Thomas Byrne
|
| |||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
*
|
| |
Director
|
| |
April 7, 2022
|
Thomas Hawkins
|
|
*By:
|
| |
/s/ Ophir Sternberg
|
| |
|
|||
|
| |
Name:
|
| |
Ophir Sternberg
|
| |
|
|
| |
Title:
|
| |
Attorney-in-Fact
|
| |
|